Head to head · Robot pool cleaners
MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra: Verdict Scores 81 and 72, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The MOVA Diver A10 has the higher Verdict Score, 81 to 72.
The MOVA Diver A10 has the edge in filtration, power, value and ease of use. The Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra has the edge in coverage, navigation, automation and reliability.
In the manufacturers' published figures the MOVA Diver A10 is ahead on 2 rows: filter fineness (3 µm against 150 µm) and pump flow (22,700 l/h against 20,820 l/h). In turn, the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra is ahead on 2 rows: debris basket (4 l against 3.5 l) and rated pool size (360 m² against 180 m²).
At $699 against $2,299, the MOVA Diver A10 is the cheaper of the two. The MOVA Diver A10 suits pools with fine sand, silt or pollen. The Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra suits large freeform pools with steps and raised platforms.
Where the MOVA Diver A10 is ahead
- Filtration81 · 27
- Power83 · 76
- Ease of Use73 · 65
- Value100 · 25
- Filter fineness3 µm · 150 µm
- Pump flow22,700 l/h · 20,820 l/h
Where the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra is ahead
- Coverage100 · 80
- Navigation95 · 86
- Automation72 · 66
- Reliability73 · 62
- Debris basket4 l · 3.5 l
- Rated pool size360 m² · 180 m²
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | MOVA Diver A10 | Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
81/100 $699Price in the manufacturer's shop | 72/100 $2,299Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.de | Check price on Amazon.de | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 81/100 | 72/100 |
| Coverage | 80 | 100 |
| Filtration | 81 | 27 |
| Navigation | 86 | 95 |
| Power | 83 | 76 |
| Automation | 66 | 72 |
| Ease of Use | 73 | 65 |
| Reliability | 62 | 73 |
| Value | 100 | 25 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| What it cleans | ||
| Floor | Yes | Yes |
| Walls | Yes | Yes |
| Waterline | Yes | Yes |
| Surface | No | Yes |
| Filtration | ||
| Filter fineness | 3 µm | 150 µm |
| Debris basket | 3.5 l | 4 l |
| Filter | 3 µm replaceable ultra-fine mesh | Not published |
| Baskets | Not published | Larger 4.0 l with 150 and 250 μm stages; thinner 3.7 l at 250 μm |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | AI vision | Camera + sonar |
| Rated pool size | 180 m² | 360 m² |
| Floor gradient | Not published | Not published |
| Sensors | 6, optical, with AI object recognition | 27, including an AI camera with two ToF sensors, two infrared and four ultrasonic sensors |
| Debris detection | Not published | AI cruise detection of missed debris; independent cleaning of raised platforms |
| Power | ||
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Pump flow | 22,700 l/h | 20,820 l/h |
| Battery | 169 Wh | Not published |
| Runtime | 4 h | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Suction, as published | Not published | 5,500 GPH |
| Motors | Not published | 11 |
| Automation | ||
| Lifts itself out | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to the edge | Yes | Yes |
| Dock | No | Yes |
| Scheduling | Yes | No |
| Water quality sensing | No | No |
| Remote control | No | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 9 kg | 13.2 kg |
| L × W × H | 425 × 386 × 234 mm | 454 × 439 × 277 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | Not published | 36 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Coverage | ||
| Reach above waterline | 2 in | Not published |
| Cleaning | ||
| Brushes | Not published | Four extra-large roller brushes and two side brushes |
| Water clarification | Not published | ClearWater natural agent dispensed automatically |
| Modes | Not published | 6 |
| Chassis | ||
| Wheels | Not published | Six guide wheels and two track wheels |
| Fit | ||
| Pool types | Not published | Above-ground and in-ground, all shapes |
Also worth a look
- MOVA86
Rover X10
MOVA's flagship pool robot: skims the surface, cleans floor, walls, waterline, corners, steps and shallows with a 38,000 l/h pump, maps with an underwater laser, runs six hours a charge and parks at the surface.
- Beatbot72
AquaSense X
Beatbot's flagship with a self-cleaning station: AstroRinse rinses the filter and empties a 22 l bin, while the robot skims, cleans floor, walls and waterline and parks at the surface.
- Beatbot72
Sora 70
The Sora that skims: twin JetPulse jets pull floating debris in for up to seven hours, then it cleans floor, walls and waterline on a 6,800 GPH pump with a 6 l basket and parks at the surface.
Other comparisons
- MOVA Rover X10 vs MOVA Diver A10
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Dreame Z1
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 70
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 10
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Dreame Z1
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Beatbot AquaSense 2

