Head to head · Robot lawn mowers
Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1000 vs MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000 AWD
Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1000 vs MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000 AWD: Verdict Scores 84 and 84, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
Both score 84/100. The difference is what each is built for.
The Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1000 has the edge in navigation, ease of use and value. The MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000 AWD has the edge in cutting, obstacle avoidance and features.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1000 is ahead on one row: noise (58 dB against 66 dB). In turn, the MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000 AWD is ahead on 4 rows, among them max lawn area (2,000 m² against 1,000 m²), zones (150 against 10) and cutting width (400 mm against 200 mm).
The Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1000 suits sloped or uneven gardens up to 1,000 m². The MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000 AWD suits large sloped gardens with trees, where RTK mowers lose their fix.
Where the Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1000 is ahead
- Navigation97 · 80
- Ease of Use100 · 80
- Value68 · 38
- Noise58 dB · 66 dB
Where the MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000 AWD is ahead
- Cutting96 · 68
- Obstacle Avoidance100 · 79
- Features85 · 60
- Max lawn area2,000 m² (0.49 acres) · 1,000 m² (10,764 sq ft)
- Zones150 · 10
- Cutting width400 mm · 200 mm
- Charging time1 h 5 min · 2 h 30 min
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1000 | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
84/100 ≈ $1,530Price in the manufacturer's shop | 84/100 ≈ $2,390Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Check price | Check price on Amazon.com | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 84/100 | 84/100 |
| Navigation | 97 | 80 |
| Cutting | 68 | 96 |
| Terrain | 100 | 100 |
| Obstacle Avoidance | 79 | 100 |
| Ease of Use | 100 | 80 |
| Reliability | 78 | 78 |
| Features | 60 | 85 |
| Value | 68 | 38 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Coverage | ||
| Max lawn area | 1,000 m² (10,764 sq ft) | 2,000 m² (0.49 acres) |
| Zones | 10 | 150 |
| Area per charge | Not published | 800 m² |
| Navigation | ||
| Navigation | RTK-GNSS + vision | Vision + LiDAR |
| Boundary wire | Not required | Not required |
| Obstacle avoidance | AI camera | Camera + LiDAR fusion |
| LiDAR range | Not published | 70 m at 80% reflectivity, 360°; two 1080p RGB cameras |
| Maps | Not published | Two |
| Cutting | ||
| Cutting width | 200 mm | 400 mm |
| Cutting height | 20–65 mm | 30–100 mm |
| Edge cutting | Yes | Yes |
| Edge-cutting disc | 120 mm, fixed at 50 mm | Not published |
| Edge distance in edge mode | 5.5 cm | Not published |
| Cutting motor power | 88 W | Not published |
| Blade discs | Not published | Two floating discs with six blades each, 40 cm together |
| Edge distance | Not published | Under 3 cm, UltraTrim 2.0 |
| Night mowing | Not published | Yes |
| Terrain | ||
| Max slope | 80% (39°) | 80% (39°) |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD |
| Obstacle height | Not published | 6 cm |
| Suspension | Not published | Independent per wheel, omni wheels |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | 243 Wh |
| Runtime | 2 h 30 min | 2 h 30 min |
| Charging time | 2 h 30 min | 1 h 5 min |
| Area per charge | 430 m² | Not published |
| Charging current | Not published | 5 A |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| 4G / LTE | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | No | Yes |
| 4G service | Not published | Three years included |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 15 kg | 23.6 kg |
| L × W × H | 584 × 430 × 282 mm | 740 × 532 × 321 mm |
| Noise | 58 dB | 66 dB |
| Weather sealing | IPX6 | IPX6 |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | 36 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Obstacles | ||
| Smallest detected obstacle | 2.5 × 2.5 cm | Not published |
| Recognised obstacle types | Not published | 300+, down to 2 × 2 cm |
| Safety | ||
| TrueGuard | Not published | Location tracking, geofence alarm, AirTag, patrol, live audio, person detection |
Also worth a look
- Segway Navimow89
X420
Segway's large-lawn flagship for 2,000 m²: four-wheel drive with dual suspension for 84% slopes, a 43 cm twin-disc deck with two 180 W motors, network RTK with a 360° camera and 120 zones.
- Segway Navimow88
X450
The 5,000 m² Navimow X4: four-wheel drive with dual suspension for 84% slopes, a 43 cm deck with two 180 W motors, a 15 Ah battery for 1,300 m² a charge and two years of cellular data.
- MOVA86
LiDAX Ultra 1000 AWD
MOVA's all-wheel-drive LiDAR mower for 1,000 m²: a 40 cm cut from two floating discs, 80% slopes, 6 cm obstacles, 70 m LiDAR with two cameras, edges under 3 cm and 800 m² per charge.
Other comparisons
- MOVA LiDAX Ultra 1000 AWD vs Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1000
- Segway Navimow i210 LiDAR Pro vs Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1000
- Segway Navimow X420 vs Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1000
- Segway Navimow X450 vs Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1000
- MOVA LiDAX Ultra 1600 AWD vs Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1000
- Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000 vs Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1000
- Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 5000 vs Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1000
- Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1000 vs Dreame A3 AWD Pro 3500
- Mammotion LUBA mini 2 AWD 1000 vs Dreame A3 AWD Pro 5000
- Segway Navimow X420 vs MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000 AWD
- Segway Navimow X450 vs MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000 AWD
- MOVA LiDAX Ultra 1000 AWD vs MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000 AWD
- MOVA LiDAX Ultra 1600 AWD vs MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000 AWD
- Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 3000 vs MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000 AWD
- Mammotion LUBA 3 AWD 5000 vs MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000 AWD
- MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000 AWD vs Dreame A3 AWD Pro 3500
- MOVA LiDAX Ultra 2000 AWD vs Dreame A3 AWD Pro 5000

