Head to head · Robot pool cleaners
Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot AquaSense X
Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra or AquaSense X? The AquaSense X: debris basket 22 vs 4 l. Both score 72 out of 100. The AquaSense 2 Ultra leads on navigation.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

Beatbot press image

Beatbot press image
Verdict
Both score 72/100. The difference is what each is built for.
The Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra has the edge in navigation and power. The Beatbot AquaSense X has the edge in filtration and ease of use.
No published figure puts the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra ahead. In the manufacturers' published figures the Beatbot AquaSense X is ahead on one row: debris basket (22 l against 4 l).
At $2,299 against $3,799, the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra is the cheaper of the two. The Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra suits large freeform pools with steps and raised platforms. The Beatbot AquaSense X suits owners who never want to empty a basket.
Where the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra is ahead
- Navigation95 · 80
- Power76 · 73
Where the Beatbot AquaSense X is ahead
- Filtration50 · 27
- Ease of Use66 · 65
- Debris basket22 l · 4 l
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Beatbot Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra | Beatbot Beatbot AquaSense X |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
72/100 $2,299Price in the manufacturer's shop | 72/100 $3,799Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 72/100 | 72/100 |
| Coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Filtration | 27 | 50 |
| Navigation | 95 | 80 |
| Power | 76 | 73 |
| Automation | 72 | 72 |
| Ease of Use | 65 | 66 |
| Reliability | 72 | 72 |
| Value | 25 | 25 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| What it cleans | ||
| Floor | Yes | Yes |
| Walls | Yes | Yes |
| Waterline | Yes | Yes |
| Surface | Yes | Yes |
| Filtration | ||
| Filter fineness | 150 µm | Not published |
| Debris basket | 4 l | 22 l |
| Baskets | Larger 4.0 l with 150 and 250 μm stages; thinner 3.7 l at 250 μm | Not published |
| Debris capacity | Not published | 22 l, up to two months between emptyings |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Camera + sonar | AI vision |
| Rated pool size | 360 m² | Not published |
| Floor gradient | Not published | Not published |
| Sensors | 27, including an AI camera with two ToF sensors, two infrared and four ultrasonic sensors | Not published |
| Debris detection | AI cruise detection of missed debris; independent cleaning of raised platforms | Not published |
| Automation | ||
| Lifts itself out | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to the edge | Yes | Yes |
| Dock | Yes | Yes |
| Scheduling | No | No |
| Water quality sensing | No | No |
| Remote control | Yes | No |
| Power | ||
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | 13,400 mAh | Not published |
| Runtime | Not published | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Pump flow | 20,820 l/h | Not published |
| Suction, as published | 5,500 GPH | Not published |
| Motors | 11 | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 13.2 kg | Not published |
| L × W × H | 454 × 439 × 277 mm | Not published |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | 36 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Cleaning | ||
| Brushes | Four extra-large roller brushes and two side brushes | Not published |
| Water clarification | ClearWater natural agent dispensed automatically | ClearWater agent |
| Modes | 6 | Not published |
| Chassis | ||
| Wheels | Six guide wheels and two track wheels | Not published |
| Coating | Not published | Automotive-grade IMR |
| Fit | ||
| Pool types | Above-ground and in-ground, all shapes | Not published |
| Dock | ||
| AstroRinse station | Not published | Cleans the filter and empties the debris in three minutes |
| Coverage | ||
| Shallow platforms | Not published | From 35 cm of water |
| Control | ||
| Voice control | Not published | Yes |
Also worth a look
- MOVA85
MOVA Rover X10
MOVA's flagship pool robot: skims the surface, cleans floor, walls, waterline, corners, steps and shallows with a 38,000 l/h pump, maps with an underwater laser, runs six hours a charge and parks at the surface.
- Beatbot72
Beatbot Sora 70
The Sora that skims: twin JetPulse jets pull floating debris in for up to seven hours, then it cleans floor, walls and waterline on a 6,800 GPH pump with a 6 l basket and parks at the surface.
- Beatbot71
Beatbot Sora 10
Beatbot's entry robot: floor, walls, waterline and shallow ledges from 35 cm on a 6,800 GPH pump, a 5 l basket, ultrasonic obstacle sensing, five hours a charge and waterline parking.
Other comparisons
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot AquaSense 2