Head to head · Robot pool cleaners
MOVA Rover X10 vs MOVA Diver A10
MOVA Rover X10 or Diver A10? The Rover X10: rated pool size 500 vs 180 m², pump flow 38,000 vs 22,700 l/h. Verdict Scores 85 and 81.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

MOVA press image

MOVA press image
Verdict
The MOVA Rover X10 has the higher Verdict Score, 85 to 81.
The MOVA Rover X10 has the edge in coverage, navigation, filtration, power, automation and reliability. The MOVA Diver A10 has the edge in value and ease of use.
In the manufacturers' published figures the MOVA Rover X10 is ahead on 4 rows, among them debris basket (5 l against 3.5 l), rated pool size (500 m² against 180 m²) and runtime (6 h against 4 h). No published figure puts the MOVA Diver A10 ahead.
The MOVA Rover X10 suits large or leafy pools that need skimming and a big basket. The MOVA Diver A10 suits pools with fine sand, silt or pollen.
Where the MOVA Rover X10 is ahead
- Coverage100 · 80
- Filtration93 · 81
- Navigation93 · 86
- Power95 · 83
- Automation72 · 66
- Reliability73 · 60
- Debris basket5 l · 3.5 l
- Rated pool size500 m² · 180 m²
- Runtime6 h · 4 h
- Pump flow38,000 l/h · 22,700 l/h
Where the MOVA Diver A10 is ahead
- Ease of Use73 · 60
- Value100 · 44
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | MOVA MOVA Rover X10 | MOVA MOVA Diver A10 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
85/100 ≈ $1,300Price in the manufacturer's shop | 81/100 $699Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 85/100 | 81/100 |
| Coverage | 100 | 80 |
| Filtration | 93 | 81 |
| Navigation | 93 | 86 |
| Power | 95 | 83 |
| Automation | 72 | 66 |
| Ease of Use | 60 | 73 |
| Reliability | 73 | 60 |
| Value | 44 | 100 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| What it cleans | ||
| Floor | Yes | Yes |
| Walls | Yes | Yes |
| Waterline | Yes | Yes |
| Surface | Yes | No |
| Filtration | ||
| Filter fineness | 3 µm | 3 µm |
| Debris basket | 5 l | 3.5 l |
| Filters | 180 μm basket filter and a 3 μm ultrafine filter, both replaceable | Not published |
| Filter | Not published | 3 µm replaceable ultra-fine mesh |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Underwater LiDAR | AI vision |
| Rated pool size | 500 m² | 180 m² |
| Floor gradient | Not published | Not published |
| Dirt detection | AI sensor spots dirt under water and adjusts speed and path | Not published |
| Sensors | Not published | 6, optical, with AI object recognition |
| Automation | ||
| Lifts itself out | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to the edge | Yes | Yes |
| Dock | Yes | No |
| Scheduling | No | Yes |
| Water quality sensing | No | No |
| Remote control | Yes | No |
| Power | ||
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | 15,000 mAh | 169 Wh |
| Runtime | 6 h | 4 h |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Pump flow | 38,000 l/h | 22,700 l/h |
| Motors | 15, including four turbine motors for the FloatDrive system | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 15.8 kg | 9 kg |
| L × W × H | 540 × 460 × 320 mm | 425 × 386 × 234 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | Not published |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Coverage | ||
| Areas cleaned | Surface, floor, walls, waterline, corners, steps and shallow zones | Not published |
| Pool types | All, including concrete | Not published |
| Reach above waterline | Not published | 2 in |
| Cleaning | ||
| Surface runtime | 12 h | Not published |
| Brushes | Two side brushes; extended front and rear brushes for the waterline | Not published |
| Control | ||
| AquaSonar | A float on the surface relays Wi-Fi to an ultrasonic link for live app control | Not published |
| Dock | ||
| Charging | Wireless charging station | Not published |
Also worth a look
- Beatbot72
Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
Beatbot's flagship without the self-cleaning station: it skims, cleans floor, walls and waterline, maps with an AI camera, doses a clarifier, parks above the water and charges on a dock.
- Beatbot62
Beatbot AquaSense 2
Cordless floor, wall and waterline cleaner on a 5,500 GPH pump with a 2 l basket and 16 sensors, rated for 300 m², that surfaces and parks at the edge when it is done or the battery runs low.
- Beatbot54
Beatbot AquaSense
Beatbot's first robot: floor, walls and waterline on a 5,500 GPH pump with ultrasonic mapping, a 2 l basket, a 150 μm filter and a 210 m² rating, but no surface parking.
Other comparisons
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Dreame Z1
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Dreame Z1
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2