Head to head · Robot pool cleaners
MOVA Rover X10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
MOVA Rover X10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro: Verdict Scores 86 and 69, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The MOVA Rover X10 has the higher Verdict Score, 86 to 69.
The MOVA Rover X10 has the edge in coverage, filtration, power, automation and reliability. The Dreame Z1 Pro has the edge in navigation, value and ease of use.
In the manufacturers' published figures the MOVA Rover X10 is ahead on 4 rows, among them filter fineness (3 µm against 180 µm), rated pool size (500 m² against 200 m²) and pump flow (38,000 l/h against 30,283 l/h). No published figure puts the Dreame Z1 Pro ahead.
The MOVA Rover X10 suits large or leafy pools that need skimming and a big basket. The Dreame Z1 Pro suits budget buyers who want walls and the waterline done.
Where the MOVA Rover X10 is ahead
- Coverage100 · 80
- Filtration93 · 9
- Power95 · 73
- Automation72 · 52
- Reliability74 · 62
- Filter fineness3 µm · 180 µm
- Rated pool size500 m² · 200 m²
- Pump flow38,000 l/h · 30,283 l/h
- Runtime6 h · 3 h
Where the Dreame Z1 Pro is ahead
- Navigation95 · 93
- Ease of Use86 · 60
- Value96 · 57
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | MOVA Rover X10 | Dreame Z1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
86/100 ≈ $1,090Price in the manufacturer's shop | 69/100 $429Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.de | Check price on Amazon.de | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 86/100 | 69/100 |
| Coverage | 100 | 80 |
| Filtration | 93 | 9 |
| Navigation | 93 | 95 |
| Power | 95 | 73 |
| Automation | 72 | 52 |
| Ease of Use | 60 | 86 |
| Reliability | 74 | 62 |
| Value | 57 | 96 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| What it cleans | ||
| Floor | Yes | Yes |
| Walls | Yes | Yes |
| Waterline | Yes | Yes |
| Surface | Yes | No |
| Filtration | ||
| Filter fineness | 3 µm | 180 µm |
| Debris basket | 5 l | Not published |
| Filters | 180 μm basket filter and a 3 μm ultrafine filter, both replaceable | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Underwater LiDAR | Camera + sonar |
| Rated pool size | 500 m² | 200 m² |
| Floor gradient | Not published | Not published |
| Dirt detection | AI sensor spots dirt under water and adjusts speed and path | Not published |
| Sensing | Not published | Ultrasound and 3D structured light |
| Power | ||
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Pump flow | 38,000 l/h | 30,283 l/h |
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Motors | 15, including four turbine motors for the FloatDrive system | Not published |
| Runtime | 6 h | 3 h |
| Charging time | Not published | 4 h |
| Suction, as published | Not published | 8,000 GPH |
| Pump | Not published | Two pump motors |
| Charging | Not published | Magnetic charger, four to six hours |
| Automation | ||
| Lifts itself out | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to the edge | Yes | Yes |
| Dock | Yes | No |
| Scheduling | No | No |
| Water quality sensing | No | No |
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 15.8 kg | Not published |
| L × W × H | 540 × 460 × 320 mm | Not published |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | Not published |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Coverage | ||
| Areas cleaned | Surface, floor, walls, waterline, corners, steps and shallow zones | Not published |
| Pool types | All, including concrete | Not published |
| Tanning ledges | Not published | Yes, Pro only |
| Cleaning | ||
| Surface runtime | 12 h | Not published |
| Brushes | Two side brushes; extended front and rear brushes for the waterline | Dual brushes |
| Waterline | Not published | Horizontal waterline cleaning |
| Control | ||
| AquaSonar | A float on the surface relays Wi-Fi to an ultrasonic link for live app control | Not published |
| Remote | Not published | LiFi handheld remote that reaches the robot under water |
| Dock | ||
| Charging | Wireless charging station | Not published |
Also worth a look
- MOVA81
Diver A10
MOVA's fine-debris pool robot: a 3 µm filter in a 3.5 l basket, camera navigation that recognises drains and steps, four hours a charge, schedules and poolside parking, rated for 180 m².
- Beatbot72
AquaSense 2 Ultra
Beatbot's flagship without the self-cleaning station: it skims, cleans floor, walls and waterline, maps with an AI camera, doses a clarifier, parks above the water and charges on a dock.
- Beatbot72
AquaSense X
Beatbot's flagship with a self-cleaning station: AstroRinse rinses the filter and empties a 22 l bin, while the robot skims, cleans floor, walls and waterline and parks at the surface.
Other comparisons
- MOVA Rover X10 vs MOVA Diver A10
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Dreame Z1
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Dreame Z1 Pro vs Dreame Z1
- Dreame Z1 Pro vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Dreame Z1 Pro vs Beatbot AquaSense 2

