Head to head · Robot pool cleaners
Beatbot Sora 70 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
Beatbot Sora 70 or AquaSense 2? The Sora 70: debris basket 6 vs 2 l, pump flow 25,740 vs 20,820 l/h. Verdict Scores 72 and 62.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

Beatbot press image

Beatbot press image
Verdict
The Beatbot Sora 70 has the higher Verdict Score, 72 to 62.
The Beatbot Sora 70 has the edge in coverage, filtration, power, ease of use and reliability. The Beatbot AquaSense 2 has the edge in value.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Beatbot Sora 70 is ahead on 2 rows: debris basket (6 l against 2 l) and pump flow (25,740 l/h against 20,820 l/h). No published figure puts the Beatbot AquaSense 2 ahead.
At $1,099 against $799, the Beatbot AquaSense 2 is the cheaper of the two. The Beatbot Sora 70 suits tree-lined pools where leaves land daily. The Beatbot AquaSense 2 suits owners tired of retrieving a robot from the deep end.
Where the Beatbot Sora 70 is ahead
- Coverage100 · 80
- Filtration42 · 20
- Power91 · 76
- Ease of Use84 · 64
- Reliability72 · 59
- Debris basket6 l · 2 l
- Pump flow25,740 l/h · 20,820 l/h
Where the Beatbot AquaSense 2 is ahead
- Value51 · 44
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Beatbot Beatbot Sora 70 | Beatbot Beatbot AquaSense 2 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
72/100 $1,099Price in the manufacturer's shop | 62/100 $799Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 72/100 | 62/100 |
| Coverage | 100 | 80 |
| Filtration | 42 | 20 |
| Navigation | 73 | 73 |
| Power | 91 | 76 |
| Automation | 52 | 52 |
| Ease of Use | 84 | 64 |
| Reliability | 72 | 59 |
| Value | 44 | 51 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| What it cleans | ||
| Floor | Yes | Yes |
| Walls | Yes | Yes |
| Waterline | Yes | Yes |
| Surface | Yes | No |
| Filtration | ||
| Filter fineness | 150 µm | Not published |
| Debris basket | 6 l | 2 l |
| Optional filter | 3 μm basket sold separately | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Ultrasonic | Ultrasonic |
| Rated pool size | 300 m² | 300 m² |
| Floor gradient | Not published | Not published |
| Sensors | 18, including two ultrasonic sensors | 16, including 2 ultrasonic |
| Automation | ||
| Lifts itself out | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to the edge | Yes | Yes |
| Dock | No | No |
| Scheduling | No | No |
| Water quality sensing | No | No |
| Remote control | Yes | No |
| Power | ||
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | 10,000 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Runtime | 5 h | Not published |
| Charging time | 4 h 30 min | Not published |
| Pump flow | 25,740 l/h | 20,820 l/h |
| Suction, as published | 6,800 GPH | 5,500 GPH |
| Motors | 8 | Not published |
| Charging | 65 W through a titanium plug | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 10.4 kg | 10.47 kg |
| L × W × H | 434 × 429 × 284 mm | Not published |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | Not published |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Cleaning | ||
| Surface runtime | 7 h | Not published |
| Surface cleaning | JetPulse twin jets pull floating debris inward | Not published |
| Brushes | Four bottom roller brushes in two groups; 17 cm suction inlet | Not published |
| Modes | Surface, floor, wall, pro, standard, eco | Not published |
| Coverage | ||
| Shallow water | From 20 cm; platforms of at least 1 × 1 m | Not published |
Also worth a look
- MOVA85
MOVA Rover X10
MOVA's flagship pool robot: skims the surface, cleans floor, walls, waterline, corners, steps and shallows with a 38,000 l/h pump, maps with an underwater laser, runs six hours a charge and parks at the surface.
- Beatbot65
Beatbot Sora 30
The sensible Beatbot: floor, walls, waterline and shallow platforms from 20 cm of water on a 6,800 GPH pump with a 5 l basket, S-shaped paths, and it floats to the surface when done.
- Beatbot54
Beatbot AquaSense
Beatbot's first robot: floor, walls and waterline on a 5,500 GPH pump with ultrasonic mapping, a 2 l basket, a 150 μm filter and a 210 m² rating, but no surface parking.
Other comparisons
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- Dreame Z1 Pro vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- Dreame Z1 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- Beatbot Sora 30 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2