Head to head · Robot vacuums
Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
Dreame L60 Pro Ultra or Matrix10 Ultra? The L60 Pro Ultra: suction 35,000 vs 30,000 Pa. Verdict Scores 85 and 83. The Matrix10 Ultra leads on navigation.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The Dreame L60 Pro Ultra has the higher Verdict Score, 85 to 83.
The Dreame L60 Pro Ultra has the edge in cleaning, value and reliability. The Dreame Matrix10 Ultra has the edge in navigation.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Dreame L60 Pro Ultra is ahead on one row: suction (35,000 Pa against 30,000 Pa). No published figure puts the Dreame Matrix10 Ultra ahead.
At $1,100 against $1,400, the Dreame L60 Pro Ultra is the cheaper of the two. The Dreame L60 Pro Ultra suits homes with high door thresholds and low furniture. The Dreame Matrix10 Ultra suits homes mixing wood, tile and rugs that each want a different pad.
This comparison is computed from our specification database and is not edited individually. Method: specification analysis of the makers' published figures, explained on our scoring and editorial policy pages.
Where the Dreame L60 Pro Ultra is ahead
- Cleaning93 · 83
- Reliability73 · 64
- Value29 · 25
- Suction35,000 Pa · 30,000 Pa
Where the Dreame Matrix10 Ultra is ahead
- Navigation94 · 89
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Where to buy
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

Dreame press image

Dreame press image
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Dreame Dreame L60 Pro Ultra | Dreame Dreame Matrix10 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
85/100 $1,100Price in the manufacturer's shop | 83/100 $1,400Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 85/100 | 83/100 |
| Cleaning | 93 | 83 |
| Navigation | 89 | 94 |
| Mopping | 92 | 92 |
| Obstacle Avoidance | 95 | 95 |
| Automation | 90 | 90 |
| Ease of Use | 94 | 94 |
| Reliability | 73 | 64 |
| Value | 29 | 25 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Suction | 35,000 Pa | 30,000 Pa |
| Brush system | Tangle-resistant | Tangle-resistant |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet boost | Yes | No |
| Dustbin | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime, as tested | 220 minutes vacuuming and mopping in the quiet setting; 205 m² vacuuming | Not published |
| Hair length handled without tangling | Not published | Up to 50 cm, TÜV SÜD certified |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Retracting LiDAR | Retracting LiDAR |
| Obstacle avoidance | Camera + depth sensor | Camera + depth sensor |
| Saved floor plans | Not published | Not published |
| Threshold climb | Not published | 42 mm |
| Turret raised | 111 mm | Not published |
| Height with the turret raised | Not published | 111 mm |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Twin spinning pads | Twin spinning pads |
| Mop lift | Detaches for carpet | Detaches for carpet |
| Extending mop | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | Not published | Not published |
| Hot-water mopping | 40 °C water on thermal pads | Not published |
| Mop reach | Not published | Pad extends up to 45 mm |
| Dock | ||
| Self-emptying | Yes | Yes |
| Mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Mop wash temperature | Not published | 100 °C |
| Mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Plumbed drain | No | No |
| Dust bag interval | 100 days | 100 days |
| Dust bag | 3.2 l | Not published |
| Pad magazine | Not published | The dock swaps between pad types by floor, with a three-solution detergent module |
| Drying | Not published | DashDry hot air: mops first, then the bag and the bin |
| Dock size and weight | Not published | 416 × 457 × 590 mm, 16.6 kg |
| Software | ||
| No-go zones | Yes | Yes |
| Pet recognition | No | No |
| Power | ||
| Battery | 6,400 mAh | Not published |
| Runtime | 3 h 40 min | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Voice control | Yes | Yes |
| Matter | By a coming update | Not published |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 4.5 kg | 4.7 kg |
| L × W × H | 350 × 350 × 89 mm | 351 × 350 × 89 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | Not published |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Obstacles | ||
| Double-layer threshold | 88 mm with the ProLeap legs; no single-step figure is published | Not published |
| Recognised object types | 280+ | 240+ |
| Fit | ||
| Dock size and weight | 340 × 456 × 590 mm, 9.3 kg | Not published |
| Chassis | ||
| Double-step threshold | Not published | 8 cm |
Also worth a look
- Dreame89
Dreame X50 Master
The X50 Ultra robot on a plumbed 249 mm dock: 20,000 Pa, legs for a 4.2 cm sill, a LiDAR that retracts to 89 mm, an 80 °C wash, 220 minutes a charge and a 3-year warranty.
- Dreame84
Dreame X50 Ultra
The 2025 flagship that introduced Dreame's legs: 20,000 Pa, a 4.2 cm sill or 6 cm double step, 89 mm with the turret down, pads that extend and detach, an 80 °C wash and 220 minutes per charge.
- Roborock84
Roborock Saros Z70
The robot vacuum with an arm: 22,000 Pa, solid-state 3D sensing in an 80 mm body, and a five-axis gripper that lifts socks, slippers and tissues out of its own path.
Other comparisons
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- MOVA V50 Ultra Complete vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Narwal Freo Z10 Ultra vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame L50 Pro Ultra
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X50 Ultra
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Roborock Saros Z70
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X50 Master
- Dreame L50 Ultra vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Dreame Aqua20 Pro Ultra Roller X Complete vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Ultra
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Roborock Qrevo Edge 2 Flow
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Roborock Qrevo Edge 2
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- MOVA V50 Ultra Complete vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Narwal Freo Z10 Ultra vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame L50 Pro Ultra vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Ultra
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X50 Ultra
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Dreame Matrix10 Pro vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X50 Master
- Dreame L50 Ultra vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
- Dreame Aqua20 Pro Ultra Roller X Complete vs Dreame Matrix10 Ultra