ROBOVERDICT

Head to head · Robot lawn mowers

Segway Navimow X450 vs Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000

Segway Navimow X450 or Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000? Verdict Scores 88 and 85. The X450: zones 120 vs 30. The LUBA 3 AWD 3000 leads on navigation.

Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated

Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

Verdict

The Segway Navimow X450 has the higher Verdict Score, 88 to 85.

The Segway Navimow X450 has the edge in cutting and reliability. The Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000 has the edge in navigation, obstacle avoidance, value and features.

In the manufacturers' published figures the Segway Navimow X450 is ahead on 6 rows, among them max lawn area (5,000 m² against 3,000 m²), zones (120 against 30) and cutting width (430 mm against 400 mm). In turn, the Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000 is ahead on one row: runtime (2 h 55 min against 2 h 10 min).

The Segway Navimow X450 suits open lawns from 3,000 to 5,000 m², sloped or rough. The Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000 suits sloped plots between 1,500 and 3,000 m².

Segway Navimow
Segway Navimow X450≈ $3,480
Mammotion
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000$2,799

Where the Segway Navimow X450 is ahead

  • Cutting99 · 72
  • Reliability83 · 78
  • Max lawn area5,000 m² (1.24 acres) · 3,000 m² (0.74 acres)
  • Zones120 · 30
  • Cutting width430 mm · 400 mm
  • Max slope84% (40°) · 80% (39°)
  • Charging time1 h 40 min · 2 h
  • Noise68 dB · 70 dB

Where the Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000 is ahead

  • Navigation100 · 97
  • Obstacle Avoidance100 · 85
  • Features95 · 90
  • Value29 · 25
  • Runtime2 h 55 min · 2 h 10 min

Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.

Full specification, side by side

Compare
Segway Navimow
Segway Navimow X450
Mammotion
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000
Segway Navimow X450
Segway Navimow press image
Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000
Mammotion press image
≈ $3,480Price in the manufacturer's shop
$2,799Price in the manufacturer's shop
Highest Verdict Score
Check priceCheck price on Amazon.com

Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

At a glance
Leads on
  • Cutting
  • Reliability
  • Navigation
  • Obstacle Avoidance
  • Features
  • Value
Pros
  • 1,300 m² and 130 minutes a charge from a 15 Ah battery; 600 m² an hour
  • 84% slope rating on four-wheel drive with dual suspension, and a 7 cm vertical step
  • 43 cm twin-disc deck, two 180 W motors, 20 to 95 mm cutting height
  • LiDAR, network RTK and two cameras together; no antenna to install
  • 165 W cutting motors on a 400 mm twin-disc deck
  • 1,400 m² and 175 minutes a charge, 120 minutes to recharge
Cons
  • The extra money over the X420 buys a bigger battery and a second year of data, nothing else
  • 29.2 kg and 85 cm long, no passage width stated
  • 68 dB, the loudest Navimow
  • No edge cutting, so a border strip still needs trimming
  • 70 cm minimum passage and a 69 cm long chassis
  • 70 dB stated, and 19 kg to lift
Best for
  • Open lawns from 3,000 to 5,000 m², sloped or rough
  • Estates and paddocks where mowing hours per day matter
  • Sloped plots between 1,500 and 3,000 m²
  • Thick, fast-growing grass and gardens with tree cover
Score breakdown
Verdict Score88/10085/100
Navigation
97
100
Cutting
99
72
Terrain
100
100
Obstacle Avoidance
85
100
Ease of Use
100
100
Reliability
83
78
Features
90
95
Value
25
29
Specifications

In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked.

Coverage
Max lawn area5,000 m² (1.24 acres)3,000 m² (0.74 acres)
Zones12030
Navigation
NavigationRTK-GNSS + visionRTK-GNSS + vision + LiDAR
Boundary wireNot requiredNot required
Obstacle avoidance3D time-of-flightCamera + LiDAR fusion
GNSS antenna in the boxOptional local base station instead of network RTKNot published
LiDAR rangeNot published70 m
LiDAR field of viewNot published360° × 59°
Cutting
Cutting width430 mm400 mm
Cutting height20–95 mm25–70 mm
Edge cuttingYesNo
Cutting motors2 × 180 WNot published
Floating deck and anti-clogging discsYesNot published
Cutting height adjustmentFrom the appNot published
Cutting discsNot published2, six pivoting blades each
Cutting motor powerNot published165 W per disc
Terrain
Max slope84% (40°)80% (39°)
DrivetrainAWDAWD
Vertical step7 cmNot published
SteeringEccentric front wheels, two steering motors, dual suspensionNot published
Power
Battery15,000 mAh259 Wh
Runtime2 h 10 min2 h 55 min
Charging time1 h 40 min2 h
Area per charge1,300 m²1,400 m²
Mowing rate600 m²/h500 m²/h
Time for the rated area15 hoursNot published
Battery warranty2 yearsNot published
Battery voltageNot published21.6 V
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
4G / LTEYesYes
GPSYesYes
Cellular plan2 years free, then €29.90 a yearNot published
On-device display3.5-inch colour LCDNot published
Smart homeAlexa, Google HomeNot published
Physical
Weight29.2 kg19 kg
L × W × H850 × 610 × 351 mm690 × 533 × 279 mm
Noise68 dB70 dB
Weather sealingIP66IPX6
Support
Warranty36 months36 months
ReleasedNot publishedNot published
Obstacles
Recognised object types200+300+
Depth sensingToF sensor alongside the 360° cameraNot published

Also worth a look

  • Segway Navimow

    Segway Navimow X420

    Segway's large-lawn flagship for 2,000 m²: four-wheel drive with dual suspension for 84% slopes, a 43 cm twin-disc deck with two 180 W motors, network RTK with a 360° camera and 120 zones.

  • Mammotion

    Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 5000

    All-wheel-drive flagship for 80% slopes and 5,000 m², positioned by 360° LiDAR, network RTK and two cameras together, with no reference antenna to site.

  • Dreame

    Dreame A3 AWD Pro 3500

    The A3 AWD Pro for 3,500 m²: two blade discs cutting 40 cm, all-wheel drive for 80% slopes, 70 m LiDAR with two cameras instead of RTK, edges to within 3 cm and a 36 V 7.5 Ah battery.

Other comparisons

Side by side →