Head to head · Robot pool cleaners
MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 30
MOVA Rover X10 or Beatbot Sora 30? Verdict Scores 85 and 65. The Rover X10: rated pool size 500 vs 300 m², warranty 36 vs 24 months.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

MOVA press image

Beatbot press image
Verdict
The MOVA Rover X10 has the higher Verdict Score, 85 to 65.
The MOVA Rover X10 has the edge in coverage, navigation, filtration, power, automation, value and reliability. The Beatbot Sora 30 has the edge in ease of use.
In the manufacturers' published figures the MOVA Rover X10 is ahead on 3 rows: rated pool size (500 m² against 300 m²), pump flow (38,000 l/h against 25,740 l/h) and warranty (36 months against 24 months). No published figure puts the Beatbot Sora 30 ahead.
The MOVA Rover X10 suits large or leafy pools that need skimming and a big basket. The Beatbot Sora 30 suits rectangular pools with steps or a tanning ledge.
Where the MOVA Rover X10 is ahead
- Coverage100 · 80
- Filtration93 · 43
- Navigation93 · 73
- Power95 · 77
- Automation72 · 52
- Reliability73 · 60
- Value44 · 43
- Rated pool size500 m² · 300 m²
- Pump flow38,000 l/h · 25,740 l/h
- Warranty36 months · 24 months
Where the Beatbot Sora 30 is ahead
- Ease of Use74 · 60
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | MOVA MOVA Rover X10 | Beatbot Beatbot Sora 30 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
85/100 ≈ $1,300Price in the manufacturer's shop | 65/100 $999Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 85/100 | 65/100 |
| Coverage | 100 | 80 |
| Filtration | 93 | 43 |
| Navigation | 93 | 73 |
| Power | 95 | 77 |
| Automation | 72 | 52 |
| Ease of Use | 60 | 74 |
| Reliability | 73 | 60 |
| Value | 44 | 43 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| What it cleans | ||
| Floor | Yes | Yes |
| Walls | Yes | Yes |
| Waterline | Yes | Yes |
| Surface | Yes | No |
| Filtration | ||
| Filter fineness | 3 µm | Not published |
| Debris basket | 5 l | 5 l |
| Filters | 180 μm basket filter and a 3 μm ultrafine filter, both replaceable | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Underwater LiDAR | Ultrasonic |
| Rated pool size | 500 m² | 300 m² |
| Floor gradient | Not published | Not published |
| Dirt detection | AI sensor spots dirt under water and adjusts speed and path | Not published |
| Sensors | Not published | 13, including 2 ultrasonic |
| Automation | ||
| Lifts itself out | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to the edge | Yes | Yes |
| Dock | Yes | No |
| Scheduling | No | No |
| Water quality sensing | No | No |
| Remote control | Yes | No |
| Power | ||
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | 15,000 mAh | Not published |
| Runtime | 6 h | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | 4 h 30 min |
| Pump flow | 38,000 l/h | 25,740 l/h |
| Motors | 15, including four turbine motors for the FloatDrive system | Not published |
| Suction, as published | Not published | 6,800 GPH |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 15.8 kg | 8.89 kg |
| L × W × H | 540 × 460 × 320 mm | 434 × 386 × 267 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | 24 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Coverage | ||
| Areas cleaned | Surface, floor, walls, waterline, corners, steps and shallow zones | Not published |
| Pool types | All, including concrete | Not published |
| Shallow water | Not published | Operates from 8 in deep; platforms from 3.3 × 3.3 ft |
| Cleaning | ||
| Surface runtime | 12 h | Not published |
| Brushes | Two side brushes; extended front and rear brushes for the waterline | 4 |
| Control | ||
| AquaSonar | A float on the surface relays Wi-Fi to an ultrasonic link for live app control | Not published |
| Dock | ||
| Charging | Wireless charging station | Not published |
Also worth a look
- MOVA81
MOVA Diver A10
MOVA's fine-debris pool robot: a 3 µm filter in a 3.5 l basket, camera navigation that recognises drains and steps, four hours a charge, schedules and poolside parking, rated for 180 m².
- Beatbot72
Beatbot Sora 70
The Sora that skims: twin JetPulse jets pull floating debris in for up to seven hours, then it cleans floor, walls and waterline on a 6,800 GPH pump with a 6 l basket and parks at the surface.
- Beatbot62
Beatbot AquaSense 2
Cordless floor, wall and waterline cleaner on a 5,500 GPH pump with a 2 l basket and 16 sensors, rated for 300 m², that surfaces and parks at the edge when it is done or the battery runs low.
Other comparisons
- MOVA Rover X10 vs MOVA Diver A10
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Dreame Z1
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Dreame Z1 Pro vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Dreame Z1 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot Sora 30 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2