Head to head · Robot vacuums
Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame X50 Ultra
Retractable LiDAR on both: the Roborock has 25,000 Pa, carpet boost and three floor maps; the Dreame a 42 mm threshold, 220 minutes and a dock that does more.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Published
Verdict
The Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro has the higher Verdict Score, 85 to 83.
Both retract the LiDAR turret to get under furniture, both recognise obstacles with a camera fused with 3D sensing, and both carry dual spinning mops that extend to the skirting and are left at the dock before carpet. That is the expensive part of each, and it is the same.
The Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro publishes 25,000 Pa against 20,000, a carpet boost mode, three stored floor maps and an 80 mm body against the Dreame's 89 mm. The Dreame X50 Ultra publishes a 42 mm threshold climb, a 10 mm mop lift, a 220-minute runtime, a 395 ml dustbin, a 100-day dust bag and voice control, and its dock scores higher on our automation subscore, 90 to 74, because it does more on its own; Roborock publishes none of those figures for the Curv 2 Pro.
Our engine has the Roborock ahead, 85 to 83, on the strength of the cleaning subscore. Choose it for carpets and low furniture; choose the Dreame for high door thresholds, a hands-off dock and a maker that states its numbers. The Dreame lists a lot lower in some markets, which can settle it on its own.
Where the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro is ahead
- Cleaning93 · 82
- Reliability73 · 67
- Value52 · 25
- Suction25,000 Pa · 20,000 Pa
Where the Dreame X50 Ultra is ahead
- Navigation94 · 93
- Automation90 · 74
- Ease of Use95 · 86
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro | Dreame X50 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
 |  | |
85/100 ≈ $1,180Price in the manufacturer's shop | 83/100 $2,000Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.de | Check price on Amazon.de | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 85/100 | 83/100 |
| Cleaning | 93 | 82 |
| Navigation | 93 | 94 |
| Mopping | 92 | 92 |
| Obstacle Avoidance | 95 | 95 |
| Automation | 74 | 90 |
| Ease of Use | 86 | 95 |
| Reliability | 73 | 67 |
| Value | 52 | 25 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Suction | 25,000 Pa | 20,000 Pa |
| Brush system | Tangle-resistant | Tangle-resistant |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet boost | Yes | No |
| Dustbin | Not published | 395 ml |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Retracting LiDAR | Retracting LiDAR |
| Obstacle avoidance | Camera + depth sensor | Camera + depth sensor |
| Saved floor plans | 3 | Not published |
| Threshold climb | Not published | 42 mm |
| Height with the turret raised | Not published | 111 mm |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Twin spinning pads | Twin spinning pads |
| Mop lift | Detaches for carpet | Detaches for carpet |
| Extending mop | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | Not published | Not published |
| Mop pressure | 12 N | Not published |
| Mop reach | Not published | Pad extends 4 cm; side brush extends |
| Dock | ||
| Self-emptying | Yes | Yes |
| Mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Water refill | No | Yes |
| Plumbed drain | No | No |
| Dust bag interval | Not published | 100 days |
| Mop washing temperature | 100 °C | Up to 80 °C, four settings |
| Warm-air drying | 55 °C | Not published |
| Dock size | 450 × 450 × 450 mm | Not published |
| UV treatment | Not published | Two UV lamps, on the mops and the dust bag opening |
| Dock size and weight | Not published | 457 × 340 × 590 mm, 9.09 kg |
| Software | ||
| No-go zones | Yes | Yes |
| Pet waste recognition | No | No |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | Not published | 3 h 40 min |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Area per charge | Not published | 205 m², quiet vacuuming |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Voice control | No | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | Not published | 4.53 kg |
| L × W × H | 350 × 352 × 80 mm | 350 × 350 × 89 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | Not published | Not published |
| Released | Not published | 2025 |
| Chassis | ||
| AdaptiLift chassis | Lifts 20 mm for carpet up to 3 cm; frees itself from U-shaped chair legs | Not published |
| Double-step threshold | 4 cm | 6 cm |
| Brush lift | Not published | Main brush 5 mm, side brush 10 mm |
| Obstacles | ||
| Recognised object types | 200+ | Not published |
| Sensors | Structured light, RGB camera, VertiBeam side laser | Not published |
| Recognised obstacle types | Not published | 200 |
Also worth a look
- Dreame86
Aqua10 Roller
The roller mop and the climbing legs for €599: 30,000 Pa with a carpet boost, a roller at 9 to 11 N that lifts 14 mm under a sealing guard, a 4.2 cm sill or 6 cm double step, a fixed LiDAR at 120 mm, and a dock washing at 100 °C and drying at 65 °C.
- Roborock86
Saros 20
Roborock's flagship: 36,000 Pa, twin spinning mops the dock washes at 100 °C, and a solid-state 3D sensor instead of a LiDAR turret.
- Dreame85
Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete
Dreame's roller-mop flagship: 30,000 Pa, a 270 mm roller at 9 to 11 N that slides to the wall and lifts 14 mm, legs for a 4.2 cm sill or 8 cm double step, a retracting LiDAR for 97.5 mm, two AI cameras, and a dock washing at 100 °C and drying at 70 °C, for 2,999 zł or $999.99.