Head to head · Robot pool cleaners
Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 10
Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 10: Verdict Scores 72 and 71, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra has the higher Verdict Score, 72 to 71.
The Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra has the edge in coverage, navigation, automation and reliability. The Beatbot Sora 10 has the edge in filtration, power, value and ease of use.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra is ahead on 2 rows: rated pool size (360 m² against 300 m²) and warranty (36 months against 24 months). In turn, the Beatbot Sora 10 is ahead on 2 rows: debris basket (5 l against 4 l) and pump flow (25,740 l/h against 20,820 l/h).
At $2,299 against $449, the Beatbot Sora 10 is the cheaper of the two. The Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra suits large freeform pools with steps and raised platforms. The Beatbot Sora 10 suits pools with tanning ledges and steps on a budget.
Where the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra is ahead
- Coverage100 · 80
- Navigation95 · 73
- Automation72 · 52
- Reliability73 · 61
- Rated pool size360 m² · 300 m²
- Warranty36 months · 24 months
Where the Beatbot Sora 10 is ahead
- Filtration35 · 27
- Power94 · 76
- Ease of Use77 · 65
- Value95 · 25
- Debris basket5 l · 4 l
- Pump flow25,740 l/h · 20,820 l/h
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra | Beatbot Sora 10 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
72/100 $2,299Price in the manufacturer's shop | 71/100 $449Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.de | Check price on Amazon.de | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 72/100 | 71/100 |
| Coverage | 100 | 80 |
| Filtration | 27 | 35 |
| Navigation | 95 | 73 |
| Power | 76 | 94 |
| Automation | 72 | 52 |
| Ease of Use | 65 | 77 |
| Reliability | 73 | 61 |
| Value | 25 | 95 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| What it cleans | ||
| Floor | Yes | Yes |
| Walls | Yes | Yes |
| Waterline | Yes | Yes |
| Surface | Yes | No |
| Filtration | ||
| Filter fineness | 150 µm | 150 µm |
| Debris basket | 4 l | 5 l |
| Baskets | Larger 4.0 l with 150 and 250 μm stages; thinner 3.7 l at 250 μm | Not published |
| Optional filter | Not published | 3 μm ultra-fine basket sold separately |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Camera + sonar | Ultrasonic |
| Rated pool size | 360 m² | 300 m² |
| Floor gradient | Not published | Not published |
| Sensors | 27, including an AI camera with two ToF sensors, two infrared and four ultrasonic sensors | 11, including one ultrasonic sensor |
| Debris detection | AI cruise detection of missed debris; independent cleaning of raised platforms | Not published |
| Power | ||
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Pump flow | 20,820 l/h | 25,740 l/h |
| Suction, as published | 5,500 GPH | 6,800 GPH |
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Motors | 11 | 3 |
| Runtime | Not published | 5 h |
| Charging time | Not published | 3 h 30 min |
| Charging | Not published | 65 W through a titanium plug |
| Automation | ||
| Lifts itself out | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to the edge | Yes | Yes |
| Dock | Yes | No |
| Scheduling | No | No |
| Water quality sensing | No | No |
| Remote control | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 13.2 kg | 8.5 kg |
| L × W × H | 454 × 439 × 277 mm | 432 × 386 × 267 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | 24 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Cleaning | ||
| Brushes | Four extra-large roller brushes and two side brushes | Two front roller brushes with differential speed; 17 cm suction inlet |
| Water clarification | ClearWater natural agent dispensed automatically | Not published |
| Modes | 6 | Floor, wall, standard, eco |
| Chassis | ||
| Wheels | Six guide wheels and two track wheels | Not published |
| Fit | ||
| Pool types | Above-ground and in-ground, all shapes | Not published |
| Coverage | ||
| Shallow water | Not published | From 35 cm; platforms of at least 1 × 1 m |
Also worth a look
- MOVA86
Rover X10
MOVA's flagship pool robot: skims the surface, cleans floor, walls, waterline, corners, steps and shallows with a 38,000 l/h pump, maps with an underwater laser, runs six hours a charge and parks at the surface.
- MOVA81
Diver A10
MOVA's fine-debris pool robot: a 3 µm filter in a 3.5 l basket, camera navigation that recognises drains and steps, four hours a charge, schedules and poolside parking, rated for 180 m².
- Beatbot72
AquaSense X
Beatbot's flagship with a self-cleaning station: AstroRinse rinses the filter and empties a 22 l bin, while the robot skims, cleans floor, walls and waterline and parks at the surface.
Other comparisons
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2

