Head to head · Robot vacuums
Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete: Verdict Scores 85 and 85, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
Both score 85/100. The difference is what each is built for.
The Dreame L60 Pro Ultra has the edge in obstacle avoidance and value. The Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete has the edge in navigation.
No published figure puts the Dreame L60 Pro Ultra ahead. No published figure puts the Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete ahead.
At $1,400 against $1,700, the Dreame L60 Pro Ultra is the cheaper of the two. The Dreame L60 Pro Ultra suits homes with high door thresholds and low furniture. The Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete suits large American homes with thresholds, rugs and pets.
Where the Dreame L60 Pro Ultra is ahead
- Obstacle Avoidance95 · 90
- Value33 · 28
Where the Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete is ahead
- Navigation96 · 90
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Dreame L60 Pro Ultra | Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
85/100 $1,400Price in the manufacturer's shop | 85/100 $1,700Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Check price on Amazon.de | Check price on Amazon.de | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 85/100 | 85/100 |
| Cleaning | 93 | 93 |
| Navigation | 90 | 96 |
| Mopping | 92 | 92 |
| Obstacle Avoidance | 95 | 90 |
| Automation | 90 | 90 |
| Ease of Use | 95 | 95 |
| Reliability | 73 | 73 |
| Value | 33 | 28 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Suction | 35,000 Pa | 35,000 Pa |
| Brush system | Tangle-resistant | Tangle-resistant |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet boost | Yes | Yes |
| Dustbin | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime, as tested | 220 minutes vacuuming and mopping in the quiet setting; 205 m² vacuuming | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Retracting LiDAR | Retracting LiDAR |
| Obstacle avoidance | Camera + depth sensor | Twin-camera AI |
| Saved floor plans | Not published | Not published |
| Threshold climb | Not published | 45 mm |
| Turret raised | 111 mm | 103 mm |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Twin spinning pads | Twin spinning pads |
| Mop lift | Detaches for carpet | Detaches for carpet |
| Extending mop | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | Not published | Not published |
| Hot-water mopping | 40 °C water on thermal pads | 40 °C water on thermal pads |
| Mop pressure and speed | Not published | 15 N, 230 rpm, pads tilt ±5° |
| Mop extension | Not published | 40 mm |
| Dock | ||
| Self-emptying | Yes | Yes |
| Mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Plumbed drain | No | No |
| Dust bag interval | 100 days | 100 days |
| Dust bag | 3.2 l | Not published |
| Detergent | Not published | Two compartments, cleaning and deodorising solutions |
| Software | ||
| No-go zones | Yes | Yes |
| Pet waste recognition | No | Yes |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | 3 h 40 min | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | 1 h 20 min |
| Charge limit | Not published | Cut-off adjustable between 80 and 100% |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Voice control | Yes | Yes |
| Matter | By a coming update | Supported |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 4.5 kg | 4.7 kg |
| L × W × H | 350 × 350 × 89 mm | 350 × 350 × 80 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | 36 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Obstacles | ||
| Double-layer threshold | 88 mm with the ProLeap legs; no single-step figure is published | 88 mm |
| Recognised object types | 280+ | 280+, down to 10 mm, with reinforcement-learning avoidance |
| Fit | ||
| Dock size and weight | 340 × 456 × 590 mm, 9.3 kg | 390 × 423 × 499 mm, 10.6 kg |
Also worth a look
- Dreame87
Aqua10 Roller
Roller mop and legs without the retracting turret: 30,000 Pa with a carpet boost, a roller at 9 to 11 N that lifts 14 mm under a guard, a 4.2 cm sill or 6 cm double step, 120 mm tall, a 100 °C wash.
- MOVA86
Z60 Ultra Roller Complete
MOVA's roller mop with legs: 28,000 Pa, a roller at 4,100 Pa that extends to the wall and lifts 14 mm, 4.8 cm sills or 8 cm double steps, and a dock that washes at 80 °C, dries, refills and doses detergent.
- Roborock86
Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
A Saros-shaped Qrevo: 25,000 Pa, a fully retractable LiDAR in an 80 mm body, 12 N spinning mops left in the dock for carpet, a chassis that lifts 20 mm and takes 4 cm double steps, and a 100 °C wash.
Other comparisons
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Roborock Saros 20
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete

