Head to head · Robot pool cleaners
Beatbot Sora 70 vs Beatbot Sora 10
Beatbot Sora 70 or Sora 10? The Sora 70: warranty 36 vs 24 months; the Sora 10: charging time 3 h 30 min vs 4 h 30 min. Verdict Scores 72 and 71.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

Beatbot press image

Beatbot press image
Verdict
The Beatbot Sora 70 has the higher Verdict Score, 72 to 71.
The Beatbot Sora 70 has the edge in coverage, filtration, ease of use and reliability. The Beatbot Sora 10 has the edge in power and value.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Beatbot Sora 70 is ahead on 2 rows: debris basket (6 l against 5 l) and warranty (36 months against 24 months). In turn, the Beatbot Sora 10 is ahead on one row: charging time (3 h 30 min against 4 h 30 min).
At $1,099 against $469, the Beatbot Sora 10 is the cheaper of the two. The Beatbot Sora 70 suits tree-lined pools where leaves land daily. The Beatbot Sora 10 suits pools with tanning ledges and steps on a budget.
Where the Beatbot Sora 70 is ahead
- Coverage100 · 80
- Filtration42 · 35
- Ease of Use84 · 77
- Reliability72 · 60
- Debris basket6 l · 5 l
- Warranty36 months · 24 months
Where the Beatbot Sora 10 is ahead
- Power94 · 91
- Value96 · 44
- Charging time3 h 30 min · 4 h 30 min
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Beatbot Beatbot Sora 70 | Beatbot Beatbot Sora 10 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
72/100 $1,099Price in the manufacturer's shop | 71/100 $469Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 72/100 | 71/100 |
| Coverage | 100 | 80 |
| Filtration | 42 | 35 |
| Navigation | 73 | 73 |
| Power | 91 | 94 |
| Automation | 52 | 52 |
| Ease of Use | 84 | 77 |
| Reliability | 72 | 60 |
| Value | 44 | 96 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| What it cleans | ||
| Floor | Yes | Yes |
| Walls | Yes | Yes |
| Waterline | Yes | Yes |
| Surface | Yes | No |
| Filtration | ||
| Filter fineness | 150 µm | 150 µm |
| Debris basket | 6 l | 5 l |
| Optional filter | 3 μm basket sold separately | 3 μm ultra-fine basket sold separately |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Ultrasonic | Ultrasonic |
| Rated pool size | 300 m² | 300 m² |
| Floor gradient | Not published | Not published |
| Sensors | 18, including two ultrasonic sensors | 11, including one ultrasonic sensor |
| Automation | ||
| Lifts itself out | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to the edge | Yes | Yes |
| Dock | No | No |
| Scheduling | No | No |
| Water quality sensing | No | No |
| Remote control | Yes | No |
| Power | ||
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | 10,000 mAh | 7,800 mAh |
| Runtime | 5 h | 5 h |
| Charging time | 4 h 30 min | 3 h 30 min |
| Pump flow | 25,740 l/h | 25,740 l/h |
| Suction, as published | 6,800 GPH | 6,800 GPH |
| Motors | 8 | 3 |
| Charging | 65 W through a titanium plug | 65 W through a titanium plug |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 10.4 kg | 8.5 kg |
| L × W × H | 434 × 429 × 284 mm | 432 × 386 × 267 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | 24 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Cleaning | ||
| Surface runtime | 7 h | Not published |
| Surface cleaning | JetPulse twin jets pull floating debris inward | Not published |
| Brushes | Four bottom roller brushes in two groups; 17 cm suction inlet | Two front roller brushes with differential speed; 17 cm suction inlet |
| Modes | Surface, floor, wall, pro, standard, eco | Floor, wall, standard, eco |
| Coverage | ||
| Shallow water | From 20 cm; platforms of at least 1 × 1 m | From 35 cm; platforms of at least 1 × 1 m |
Also worth a look
- MOVA85
MOVA Rover X10
MOVA's flagship pool robot: skims the surface, cleans floor, walls, waterline, corners, steps and shallows with a 38,000 l/h pump, maps with an underwater laser, runs six hours a charge and parks at the surface.
- Dreame70
Dreame Z1 Pro
Dreame's better pool robot: floor, walls, waterline and tanning ledges up to 200 m², an 8,000 GPH pump, ultrasound and structured-light sensing and a LiFi remote that works under water.
- Dreame68
Dreame Z1
Dreame's plain Z1: floor, walls and waterline up to 180 m² on an 8,000 GPH pump, ultrasound and structured-light sensing and poolside parking, without the Pro's remote and ledge cleaning.
Other comparisons
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2