Head to head · Robot pool cleaners
Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Dreame Z1 Pro
Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Dreame Z1 Pro: Verdict Scores 72 and 69, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra has the higher Verdict Score, 72 to 69.
The Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra has the edge in coverage, filtration, power, automation and reliability. The Dreame Z1 Pro has the edge in value and ease of use.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra is ahead on 2 rows: filter fineness (150 µm against 180 µm) and rated pool size (360 m² against 200 m²). In turn, the Dreame Z1 Pro is ahead on one row: pump flow (30,283 l/h against 20,820 l/h).
At $2,299 against $429, the Dreame Z1 Pro is the cheaper of the two. The Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra suits large freeform pools with steps and raised platforms. The Dreame Z1 Pro suits budget buyers who want walls and the waterline done.
Where the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra is ahead
- Coverage100 · 80
- Filtration27 · 9
- Power76 · 73
- Automation72 · 52
- Reliability73 · 62
- Filter fineness150 µm · 180 µm
- Rated pool size360 m² · 200 m²
Where the Dreame Z1 Pro is ahead
- Ease of Use86 · 65
- Value96 · 25
- Pump flow30,283 l/h · 20,820 l/h
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra | Dreame Z1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
72/100 $2,299Price in the manufacturer's shop | 69/100 $429Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.de | Check price on Amazon.de | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 72/100 | 69/100 |
| Coverage | 100 | 80 |
| Filtration | 27 | 9 |
| Navigation | 95 | 95 |
| Power | 76 | 73 |
| Automation | 72 | 52 |
| Ease of Use | 65 | 86 |
| Reliability | 73 | 62 |
| Value | 25 | 96 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| What it cleans | ||
| Floor | Yes | Yes |
| Walls | Yes | Yes |
| Waterline | Yes | Yes |
| Surface | Yes | No |
| Filtration | ||
| Filter fineness | 150 µm | 180 µm |
| Debris basket | 4 l | Not published |
| Baskets | Larger 4.0 l with 150 and 250 μm stages; thinner 3.7 l at 250 μm | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Camera + sonar | Camera + sonar |
| Rated pool size | 360 m² | 200 m² |
| Floor gradient | Not published | Not published |
| Sensors | 27, including an AI camera with two ToF sensors, two infrared and four ultrasonic sensors | Not published |
| Debris detection | AI cruise detection of missed debris; independent cleaning of raised platforms | Not published |
| Sensing | Not published | Ultrasound and 3D structured light |
| Power | ||
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Pump flow | 20,820 l/h | 30,283 l/h |
| Suction, as published | 5,500 GPH | 8,000 GPH |
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Motors | 11 | Not published |
| Runtime | Not published | 3 h |
| Charging time | Not published | 4 h |
| Pump | Not published | Two pump motors |
| Charging | Not published | Magnetic charger, four to six hours |
| Automation | ||
| Lifts itself out | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to the edge | Yes | Yes |
| Dock | Yes | No |
| Scheduling | No | No |
| Water quality sensing | No | No |
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 13.2 kg | Not published |
| L × W × H | 454 × 439 × 277 mm | Not published |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | Not published |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Cleaning | ||
| Brushes | Four extra-large roller brushes and two side brushes | Dual brushes |
| Water clarification | ClearWater natural agent dispensed automatically | Not published |
| Modes | 6 | Not published |
| Waterline | Not published | Horizontal waterline cleaning |
| Chassis | ||
| Wheels | Six guide wheels and two track wheels | Not published |
| Fit | ||
| Pool types | Above-ground and in-ground, all shapes | Not published |
| Coverage | ||
| Tanning ledges | Not published | Yes, Pro only |
| Control | ||
| Remote | Not published | LiFi handheld remote that reaches the robot under water |
Also worth a look
- MOVA86
Rover X10
MOVA's flagship pool robot: skims the surface, cleans floor, walls, waterline, corners, steps and shallows with a 38,000 l/h pump, maps with an underwater laser, runs six hours a charge and parks at the surface.
- MOVA81
Diver A10
MOVA's fine-debris pool robot: a 3 µm filter in a 3.5 l basket, camera navigation that recognises drains and steps, four hours a charge, schedules and poolside parking, rated for 180 m².
- Beatbot72
AquaSense X
Beatbot's flagship with a self-cleaning station: AstroRinse rinses the filter and empties a 22 l bin, while the robot skims, cleans floor, walls and waterline and parks at the surface.
Other comparisons
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Dreame Z1 Pro vs Dreame Z1
- Dreame Z1 Pro vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Dreame Z1 Pro vs Beatbot AquaSense 2

