Head to head · Robot pool cleaners
MOVA Rover X10 vs Dreame Z1
MOVA Rover X10 or Dreame Z1? Verdict Scores 85 and 68. The Rover X10: filter fineness 3 vs 180 µm, rated pool size 500 vs 180 m².
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

MOVA press image

Dreame press image
Verdict
The MOVA Rover X10 has the higher Verdict Score, 85 to 68.
The MOVA Rover X10 has the edge in coverage, navigation, filtration, power, automation and reliability. The Dreame Z1 has the edge in value and ease of use.
In the manufacturers' published figures the MOVA Rover X10 is ahead on 4 rows, among them filter fineness (3 µm against 180 µm), rated pool size (500 m² against 180 m²) and runtime (6 h against 3 h). No published figure puts the Dreame Z1 ahead.
The MOVA Rover X10 suits large or leafy pools that need skimming and a big basket. The Dreame Z1 suits buyers who find it discounted below the Pro.
Where the MOVA Rover X10 is ahead
- Coverage100 · 80
- Filtration93 · 8
- Navigation93 · 92
- Power95 · 73
- Automation72 · 52
- Reliability73 · 60
- Filter fineness3 µm · 180 µm
- Rated pool size500 m² · 180 m²
- Runtime6 h · 3 h
- Pump flow38,000 l/h · 30,283 l/h
Where the Dreame Z1 is ahead
- Ease of Use66 · 60
- Value97 · 44
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | MOVA MOVA Rover X10 | Dreame Dreame Z1 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
85/100 ≈ $1,300Price in the manufacturer's shop | 68/100 $499Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 85/100 | 68/100 |
| Coverage | 100 | 80 |
| Filtration | 93 | 8 |
| Navigation | 93 | 92 |
| Power | 95 | 73 |
| Automation | 72 | 52 |
| Ease of Use | 60 | 66 |
| Reliability | 73 | 60 |
| Value | 44 | 97 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| What it cleans | ||
| Floor | Yes | Yes |
| Walls | Yes | Yes |
| Waterline | Yes | Yes |
| Surface | Yes | No |
| Filtration | ||
| Filter fineness | 3 µm | 180 µm |
| Debris basket | 5 l | Not published |
| Filters | 180 μm basket filter and a 3 μm ultrafine filter, both replaceable | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Underwater LiDAR | Camera + sonar |
| Rated pool size | 500 m² | 180 m² |
| Floor gradient | Not published | Not published |
| Dirt detection | AI sensor spots dirt under water and adjusts speed and path | Not published |
| Sensing | Not published | Ultrasound and 3D structured light |
| Automation | ||
| Lifts itself out | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to the edge | Yes | Yes |
| Dock | Yes | No |
| Scheduling | No | No |
| Water quality sensing | No | No |
| Remote control | Yes | No |
| Power | ||
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | 15,000 mAh | Not published |
| Runtime | 6 h | 3 h |
| Charging time | Not published | 4 h |
| Pump flow | 38,000 l/h | 30,283 l/h |
| Motors | 15, including four turbine motors for the FloatDrive system | Not published |
| Suction, as published | Not published | 8,000 GPH |
| Pump | Not published | Two pump motors |
| Charging | Not published | Magnetic charger, four to six hours |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 15.8 kg | Not published |
| L × W × H | 540 × 460 × 320 mm | Not published |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | Not published |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Coverage | ||
| Areas cleaned | Surface, floor, walls, waterline, corners, steps and shallow zones | Not published |
| Pool types | All, including concrete | Not published |
| Cleaning | ||
| Surface runtime | 12 h | Not published |
| Brushes | Two side brushes; extended front and rear brushes for the waterline | Dual brushes |
| Waterline | Not published | Horizontal waterline cleaning |
| Control | ||
| AquaSonar | A float on the surface relays Wi-Fi to an ultrasonic link for live app control | Not published |
| Dock | ||
| Charging | Wireless charging station | Not published |
Also worth a look
- MOVA81
MOVA Diver A10
MOVA's fine-debris pool robot: a 3 µm filter in a 3.5 l basket, camera navigation that recognises drains and steps, four hours a charge, schedules and poolside parking, rated for 180 m².
- Beatbot71
Beatbot Sora 10
Beatbot's entry robot: floor, walls, waterline and shallow ledges from 35 cm on a 6,800 GPH pump, a 5 l basket, ultrasonic obstacle sensing, five hours a charge and waterline parking.
- Dreame70
Dreame Z1 Pro
Dreame's better pool robot: floor, walls, waterline and tanning ledges up to 200 m², an 8,000 GPH pump, ultrasound and structured-light sensing and a LiFi remote that works under water.
Other comparisons
- MOVA Rover X10 vs MOVA Diver A10
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Dreame Z1
- Dreame Z1 Pro vs Dreame Z1
- Dreame Z1 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Dreame Z1 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2