Head to head · Robot pool cleaners
MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 10
MOVA Diver A10 or Beatbot Sora 10? Verdict Scores 81 and 71. The Diver A10: filter fineness 3 vs 150 µm; the Sora 10: rated pool size 300 vs 180 m².
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

MOVA press image

Beatbot press image
Verdict
The MOVA Diver A10 has the higher Verdict Score, 81 to 71.
The MOVA Diver A10 has the edge in navigation, filtration, automation and value. The Beatbot Sora 10 has the edge in power and ease of use.
In the manufacturers' published figures the MOVA Diver A10 is ahead on one row: filter fineness (3 µm against 150 µm). In turn, the Beatbot Sora 10 is ahead on 4 rows, among them debris basket (5 l against 3.5 l), rated pool size (300 m² against 180 m²) and runtime (5 h against 4 h).
At $699 against $469, the Beatbot Sora 10 is the cheaper of the two. The MOVA Diver A10 suits pools with fine sand, silt or pollen. The Beatbot Sora 10 suits pools with tanning ledges and steps on a budget.
Where the MOVA Diver A10 is ahead
- Filtration81 · 35
- Navigation86 · 73
- Automation66 · 52
- Value100 · 96
- Filter fineness3 µm · 150 µm
Where the Beatbot Sora 10 is ahead
- Power94 · 83
- Ease of Use77 · 73
- Debris basket5 l · 3.5 l
- Rated pool size300 m² · 180 m²
- Runtime5 h · 4 h
- Pump flow25,740 l/h · 22,700 l/h
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | MOVA MOVA Diver A10 | Beatbot Beatbot Sora 10 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
81/100 $699Price in the manufacturer's shop | 71/100 $469Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 81/100 | 71/100 |
| Coverage | 80 | 80 |
| Filtration | 81 | 35 |
| Navigation | 86 | 73 |
| Power | 83 | 94 |
| Automation | 66 | 52 |
| Ease of Use | 73 | 77 |
| Reliability | 60 | 60 |
| Value | 100 | 96 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| What it cleans | ||
| Floor | Yes | Yes |
| Walls | Yes | Yes |
| Waterline | Yes | Yes |
| Surface | No | No |
| Filtration | ||
| Filter fineness | 3 µm | 150 µm |
| Debris basket | 3.5 l | 5 l |
| Filter | 3 µm replaceable ultra-fine mesh | Not published |
| Optional filter | Not published | 3 μm ultra-fine basket sold separately |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | AI vision | Ultrasonic |
| Rated pool size | 180 m² | 300 m² |
| Floor gradient | Not published | Not published |
| Sensors | 6, optical, with AI object recognition | 11, including one ultrasonic sensor |
| Automation | ||
| Lifts itself out | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to the edge | Yes | Yes |
| Dock | No | No |
| Scheduling | Yes | No |
| Water quality sensing | No | No |
| Remote control | No | No |
| Power | ||
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | 169 Wh | 7,800 mAh |
| Runtime | 4 h | 5 h |
| Charging time | Not published | 3 h 30 min |
| Pump flow | 22,700 l/h | 25,740 l/h |
| Suction, as published | Not published | 6,800 GPH |
| Motors | Not published | 3 |
| Charging | Not published | 65 W through a titanium plug |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 9 kg | 8.5 kg |
| L × W × H | 425 × 386 × 234 mm | 432 × 386 × 267 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | Not published | 24 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Coverage | ||
| Reach above waterline | 2 in | Not published |
| Shallow water | Not published | From 35 cm; platforms of at least 1 × 1 m |
| Cleaning | ||
| Brushes | Not published | Two front roller brushes with differential speed; 17 cm suction inlet |
| Modes | Not published | Floor, wall, standard, eco |
Also worth a look
- MOVA85
MOVA Rover X10
MOVA's flagship pool robot: skims the surface, cleans floor, walls, waterline, corners, steps and shallows with a 38,000 l/h pump, maps with an underwater laser, runs six hours a charge and parks at the surface.
- Dreame70
Dreame Z1 Pro
Dreame's better pool robot: floor, walls, waterline and tanning ledges up to 200 m², an 8,000 GPH pump, ultrasound and structured-light sensing and a LiFi remote that works under water.
- Dreame68
Dreame Z1
Dreame's plain Z1: floor, walls and waterline up to 180 m² on an 8,000 GPH pump, ultrasound and structured-light sensing and poolside parking, without the Pro's remote and ledge cleaning.
Other comparisons
- MOVA Rover X10 vs MOVA Diver A10
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Dreame Z1
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2