Head to head · Robot vacuums
Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Roborock Saros 20
Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Roborock Saros 20: Verdict Scores 86 and 85, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro has the higher Verdict Score, 86 to 85.
The Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro has the edge in value and reliability. The Roborock Saros 20 has the edge in navigation, automation and ease of use.
No published figure puts the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro ahead. In the manufacturers' published figures the Roborock Saros 20 is ahead on one row: suction (36,000 Pa against 25,000 Pa).
The Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro suits homes with rugs, sills and chair legs that stop lesser robots. The Roborock Saros 20 suits homes with a mix of hard floors and carpet.
Where the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro is ahead
- Reliability73 · 64
- Value54 · 31
Where the Roborock Saros 20 is ahead
- Navigation94 · 93
- Automation89 · 74
- Ease of Use95 · 86
- Suction36,000 Pa · 25,000 Pa
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro | Roborock Saros 20 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
86/100 ≈ $1,180Price in the manufacturer's shop | 85/100 $1,600Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.de | Check price on Amazon.de | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 86/100 | 85/100 |
| Cleaning | 93 | 93 |
| Navigation | 93 | 94 |
| Mopping | 92 | 92 |
| Obstacle Avoidance | 95 | 95 |
| Automation | 74 | 89 |
| Ease of Use | 86 | 95 |
| Reliability | 73 | 64 |
| Value | 54 | 31 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Suction | 25,000 Pa | 36,000 Pa |
| Brush system | Tangle-resistant | Tangle-resistant |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet boost | Yes | Yes |
| Dustbin | Not published | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Retracting LiDAR | Solid-state 3D ToF + camera |
| Obstacle avoidance | Camera + depth sensor | Camera + depth sensor |
| Saved floor plans | 3 | Not published |
| Threshold climb | Not published | 45 mm |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Twin spinning pads | Twin spinning pads |
| Mop lift | Detaches for carpet | Detaches for carpet |
| Extending mop | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | Not published | Not published |
| Mop pressure | 12 N | Not published |
| Dock | ||
| Self-emptying | Yes | Yes |
| Mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Water refill | No | Yes |
| Plumbed drain | No | No |
| Dust bag interval | Not published | Not published |
| Mop washing temperature | 100 °C | 212 °F / 100 °C |
| Warm-air drying | 55 °C | 131 °F / 55 °C |
| Dock size | 450 × 450 × 450 mm | Not published |
| Detergent dispensing | Not published | Automatic |
| Software | ||
| No-go zones | Yes | Yes |
| Pet waste recognition | No | No |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | Not published | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Voice control | No | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | Not published | Not published |
| L × W × H | 350 × 352 × 80 mm | Not published |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | Not published | 12 months |
| Released | Not published | 2025 |
| Chassis | ||
| AdaptiLift chassis | Lifts 20 mm for carpet up to 3 cm; frees itself from U-shaped chair legs | Not published |
| Double-step threshold | 4 cm | Not published |
| Carpet pile cleared | Not published | 1.18 in / 30 mm |
| Obstacles | ||
| Recognised object types | 200+ | 300+ |
| Sensors | Structured light, RGB camera, VertiBeam side laser | Not published |
Also worth a look
- Dreame87
Aqua10 Roller
Roller mop and legs without the retracting turret: 30,000 Pa with a carpet boost, a roller at 9 to 11 N that lifts 14 mm under a guard, a 4.2 cm sill or 6 cm double step, 120 mm tall, a 100 °C wash.
- MOVA86
Z60 Ultra Roller Complete
MOVA's roller mop with legs: 28,000 Pa, a roller at 4,100 Pa that extends to the wall and lifts 14 mm, 4.8 cm sills or 8 cm double steps, and a dock that washes at 80 °C, dries, refills and doses detergent.
- Dreame85
Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete
Dreame's roller-mop flagship: 30,000 Pa, a 270 mm roller at 9 to 11 N that slides to the wall and lifts 14 mm, legs for a 4.2 cm sill or 8 cm double step, two AI cameras and a 100 °C wash.
Other comparisons
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame X50 Ultra
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Roborock Saros 20 Sonic
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Roborock Saros 20
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete vs Roborock Saros 20
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Roborock Saros 20
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Roborock Saros 20
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone vs Roborock Saros 20
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame X60 Pro Master

