Head to head · Robot pool cleaners
Beatbot Sora 70 vs Dreame Z1
Beatbot Sora 70 or Dreame Z1? Verdict Scores 72 and 68. The Sora 70: rated pool size 300 vs 180 m²; the Z1: pump flow 30,283 vs 25,740 l/h.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

Beatbot press image

Dreame press image
Verdict
The Beatbot Sora 70 has the higher Verdict Score, 72 to 68.
The Beatbot Sora 70 has the edge in coverage, filtration, power, ease of use and reliability. The Dreame Z1 has the edge in navigation and value.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Beatbot Sora 70 is ahead on 3 rows: filter fineness (150 µm against 180 µm), rated pool size (300 m² against 180 m²) and runtime (5 h against 3 h). In turn, the Dreame Z1 is ahead on 2 rows: charging time (4 h against 4 h 30 min) and pump flow (30,283 l/h against 25,740 l/h).
At $1,099 against $499, the Dreame Z1 is the cheaper of the two. The Beatbot Sora 70 suits tree-lined pools where leaves land daily. The Dreame Z1 suits buyers who find it discounted below the Pro.
Where the Beatbot Sora 70 is ahead
- Coverage100 · 80
- Filtration42 · 8
- Power91 · 73
- Ease of Use84 · 66
- Reliability72 · 60
- Filter fineness150 µm · 180 µm
- Rated pool size300 m² · 180 m²
- Runtime5 h · 3 h
Where the Dreame Z1 is ahead
- Navigation92 · 73
- Value97 · 44
- Charging time4 h · 4 h 30 min
- Pump flow30,283 l/h · 25,740 l/h
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Beatbot Beatbot Sora 70 | Dreame Dreame Z1 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
72/100 $1,099Price in the manufacturer's shop | 68/100 $499Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 72/100 | 68/100 |
| Coverage | 100 | 80 |
| Filtration | 42 | 8 |
| Navigation | 73 | 92 |
| Power | 91 | 73 |
| Automation | 52 | 52 |
| Ease of Use | 84 | 66 |
| Reliability | 72 | 60 |
| Value | 44 | 97 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| What it cleans | ||
| Floor | Yes | Yes |
| Walls | Yes | Yes |
| Waterline | Yes | Yes |
| Surface | Yes | No |
| Filtration | ||
| Filter fineness | 150 µm | 180 µm |
| Debris basket | 6 l | Not published |
| Optional filter | 3 μm basket sold separately | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Ultrasonic | Camera + sonar |
| Rated pool size | 300 m² | 180 m² |
| Floor gradient | Not published | Not published |
| Sensors | 18, including two ultrasonic sensors | Not published |
| Sensing | Not published | Ultrasound and 3D structured light |
| Automation | ||
| Lifts itself out | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to the edge | Yes | Yes |
| Dock | No | No |
| Scheduling | No | No |
| Water quality sensing | No | No |
| Remote control | Yes | No |
| Power | ||
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | 10,000 mAh | Not published |
| Runtime | 5 h | 3 h |
| Charging time | 4 h 30 min | 4 h |
| Pump flow | 25,740 l/h | 30,283 l/h |
| Suction, as published | 6,800 GPH | 8,000 GPH |
| Motors | 8 | Not published |
| Charging | 65 W through a titanium plug | Magnetic charger, four to six hours |
| Pump | Not published | Two pump motors |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 10.4 kg | Not published |
| L × W × H | 434 × 429 × 284 mm | Not published |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | Not published |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Cleaning | ||
| Surface runtime | 7 h | Not published |
| Surface cleaning | JetPulse twin jets pull floating debris inward | Not published |
| Brushes | Four bottom roller brushes in two groups; 17 cm suction inlet | Dual brushes |
| Modes | Surface, floor, wall, pro, standard, eco | Not published |
| Waterline | Not published | Horizontal waterline cleaning |
| Coverage | ||
| Shallow water | From 20 cm; platforms of at least 1 × 1 m | Not published |
Also worth a look
- MOVA85
MOVA Rover X10
MOVA's flagship pool robot: skims the surface, cleans floor, walls, waterline, corners, steps and shallows with a 38,000 l/h pump, maps with an underwater laser, runs six hours a charge and parks at the surface.
- Dreame70
Dreame Z1 Pro
Dreame's better pool robot: floor, walls, waterline and tanning ledges up to 200 m², an 8,000 GPH pump, ultrasound and structured-light sensing and a LiFi remote that works under water.
- Beatbot71
Beatbot Sora 10
Beatbot's entry robot: floor, walls, waterline and shallow ledges from 35 cm on a 6,800 GPH pump, a 5 l basket, ultrasonic obstacle sensing, five hours a charge and waterline parking.
Other comparisons
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Dreame Z1
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Dreame Z1
- Dreame Z1 Pro vs Dreame Z1
- Dreame Z1 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Dreame Z1 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2