Head to head · Robot vacuums
Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone: Verdict Scores 85 and 85, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
Both score 85/100. The difference is what each is built for.
The Dreame L60 Pro Ultra has the edge in cleaning and navigation. The MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone has the edge in mopping and value.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Dreame L60 Pro Ultra is ahead on one row: suction (35,000 Pa against 26,000 Pa). No published figure puts the MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone ahead.
The Dreame L60 Pro Ultra suits homes with high door thresholds and low furniture. The MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone suits kitchens and hallways where a wide dock will not fit.
Where the Dreame L60 Pro Ultra is ahead
- Cleaning93 · 77
- Navigation90 · 88
- Suction35,000 Pa · 26,000 Pa
Where the MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone is ahead
- Mopping95 · 92
- Value70 · 33
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Dreame L60 Pro Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
85/100 $1,400Price in the manufacturer's shop | 85/100 ≈ $650Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Check price on Amazon.de | Check price on Amazon.de | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 85/100 | 85/100 |
| Cleaning | 93 | 77 |
| Navigation | 90 | 88 |
| Mopping | 92 | 95 |
| Obstacle Avoidance | 95 | 95 |
| Automation | 90 | 90 |
| Ease of Use | 95 | 95 |
| Reliability | 73 | 73 |
| Value | 33 | 70 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Suction | 35,000 Pa | 26,000 Pa |
| Brush system | Tangle-resistant | Tangle-resistant |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet boost | Yes | No |
| Dustbin | Not published | 210 ml |
| Runtime, as tested | 220 minutes vacuuming and mopping in the quiet setting; 205 m² vacuuming | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Retracting LiDAR | Retracting LiDAR |
| Obstacle avoidance | Camera + depth sensor | Camera + depth sensor |
| Saved floor plans | Not published | Not published |
| Threshold climb | Not published | Not published |
| Turret raised | 111 mm | Not published |
| Height with the sensor raised | Not published | 119.6 mm |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Twin spinning pads | Washed roller |
| Mop lift | Detaches for carpet | 14 mm |
| Extending mop | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | Not published | Not published |
| Hot-water mopping | 40 °C water on thermal pads | Not published |
| Mop roller | Not published | 25.6 cm roller at 4,100 Pa, extends 4.3 cm, 12 nozzles |
| Dock | ||
| Self-emptying | Yes | Yes |
| Mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Plumbed drain | No | No |
| Dust bag interval | 100 days | 100 days |
| Dust bag | 3.2 l | 3.2 l |
| Dock size | Not published | 420 × 278 × 470 mm, 278 mm wide |
| Water tanks | Not published | 4 l clean, 3.5 l dirty |
| Detergent dispensing | Not published | 600 ml module |
| Software | ||
| No-go zones | Yes | Yes |
| Pet waste recognition | No | No |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | 3 h 40 min | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Voice control | Yes | Yes |
| Matter | By a coming update | Not published |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 4.5 kg | Not published |
| L × W × H | 350 × 350 × 89 mm | 350 × 350 × 96 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | 36 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Obstacles | ||
| Double-layer threshold | 88 mm with the ProLeap legs; no single-step figure is published | Not published |
| Recognised object types | 280+ | Not published |
| Recognised obstacle types | Not published | 200+ |
| Fit | ||
| Dock size and weight | 340 × 456 × 590 mm, 9.3 kg | Not published |
Also worth a look
- Dreame87
Aqua10 Roller
Roller mop and legs without the retracting turret: 30,000 Pa with a carpet boost, a roller at 9 to 11 N that lifts 14 mm under a guard, a 4.2 cm sill or 6 cm double step, 120 mm tall, a 100 °C wash.
- MOVA86
Z60 Ultra Roller Complete
MOVA's roller mop with legs: 28,000 Pa, a roller at 4,100 Pa that extends to the wall and lifts 14 mm, 4.8 cm sills or 8 cm double steps, and a dock that washes at 80 °C, dries, refills and doses detergent.
- Roborock86
Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
A Saros-shaped Qrevo: 25,000 Pa, a fully retractable LiDAR in an 80 mm body, 12 N spinning mops left in the dock for carpet, a chassis that lifts 20 mm and takes 4 cm double steps, and a 100 °C wash.
Other comparisons
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Roborock Saros 20
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone vs Roborock Saros 20
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete

