Head to head · Robot pool cleaners
MOVA Diver A10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
MOVA Diver A10 or Dreame Z1 Pro? Verdict Scores 81 and 70. The Diver A10: filter fineness 3 vs 180 µm; the Z1 Pro: pump flow 30,283 vs 22,700 l/h.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

MOVA press image

Dreame press image
Verdict
The MOVA Diver A10 has the higher Verdict Score, 81 to 70.
The MOVA Diver A10 has the edge in filtration, power and automation. The Dreame Z1 Pro has the edge in navigation and ease of use.
In the manufacturers' published figures the MOVA Diver A10 is ahead on 2 rows: filter fineness (3 µm against 180 µm) and runtime (4 h against 3 h). In turn, the Dreame Z1 Pro is ahead on 2 rows: rated pool size (200 m² against 180 m²) and pump flow (30,283 l/h against 22,700 l/h).
At $699 against $429, the Dreame Z1 Pro is the cheaper of the two. The MOVA Diver A10 suits pools with fine sand, silt or pollen. The Dreame Z1 Pro suits budget buyers who want walls and the waterline done.
Where the MOVA Diver A10 is ahead
- Filtration81 · 8
- Power83 · 73
- Automation66 · 52
- Filter fineness3 µm · 180 µm
- Runtime4 h · 3 h
Where the Dreame Z1 Pro is ahead
- Navigation95 · 86
- Ease of Use86 · 73
- Rated pool size200 m² · 180 m²
- Pump flow30,283 l/h · 22,700 l/h
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | MOVA MOVA Diver A10 | Dreame Dreame Z1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
81/100 $699Price in the manufacturer's shop | 70/100 $429Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 81/100 | 70/100 |
| Coverage | 80 | 80 |
| Filtration | 81 | 8 |
| Navigation | 86 | 95 |
| Power | 83 | 73 |
| Automation | 66 | 52 |
| Ease of Use | 73 | 86 |
| Reliability | 60 | 60 |
| Value | 100 | 100 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| What it cleans | ||
| Floor | Yes | Yes |
| Walls | Yes | Yes |
| Waterline | Yes | Yes |
| Surface | No | No |
| Filtration | ||
| Filter fineness | 3 µm | 180 µm |
| Debris basket | 3.5 l | Not published |
| Filter | 3 µm replaceable ultra-fine mesh | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | AI vision | Camera + sonar |
| Rated pool size | 180 m² | 200 m² |
| Floor gradient | Not published | Not published |
| Sensors | 6, optical, with AI object recognition | Not published |
| Sensing | Not published | Ultrasound and 3D structured light |
| Automation | ||
| Lifts itself out | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to the edge | Yes | Yes |
| Dock | No | No |
| Scheduling | Yes | No |
| Water quality sensing | No | No |
| Remote control | No | Yes |
| Power | ||
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | 169 Wh | Not published |
| Runtime | 4 h | 3 h |
| Charging time | Not published | 4 h |
| Pump flow | 22,700 l/h | 30,283 l/h |
| Suction, as published | Not published | 8,000 GPH |
| Pump | Not published | Two pump motors |
| Charging | Not published | Magnetic charger, four to six hours |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 9 kg | Not published |
| L × W × H | 425 × 386 × 234 mm | Not published |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | Not published | Not published |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Coverage | ||
| Reach above waterline | 2 in | Not published |
| Tanning ledges | Not published | Yes, Pro only |
| Cleaning | ||
| Brushes | Not published | Dual brushes |
| Waterline | Not published | Horizontal waterline cleaning |
| Control | ||
| Remote | Not published | LiFi handheld remote that reaches the robot under water |
Also worth a look
- MOVA85
MOVA Rover X10
MOVA's flagship pool robot: skims the surface, cleans floor, walls, waterline, corners, steps and shallows with a 38,000 l/h pump, maps with an underwater laser, runs six hours a charge and parks at the surface.
- Beatbot71
Beatbot Sora 10
Beatbot's entry robot: floor, walls, waterline and shallow ledges from 35 cm on a 6,800 GPH pump, a 5 l basket, ultrasonic obstacle sensing, five hours a charge and waterline parking.
- Dreame68
Dreame Z1
Dreame's plain Z1: floor, walls and waterline up to 180 m² on an 8,000 GPH pump, ultrasound and structured-light sensing and poolside parking, without the Pro's remote and ledge cleaning.
Other comparisons
- MOVA Rover X10 vs MOVA Diver A10
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense X
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 70
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 10
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Dreame Z1
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot Sora 30
- MOVA Diver A10 vs Beatbot AquaSense 2
- MOVA Rover X10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot AquaSense X vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot Sora 70 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Beatbot Sora 10 vs Dreame Z1 Pro
- Dreame Z1 Pro vs Dreame Z1
- Dreame Z1 Pro vs Beatbot Sora 30
- Dreame Z1 Pro vs Beatbot AquaSense 2