Head to head · Robot vacuums
Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
Dreame Matrix10 Ultra or X60 Max Ultra Complete? The X60 Max Ultra Complete: suction 35,000 vs 30,000 Pa, height 79.5 vs 89 mm. Verdict Scores 83 and 85.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete has the higher Verdict Score, 85 to 83.
The Dreame Matrix10 Ultra has the edge in obstacle avoidance. The Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete has the edge in cleaning, navigation and reliability.
No published figure puts the Dreame Matrix10 Ultra ahead. In the manufacturers' published figures the Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete is ahead on 2 rows: suction (35,000 Pa against 30,000 Pa) and threshold climb (45 mm against 42 mm).
At $1,400 against $1,500, the Dreame Matrix10 Ultra is the cheaper of the two. The Dreame Matrix10 Ultra suits homes mixing wood, tile and rugs that each want a different pad. The Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete suits large American homes with thresholds, rugs and pets.
This comparison is computed from our specification database and is not edited individually. Method: specification analysis of the makers' published figures, explained on our scoring and editorial policy pages.
Where the Dreame Matrix10 Ultra is ahead
- Obstacle Avoidance95 · 90
Where the Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete is ahead
- Cleaning93 · 83
- Navigation96 · 94
- Reliability73 · 64
- Suction35,000 Pa · 30,000 Pa
- Threshold climb45 mm · 42 mm
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Where to buy
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

Dreame press image

Dreame press image
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Dreame Dreame Matrix10 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
83/100 $1,400Price in the manufacturer's shop | 85/100 $1,500Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 83/100 | 85/100 |
| Cleaning | 83 | 93 |
| Navigation | 94 | 96 |
| Mopping | 92 | 92 |
| Obstacle Avoidance | 95 | 90 |
| Automation | 90 | 90 |
| Ease of Use | 94 | 94 |
| Reliability | 64 | 73 |
| Value | 25 | 25 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Suction | 30,000 Pa | 35,000 Pa |
| Brush system | Tangle-resistant | Tangle-resistant |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet boost | No | Yes |
| Dustbin | Not published | Not published |
| Hair length handled without tangling | Up to 50 cm, TÜV SÜD certified | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Retracting LiDAR | Retracting LiDAR |
| Obstacle avoidance | Camera + depth sensor | Twin-camera AI |
| Saved floor plans | Not published | Not published |
| Threshold climb | 42 mm | 45 mm |
| Height with the turret raised | 111 mm | Not published |
| Turret raised | Not published | 103 mm |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Twin spinning pads | Twin spinning pads |
| Mop lift | Detaches for carpet | Detaches for carpet |
| Extending mop | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | Not published | Not published |
| Mop reach | Pad extends up to 45 mm | Not published |
| Mop pressure and speed | Not published | 15 N, 230 rpm, pads tilt ±5° |
| Hot-water mopping | Not published | 40 °C water on thermal pads |
| Mop extension | Not published | 40 mm |
| Dock | ||
| Self-emptying | Yes | Yes |
| Mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Mop wash temperature | 100 °C | Not published |
| Mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Plumbed drain | No | No |
| Dust bag interval | 100 days | 100 days |
| Pad magazine | The dock swaps between pad types by floor, with a three-solution detergent module | Not published |
| Drying | DashDry hot air: mops first, then the bag and the bin | Not published |
| Dock size and weight | 416 × 457 × 590 mm, 16.6 kg | Not published |
| Detergent | Not published | Two compartments, cleaning and deodorising solutions |
| Software | ||
| No-go zones | Yes | Yes |
| Pet recognition | No | Yes |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | 6,400 mAh |
| Runtime | Not published | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | 1 h 20 min |
| Charge limit | Not published | Cut-off adjustable between 80 and 100% |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Voice control | Yes | Yes |
| Matter | Not published | Supported |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 4.7 kg | 4.7 kg |
| L × W × H | 351 × 350 × 89 mm | 350 × 350 × 80 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | Not published | 36 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Chassis | ||
| Double-step threshold | 8 cm | Not published |
| Obstacles | ||
| Recognised object types | 240+ | 280+, down to 10 mm, with reinforcement-learning avoidance |
| Double-layer threshold | Not published | 88 mm |
| Fit | ||
| Dock size and weight | Not published | 390 × 423 × 499 mm, 10.6 kg |
Also worth a look
- Dreame89
Dreame X50 Master
The X50 Ultra robot on a plumbed 249 mm dock: 20,000 Pa, legs for a 4.2 cm sill, a LiDAR that retracts to 89 mm, an 80 °C wash, 220 minutes a charge and a 3-year warranty.
- Roborock84
Roborock Saros Z70
The robot vacuum with an arm: 22,000 Pa, solid-state 3D sensing in an 80 mm body, and a five-axis gripper that lifts socks, slippers and tissues out of its own path.
- Dreame85
Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
The L60 with legs: 35,000 Pa, ProLeap legs for 8.8 cm double-layer thresholds, a LiDAR that retracts to 89 mm, 280 object types, mops with 40 °C water, and a 6,400 mAh battery for 220 minutes.
Other comparisons
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- MOVA V50 Ultra Complete vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Narwal Freo Z10 Ultra vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame L50 Pro Ultra vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Ultra
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X50 Ultra
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Dreame Matrix10 Pro vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X50 Master
- Dreame L50 Ultra vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Dreame Aqua20 Pro Ultra Roller X Complete vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- MOVA V50 Ultra Complete vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Narwal Freo Z10 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Dreame X50 Ultra
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Dreame L50 Pro Ultra
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Roborock Saros Z70
- Dreame X50 Master vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame L50 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame Aqua20 Pro Ultra Roller X Complete vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete