Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame X50 Ultra

Both retract the LiDAR turret to get under furniture, both recognise obstacles with a camera fused with 3D sensing, and both carry dual spinning mops that extend to the skirting and are left at the dock before carpet. That is the expensive part of each, and it is the same.

The Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro publishes 25,000 Pa against 20,000, a carpet boost mode, three stored floor maps and a 79.8 mm body against the Dreame's 89 mm. The Dreame X50 Ultra publishes a 42 mm threshold climb, a 10 mm mop lift, a 220-minute runtime, a 395 ml dustbin, a 100-day dust bag and voice control, and its dock scores higher on our automation subscore, because it does more on its own; Roborock publishes none of those figures for the Curv 2 Pro.

Our engine has the Roborock ahead on the strength of the cleaning subscore; the score card beside this verdict has both Verdict Scores. Choose it for carpets and low furniture; choose the Dreame for high door thresholds, a hands-off dock and a maker that states its numbers. The price row below can settle it on its own.