Head to head · Robot vacuums
Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete or X60 Pro Ultra Complete? The X60 Pro Ultra Complete: suction 42,000 vs 35,000 Pa. Verdict Scores 85 and 83.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

Dreame press image

Dreame press image
Verdict
The Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete has the higher Verdict Score, 85 to 83.
The Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete has the edge in cleaning, navigation and reliability. The Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete has the edge in obstacle avoidance and value.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete is ahead on one row: charging time (1 h 20 min against 1 h 26 min). In turn, the Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete is ahead on 2 rows: suction (42,000 Pa against 35,000 Pa) and threshold climb (52 mm against 45 mm).
The Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete suits large American homes with thresholds, rugs and pets. The Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete suits large homes with sills, steps and low furniture.
Where the Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete is ahead
- Cleaning93 · 83
- Navigation96 · 94
- Reliability73 · 64
- Charging time1 h 20 min · 1 h 26 min
Where the Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete is ahead
- Obstacle Avoidance95 · 90
- Value32 · 25
- Suction42,000 Pa · 35,000 Pa
- Threshold climb52 mm · 45 mm
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
85/100 $1,700Price in the manufacturer's shop | 83/100 ≈ $1,780Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 85/100 | 83/100 |
| Cleaning | 93 | 83 |
| Navigation | 96 | 94 |
| Mopping | 92 | 92 |
| Obstacle Avoidance | 90 | 95 |
| Automation | 90 | 90 |
| Ease of Use | 94 | 94 |
| Reliability | 73 | 64 |
| Value | 25 | 32 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Suction | 35,000 Pa | 42,000 Pa |
| Brush system | Tangle-resistant | Tangle-resistant |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet boost | Yes | No |
| Dustbin | Not published | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Retracting LiDAR | Retracting LiDAR |
| Obstacle avoidance | Twin-camera AI | Camera + depth sensor |
| Saved floor plans | Not published | Not published |
| Threshold climb | 45 mm | 52 mm |
| Turret raised | 103 mm | Not published |
| Height with the turret raised | Not published | 111 mm |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Twin spinning pads | Twin spinning pads |
| Mop lift | Detaches for carpet | Detaches for carpet |
| Extending mop | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | Not published | Not published |
| Mop pressure and speed | 15 N, 230 rpm, pads tilt ±5° | 15 N, 280 rpm |
| Hot-water mopping | 40 °C water on thermal pads | Not published |
| Mop extension | 40 mm | Not published |
| Mop reach | Not published | Pad extends 18 cm, side brush 12 cm; RoboSwing swings 4 cm into inside corners |
| Pad temperature while mopping | Not published | 30 to 40 °C for a minute after the wash |
| Dock | ||
| Self-emptying | Yes | Yes |
| Mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Mop wash temperature | Not published | 100 °C |
| Mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Plumbed drain | No | No |
| Dust bag interval | 100 days | 100 days |
| Detergent | Two compartments, cleaning and deodorising solutions | Not published |
| Detergent dispensing | Not published | Automatic, one compartment |
| Dock size and weight | Not published | 390 × 456 × 499 mm, 10.8 kg |
| Software | ||
| No-go zones | Yes | Yes |
| Pet waste recognition | Yes | No |
| Power | ||
| Battery | 6,400 mAh | Not published |
| Runtime | Not published | 3 h 52 min |
| Charging time | 1 h 20 min | 1 h 26 min |
| Charge limit | Cut-off adjustable between 80 and 100% | Not published |
| Fast charge | Not published | 5.5 minutes restore 24%; up to 1,000 m² a session with top-ups |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Voice control | Yes | Yes |
| Matter | Supported | Not published |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 4.7 kg | 4.6 kg |
| L × W × H | 350 × 350 × 80 mm | 350 × 350 × 89 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | Not published |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Obstacles | ||
| Double-layer threshold | 88 mm | Not published |
| Recognised object types | 280+, down to 10 mm, with reinforcement-learning avoidance | 320+ |
| Smallest detected obstacle | Not published | 10 mm |
| Fit | ||
| Dock size and weight | 390 × 423 × 499 mm, 10.6 kg | Not published |
| Chassis | ||
| Double-step threshold | Not published | 10 cm |
| Carpet lift | Not published | Chassis and pads rise 21.5 mm; side brush 10.5 mm and main brush 5 mm when mopping only |
Also worth a look
- Dreame87
Dreame X50 Master
The X50 Ultra robot on a plumbed 249 mm dock: 20,000 Pa, legs for a 4.2 cm sill, a LiDAR that retracts to 89 mm, an 80 °C wash, 220 minutes a charge and a 3-year warranty.
- Dreame85
Dreame Matrix10 Ultra
A legged flagship whose dock changes its own mop pads: 30,000 Pa, a 4.2 cm sill or 8 cm double step, pads that extend 45 mm and detach, a 100 °C wash, three detergents and a 16.6 kg station.
- Roborock85
Roborock Saros 20
Roborock's flagship: 36,000 Pa, twin spinning mops the dock washes at 100 °C, and a solid-state 3D sensor instead of a LiDAR turret.
Other comparisons
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- MOVA V50 Ultra Complete vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Narwal Freo Z10 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Dreame X50 Ultra
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Dreame L50 Pro Ultra
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Roborock Saros Z70
- Dreame X50 Master vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame L50 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame Aqua20 Pro Ultra Roller X Complete vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete vs Dreame X60 Ultra
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Dreame Matrix10 Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete