Head to head · Robot vacuums
Dreame Matrix10 Pro vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
Dreame Matrix10 Pro or Matrix10 Ultra? The Matrix10 Ultra: threshold climb 42 vs 22 mm, height 89 vs 104 mm. Verdict Scores 78 and 84.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The Dreame Matrix10 Ultra has the higher Verdict Score, 84 to 78.
The Dreame Matrix10 Pro has the edge in value. The Dreame Matrix10 Ultra has the edge in navigation and mopping.
No published figure puts the Dreame Matrix10 Pro ahead. In the manufacturers' published figures the Dreame Matrix10 Ultra is ahead on one row: threshold climb (42 mm against 22 mm).
At $1,500 against $1,400, the Dreame Matrix10 Ultra is the cheaper of the two. The Dreame Matrix10 Pro suits hard-floor homes with rugs that want different pads. The Dreame Matrix10 Ultra suits homes mixing wood, tile and rugs that each want a different pad.
Where the Dreame Matrix10 Pro is ahead
- Value41 · 37
Where the Dreame Matrix10 Ultra is ahead
- Navigation94 · 69
- Mopping92 · 85
- Threshold climb42 mm · 22 mm
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Dreame Matrix10 Pro | Dreame Matrix10 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
78/100 $1,500Price in the manufacturer's shop | 84/100 $1,400Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 78/100 | 84/100 |
| Cleaning | 83 | 83 |
| Navigation | 69 | 94 |
| Mopping | 85 | 92 |
| Obstacle Avoidance | 95 | 95 |
| Automation | 90 | 90 |
| Ease of Use | 94 | 94 |
| Reliability | 64 | 64 |
| Value | 41 | 37 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Suction | 30,000 Pa | 30,000 Pa |
| Brush system | Tangle-resistant | Tangle-resistant |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet boost | No | No |
| Dustbin | Not published | Not published |
| Hair length handled without tangling | Not published | Up to 50 cm, TÜV SÜD certified |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | LiDAR | Retracting LiDAR |
| Obstacle avoidance | Camera + depth sensor | Camera + depth sensor |
| Saved floor plans | Not published | Not published |
| Threshold climb | 22 mm | 42 mm |
| Height with the turret raised | Not published | 111 mm |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Twin spinning pads | Twin spinning pads |
| Mop lift | Detaches for carpet | Detaches for carpet |
| Extending mop | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | 80 ml | Not published |
| Mop reach | Rotating pad swings 4 cm into corners | Pad extends up to 45 mm |
| Dock | ||
| Self-emptying | Yes | Yes |
| Mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Mop wash temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Plumbed drain | No | No |
| Dust bag interval | 100 days | 100 days |
| Pad magazine | The dock swaps between pad types by floor, with a three-compartment detergent module | The dock swaps between pad types by floor, with a three-solution detergent module |
| Warm-air drying | 45 °C | Not published |
| Dock size and weight | 416 × 457 × 590 mm, 16.1 kg | 416 × 457 × 590 mm, 16.6 kg |
| Drying | Not published | DashDry hot air: mops first, then the bag and the bin |
| Software | ||
| No-go zones | Yes | Yes |
| Pet waste recognition | No | No |
| Power | ||
| Battery | 6,400 mAh | Not published |
| Runtime | Not published | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Voice control | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 4.1 kg | 4.7 kg |
| L × W × H | 350 × 350 × 104 mm | 351 × 350 × 89 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | Not published | Not published |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Chassis | ||
| Double-step threshold | 40 mm | 8 cm |
| Obstacles | ||
| Recognised object types | 280 | 240+ |
Also worth a look
- Dreame87
Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete
Dreame's roller-mop flagship: 30,000 Pa, a 270 mm roller at 9 to 11 N that slides to the wall and lifts 14 mm, legs for a 4.2 cm sill or 8 cm double step, two AI cameras and a 100 °C wash.
- Dreame87
X50 Master
The X50 Ultra robot on a plumbed 249 mm dock: 20,000 Pa, legs for a 4.2 cm sill, a LiDAR that retracts to 89 mm, an 80 °C wash, 220 minutes a charge and a 3-year warranty.
- Roborock86
Saros 20
Roborock's flagship: 36,000 Pa, twin spinning mops the dock washes at 100 °C, and a solid-state 3D sensor instead of a LiDAR turret.
Other comparisons
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- MOVA V50 Ultra Complete vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Narwal Freo Z10 Ultra vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame L50 Pro Ultra vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Ultra
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X50 Ultra
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X50 Master
- Dreame L50 Ultra vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Dreame Aqua20 Pro Ultra Roller X Complete vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra

