Head to head · Robot pool cleaners
MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
MOVA Rover X10 or Beatbot AquaSense 2? Verdict Scores 85 and 62. The Rover X10: debris basket 5 vs 2 l, pump flow 38,000 vs 20,820 l/h.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

MOVA press image

Beatbot press image
Verdict
The MOVA Rover X10 has the higher Verdict Score, 85 to 62.
The MOVA Rover X10 has the edge in coverage, navigation, filtration, power, automation and reliability. The Beatbot AquaSense 2 has the edge in value and ease of use.
In the manufacturers' published figures the MOVA Rover X10 is ahead on 3 rows: debris basket (5 l against 2 l), rated pool size (500 m² against 300 m²) and pump flow (38,000 l/h against 20,820 l/h). No published figure puts the Beatbot AquaSense 2 ahead.
The MOVA Rover X10 suits large or leafy pools that need skimming and a big basket. The Beatbot AquaSense 2 suits owners tired of retrieving a robot from the deep end.
Where the MOVA Rover X10 is ahead
- Coverage100 · 80
- Filtration93 · 20
- Navigation93 · 73
- Power95 · 76
- Automation72 · 52
- Reliability73 · 59
- Debris basket5 l · 2 l
- Rated pool size500 m² · 300 m²
- Pump flow38,000 l/h · 20,820 l/h
Where the Beatbot AquaSense 2 is ahead
- Ease of Use64 · 60
- Value51 · 44
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | MOVA MOVA Rover X10 | Beatbot Beatbot AquaSense 2 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
85/100 ≈ $1,300Price in the manufacturer's shop | 62/100 $799Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 85/100 | 62/100 |
| Coverage | 100 | 80 |
| Filtration | 93 | 20 |
| Navigation | 93 | 73 |
| Power | 95 | 76 |
| Automation | 72 | 52 |
| Ease of Use | 60 | 64 |
| Reliability | 73 | 59 |
| Value | 44 | 51 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| What it cleans | ||
| Floor | Yes | Yes |
| Walls | Yes | Yes |
| Waterline | Yes | Yes |
| Surface | Yes | No |
| Filtration | ||
| Filter fineness | 3 µm | Not published |
| Debris basket | 5 l | 2 l |
| Filters | 180 μm basket filter and a 3 μm ultrafine filter, both replaceable | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Underwater LiDAR | Ultrasonic |
| Rated pool size | 500 m² | 300 m² |
| Floor gradient | Not published | Not published |
| Dirt detection | AI sensor spots dirt under water and adjusts speed and path | Not published |
| Sensors | Not published | 16, including 2 ultrasonic |
| Automation | ||
| Lifts itself out | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to the edge | Yes | Yes |
| Dock | Yes | No |
| Scheduling | No | No |
| Water quality sensing | No | No |
| Remote control | Yes | No |
| Power | ||
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | 15,000 mAh | 10,000 mAh |
| Runtime | 6 h | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Pump flow | 38,000 l/h | 20,820 l/h |
| Motors | 15, including four turbine motors for the FloatDrive system | Not published |
| Suction, as published | Not published | 5,500 GPH |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 15.8 kg | 10.47 kg |
| L × W × H | 540 × 460 × 320 mm | Not published |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | Not published |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Coverage | ||
| Areas cleaned | Surface, floor, walls, waterline, corners, steps and shallow zones | Not published |
| Pool types | All, including concrete | Not published |
| Cleaning | ||
| Surface runtime | 12 h | Not published |
| Brushes | Two side brushes; extended front and rear brushes for the waterline | Not published |
| Control | ||
| AquaSonar | A float on the surface relays Wi-Fi to an ultrasonic link for live app control | Not published |
| Dock | ||
| Charging | Wireless charging station | Not published |
Also worth a look
- MOVA81
MOVA Diver A10
MOVA's fine-debris pool robot: a 3 µm filter in a 3.5 l basket, camera navigation that recognises drains and steps, four hours a charge, schedules and poolside parking, rated for 180 m².
- Beatbot65
Beatbot Sora 30
The sensible Beatbot: floor, walls, waterline and shallow platforms from 20 cm of water on a 6,800 GPH pump with a 5 l basket, S-shaped paths, and it floats to the surface when done.
- Beatbot54
Beatbot AquaSense
Beatbot's first robot: floor, walls and waterline on a 5,500 GPH pump with ultrasonic mapping, a 2 l basket, a 150 μm filter and a 210 m² rating, but no surface parking.
Other comparisons
- MOVA Rover X10 vs MOVA Diver A10
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Dreame Z1
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- Dreame Z1 Pro vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- Dreame Z1 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- Beatbot Sora 30 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2