Head to head · Robot pool cleaners
Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot AquaSense X
Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot AquaSense X: Verdict Scores 72 and 72, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
Both score 72/100. The difference is what each is built for.
The Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra has the edge in navigation and power. The Beatbot AquaSense X has the edge in filtration and ease of use.
No published figure puts the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra ahead. In the manufacturers' published figures the Beatbot AquaSense X is ahead on one row: debris basket (22 l against 4 l).
At $2,299 against $4,250, the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra is the cheaper of the two. The Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra suits large freeform pools with steps and raised platforms. The Beatbot AquaSense X suits owners who never want to empty a basket.
Where the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra is ahead
- Navigation95 · 80
- Power76 · 73
Where the Beatbot AquaSense X is ahead
- Filtration52 · 27
- Ease of Use66 · 65
- Debris basket22 l · 4 l
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra | Beatbot AquaSense X |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
72/100 $2,299Price in the manufacturer's shop | 72/100 $4,250Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Check price on Amazon.de | Check price on Amazon.de | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 72/100 | 72/100 |
| Coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Filtration | 27 | 52 |
| Navigation | 95 | 80 |
| Power | 76 | 73 |
| Automation | 72 | 72 |
| Ease of Use | 65 | 66 |
| Reliability | 73 | 73 |
| Value | 25 | 25 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| What it cleans | ||
| Floor | Yes | Yes |
| Walls | Yes | Yes |
| Waterline | Yes | Yes |
| Surface | Yes | Yes |
| Filtration | ||
| Filter fineness | 150 µm | Not published |
| Debris basket | 4 l | 22 l |
| Baskets | Larger 4.0 l with 150 and 250 μm stages; thinner 3.7 l at 250 μm | Not published |
| Debris capacity | Not published | 22 l, up to two months between emptyings |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Camera + sonar | AI vision |
| Rated pool size | 360 m² | Not published |
| Floor gradient | Not published | Not published |
| Sensors | 27, including an AI camera with two ToF sensors, two infrared and four ultrasonic sensors | Not published |
| Debris detection | AI cruise detection of missed debris; independent cleaning of raised platforms | Not published |
| Power | ||
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Pump flow | 20,820 l/h | Not published |
| Suction, as published | 5,500 GPH | Not published |
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Motors | 11 | Not published |
| Runtime | Not published | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Automation | ||
| Lifts itself out | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to the edge | Yes | Yes |
| Dock | Yes | Yes |
| Scheduling | No | No |
| Water quality sensing | No | No |
| Remote control | Yes | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 13.2 kg | Not published |
| L × W × H | 454 × 439 × 277 mm | Not published |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | 36 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Cleaning | ||
| Brushes | Four extra-large roller brushes and two side brushes | Not published |
| Water clarification | ClearWater natural agent dispensed automatically | ClearWater agent |
| Modes | 6 | Not published |
| Chassis | ||
| Wheels | Six guide wheels and two track wheels | Not published |
| Coating | Not published | Automotive-grade IMR |
| Fit | ||
| Pool types | Above-ground and in-ground, all shapes | Not published |
| Dock | ||
| AstroRinse station | Not published | Cleans the filter and empties the debris in three minutes |
| Coverage | ||
| Shallow platforms | Not published | From 35 cm of water |
| Control | ||
| Voice control | Not published | Yes |
Also worth a look
- MOVA86
Rover X10
MOVA's flagship pool robot: skims the surface, cleans floor, walls, waterline, corners, steps and shallows with a 38,000 l/h pump, maps with an underwater laser, runs six hours a charge and parks at the surface.
- MOVA81
Diver A10
MOVA's fine-debris pool robot: a 3 µm filter in a 3.5 l basket, camera navigation that recognises drains and steps, four hours a charge, schedules and poolside parking, rated for 180 m².
- Beatbot72
Sora 70
The Sora that skims: twin JetPulse jets pull floating debris in for up to seven hours, then it cleans floor, walls and waterline on a 6,800 GPH pump with a 6 l basket and parks at the surface.
Other comparisons
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot AquaSense 2

