Head to head · Robot vacuums

Dreame L50 Pro Ultra vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra

Dreame L50 Pro Ultra or Matrix10 Ultra? The Matrix10 Ultra: threshold climb 42 vs 22 mm, suction 30,000 vs 19,500 Pa. Verdict Scores 81 and 83.

Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated

Verdict

The Dreame Matrix10 Ultra has the higher Verdict Score, 83 to 81.

The Dreame L50 Pro Ultra has the edge in obstacle avoidance. The Dreame Matrix10 Ultra has the edge in cleaning and navigation.

No published figure puts the Dreame L50 Pro Ultra ahead. In the manufacturers' published figures the Dreame Matrix10 Ultra is ahead on 3 rows: suction (30,000 Pa against 19,500 Pa), threshold climb (42 mm against 22 mm) and mop wash temperature (100 °C against 75 °C).

The Dreame L50 Pro Ultra suits flats with low sofas and beds where 89.5 mm decides coverage. The Dreame Matrix10 Ultra suits homes mixing wood, tile and rugs that each want a different pad.

This comparison is computed from our specification database and is not edited individually. Method: specification analysis of the makers' published figures, explained on our scoring and editorial policy pages.

Dreame
Dreame L50 Pro Ultra≈ $740

Where the Dreame L50 Pro Ultra is ahead

  • Obstacle Avoidance100 · 95

Where the Dreame Matrix10 Ultra is ahead

  • Cleaning83 · 82
  • Navigation94 · 84
  • Suction30,000 Pa · 19,500 Pa
  • Threshold climb42 mm · 22 mm
  • Mop wash temperature100 °C · 75 °C

Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.

Where to buy

Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

Full specification, side by side

Compare
Dreame L50 Pro Ultra
Dreame press image
Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
Dreame press image
≈ $740Price in the manufacturer's shop
$1,400Price in the manufacturer's shop
Highest Verdict Score

Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

Search on Amazon.comCheck price on Amazon.com
At a glance
Leads on
  • Obstacle Avoidance
  • Cleaning
  • Navigation
Pros
  • Retracting turret: 89.5 mm under furniture
  • Camera plus 3D structured light, people and pets recognised
  • Pads lift, extend and detach; 75 °C wash and 100 days of dust
  • Dock swaps pad types by floor and doses three detergents
  • Legs for 4.2 cm sills and 8 cm double steps, 89 mm with the turret down
  • 30,000 Pa and a DuoBrush certified for 50 cm hair
Cons
  • 22 mm single-step threshold; the 40 mm figure needs two steps
  • 19,500 Pa, well under the flagships
  • Plumbing kit costs extra
  • No battery, runtime, bin, tank or noise figure published
  • Station weighs 16.6 kg and stands 590 mm tall
  • The American listing is a group-buy
Best for
  • Flats with low sofas and beds where 89.5 mm decides coverage
  • Homes with a pet and cables, on a mid-range budget
  • Homes mixing wood, tile and rugs that each want a different pad
  • Buyers who want the most automated dock Dreame makes
Score breakdown
Verdict Score81/10083/100
Cleaning
82
83
Navigation
84
94
Mopping
92
92
Obstacle Avoidance
100
95
Automation
90
90
Ease of Use
94
94
Reliability
64
64
Value
25
25
Specifications

In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked.

Cleaning
Suction19,500 Pa30,000 Pa
Brush systemTangle-resistantTangle-resistant
Side brushes11
Carpet boostNoNo
Dustbin395 mlNot published
Hair length handled without tanglingNot publishedUp to 50 cm, TÜV SÜD certified
Navigation
MappingRetracting LiDARRetracting LiDAR
Obstacle avoidanceCamera + depth sensorCamera + depth sensor
Saved floor plansNot publishedNot published
Threshold climb22 mm42 mm
Two-step threshold40 mm over two steps with a gap of more than 3 cm (EasyLeap)Not published
Height with the sensor raised111.5 mmNot published
Height with the turret raisedNot published111 mm
Mopping
Mop typeTwin spinning padsTwin spinning pads
Mop liftDetaches for carpetDetaches for carpet
Extending mopYesYes
Water tankNot publishedNot published
Area per charge214 m²Not published
Mop reachNot publishedPad extends up to 45 mm
Dock
Self-emptyingYesYes
Mop washingYesYes
Mop wash temperature75 °C100 °C
Mop dryingYesYes
Water refillYesYes
Plumbed drainNoNo
Dust bag interval100 days100 days
Wash temperature settings75 °C, four adjustable levelsNot published
Water tanks (clean / dirty)4.5 l / 4.0 lNot published
Plumbing kitOptional, for automatic refill and drainNot published
Dock size and weight457 × 340 × 590 mm, 9 kg416 × 457 × 590 mm, 16.6 kg
Pad magazineNot publishedThe dock swaps between pad types by floor, with a three-solution detergent module
DryingNot publishedDashDry hot air: mops first, then the bag and the bin
Software
No-go zonesYesYes
Pet recognitionYesNo
MatterYesNot published
Power
Battery6,400 mAhNot published
Runtime3 h 50 minNot published
Charging timeNot publishedNot published
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothNoNo
4G / LTENoNo
Voice controlYesYes
Physical
Weight4.13 kg4.7 kg
L × W × H352 × 350 × 90 mm351 × 350 × 89 mm
NoiseNot publishedNot published
Support
WarrantyNot publishedNot published
ReleasedNot publishedNot published
Chassis
Double-step thresholdNot published8 cm
Obstacles
Recognised object typesNot published240+

Also worth a look

  • Dreame

    Dreame X50 Master

    The X50 Ultra robot on a plumbed 249 mm dock: 20,000 Pa, legs for a 4.2 cm sill, a LiDAR that retracts to 89 mm, an 80 °C wash, 220 minutes a charge and a 3-year warranty.

  • Roborock

    Roborock Saros Z70

    The robot vacuum with an arm: 22,000 Pa, solid-state 3D sensing in an 80 mm body, and a five-axis gripper that lifts socks, slippers and tissues out of its own path.

  • Ecovacs

    Ecovacs DEEBOT X12 OmniCyclone

    Ecovacs' bagless roller flagship: 22,000 Pa and 22 l/s, a 27 cm roller that extends 2.58 cm and lifts 15 mm, FocusJet stain spraying, voice control and a 1.6 l cyclone bin for 48 days.

Other comparisons

Side by side →