Head to head · Robot pool cleaners
MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
MOVA Diver A10 or Beatbot Sora 70? Verdict Scores 81 and 72. The Diver A10: filter fineness 3 vs 150 µm; the Sora 70: debris basket 6 vs 3.5 l.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

MOVA press image

Beatbot press image
Verdict
The MOVA Diver A10 has the higher Verdict Score, 81 to 72.
The MOVA Diver A10 has the edge in navigation, filtration, automation and value. The Beatbot Sora 70 has the edge in coverage, power, ease of use and reliability.
In the manufacturers' published figures the MOVA Diver A10 is ahead on one row: filter fineness (3 µm against 150 µm). In turn, the Beatbot Sora 70 is ahead on 4 rows, among them debris basket (6 l against 3.5 l), rated pool size (300 m² against 180 m²) and runtime (5 h against 4 h).
At $699 against $1,099, the MOVA Diver A10 is the cheaper of the two. The MOVA Diver A10 suits pools with fine sand, silt or pollen. The Beatbot Sora 70 suits tree-lined pools where leaves land daily.
Where the MOVA Diver A10 is ahead
- Filtration81 · 42
- Navigation86 · 73
- Automation66 · 52
- Value100 · 44
- Filter fineness3 µm · 150 µm
Where the Beatbot Sora 70 is ahead
- Coverage100 · 80
- Power91 · 83
- Ease of Use84 · 73
- Reliability72 · 60
- Debris basket6 l · 3.5 l
- Rated pool size300 m² · 180 m²
- Runtime5 h · 4 h
- Pump flow25,740 l/h · 22,700 l/h
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | MOVA MOVA Diver A10 | Beatbot Beatbot Sora 70 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
81/100 $699Price in the manufacturer's shop | 72/100 $1,099Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 81/100 | 72/100 |
| Coverage | 80 | 100 |
| Filtration | 81 | 42 |
| Navigation | 86 | 73 |
| Power | 83 | 91 |
| Automation | 66 | 52 |
| Ease of Use | 73 | 84 |
| Reliability | 60 | 72 |
| Value | 100 | 44 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| What it cleans | ||
| Floor | Yes | Yes |
| Walls | Yes | Yes |
| Waterline | Yes | Yes |
| Surface | No | Yes |
| Filtration | ||
| Filter fineness | 3 µm | 150 µm |
| Debris basket | 3.5 l | 6 l |
| Filter | 3 µm replaceable ultra-fine mesh | Not published |
| Optional filter | Not published | 3 μm basket sold separately |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | AI vision | Ultrasonic |
| Rated pool size | 180 m² | 300 m² |
| Floor gradient | Not published | Not published |
| Sensors | 6, optical, with AI object recognition | 18, including two ultrasonic sensors |
| Automation | ||
| Lifts itself out | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to the edge | Yes | Yes |
| Dock | No | No |
| Scheduling | Yes | No |
| Water quality sensing | No | No |
| Remote control | No | Yes |
| Power | ||
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | 169 Wh | 10,000 mAh |
| Runtime | 4 h | 5 h |
| Charging time | Not published | 4 h 30 min |
| Pump flow | 22,700 l/h | 25,740 l/h |
| Suction, as published | Not published | 6,800 GPH |
| Motors | Not published | 8 |
| Charging | Not published | 65 W through a titanium plug |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 9 kg | 10.4 kg |
| L × W × H | 425 × 386 × 234 mm | 434 × 429 × 284 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | Not published | 36 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Coverage | ||
| Reach above waterline | 2 in | Not published |
| Shallow water | Not published | From 20 cm; platforms of at least 1 × 1 m |
| Cleaning | ||
| Surface runtime | Not published | 7 h |
| Surface cleaning | Not published | JetPulse twin jets pull floating debris inward |
| Brushes | Not published | Four bottom roller brushes in two groups; 17 cm suction inlet |
| Modes | Not published | Surface, floor, wall, pro, standard, eco |
Also worth a look
- MOVA85
MOVA Rover X10
MOVA's flagship pool robot: skims the surface, cleans floor, walls, waterline, corners, steps and shallows with a 38,000 l/h pump, maps with an underwater laser, runs six hours a charge and parks at the surface.
- Beatbot65
Beatbot Sora 30
The sensible Beatbot: floor, walls, waterline and shallow platforms from 20 cm of water on a 6,800 GPH pump with a 5 l basket, S-shaped paths, and it floats to the surface when done.
- Beatbot62
Beatbot AquaSense 2
Cordless floor, wall and waterline cleaner on a 5,500 GPH pump with a 2 l basket and 16 sensors, rated for 300 m², that surfaces and parks at the edge when it is done or the battery runs low.
Other comparisons
- MOVA Rover X10 vs MOVA Diver A10
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Dreame Z1
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2