Head to head · Window cleaning robots
Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI
The maker's shops no longer list the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI; we last saw it there on September 10, 2026. Read its review →
Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI or W2 PRO OMNI? The WINBOT W2S OMNI: suction 8,000 vs 5,500 Pa, water tank 80 vs 60 ml. Verdict Scores 75 and 68.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

Ecovacs press image

Ecovacs press image
Verdict
The Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI has the higher Verdict Score, 75 to 68.
The Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI has the edge in cleaning, adhesion and value. The Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI has the edge in ease of use.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI is ahead on 3 rows: water tank (80 ml against 60 ml), glass per fill (50 m² against 40 m²) and suction (8,000 Pa against 5,500 Pa). In turn, the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI is ahead on one row: noise (63 dB against 68 dB).
The Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI suits framed windows where the corners show. The Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI suits balconies, stairwells and rooms without a socket.
Brand guides
Where the Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI is ahead
- Cleaning73 · 59
- Adhesion100 · 68
- Value38 · 25
- Water tank80 ml · 60 ml
- Glass per fill50 m² · 40 m²
- Suction8,000 Pa · 5,500 Pa
Where the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI is ahead
- Ease of Use76 · 62
- Noise63 dB · 68 dB
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Ecovacs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI | Ecovacs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
75/100 ≈ $540Price in the manufacturer's shop | 68/100 ≈ $650Price last seen | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price | Check price | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 75/100 | 68/100 |
| Cleaning | 73 | 59 |
| Adhesion | 100 | 68 |
| Coverage | 73 | 73 |
| Safety | 76 | 76 |
| Navigation | 100 | 100 |
| Ease of Use | 62 | 76 |
| Reliability | 62 | 62 |
| Value | 38 | 25 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Spray system | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | 80 ml | 60 ml |
| Glass per fill | 50 m² | 40 m² |
| Cleaning speed | Not published | Not published |
| Cleaning modes | Not published | 7 |
| Corner cleaning | Yes | No |
| Corner scrubber | TruEdge, lowered at the frame, up to 200 rpm | Not published |
| Edge mode reach | Quad-Edge mode to 1.1 cm | Not published |
| Time per square metre | About 1 min 45 s, fast mode | About 1 min 45 s, fast mode |
| Area on one station charge | About 65 m² fast mode, 26 m² deep mode | About 55 m² fast mode, 22 m² deep mode |
| Spray nozzles | Not published | 6 |
| Adhesion | ||
| Suction | 8,000 Pa | 5,500 Pa |
| Pressure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Suction while moving | 3,000 Pa | 2,800 Pa |
| Fit | ||
| Largest pane | Not published | Not published |
| Smallest pane | 30 × 40 cm | 30 × 40 cm |
| Edge detection | Yes | Yes |
| Other surfaces | No | No |
| Frame detected from | 2 mm | 2 mm |
| Maximum pane tilt | 45° | Not published |
| Obstacle detected from | Not published | 4 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Power-cut backup | 30 min | 30 min |
| Safety rope | Yes | Yes |
| Rope rating | Not published | Not published |
| Fault self-check | No | No |
| Station | 5.2 kg, suction cup over 800 N, auto-winding cable | 5.5 kg, suction cup over 800 N, auto-winding cable |
| Edge sensing response | 0.2 s | Not published |
| Stated protection layers | 12 | 12 |
| Navigation | ||
| Path planning | Yes | Yes |
| Resumes after interruption | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to start | Yes | Yes |
| Steers round obstacles | Yes | Yes |
| Control | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice prompts | Yes | Yes |
| Cable reach | 5.5 m | 5.5 m |
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Voice prompt languages | Not published | 11+ |
| Mains lead to the station | Not published | 1.8 m |
| Power | ||
| Battery | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Runtime | 1 h 50 min | 1 h 50 min |
| Charging time | 3 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.95 kg | 1.6 kg |
| L × W × H | 270 × 270 × 76 mm | 271 × 271 × 77 mm |
| Noise | 68 dB | 63 dB |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 24 months | 24 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
Also worth a look
- MOVA79
MOVA N1
MOVA's light 8,000 Pa window robot: sprays from a 120 ml tank for 32 m², plans a Z or N route, talks you through the job in 15 languages and holds on for 30 minutes after a power cut.
- Dreame72
Dreame C1
Quiet 5,500 Pa window robot with corner brushes, a 14 cm/s planned route that resumes and returns to its start, a 140 kg-rated tether and a battery-station kit sold separately.
- Ecovacs71
Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
A 215 mm window robot for small and narrow panes from 22 × 25 cm: 7,500 Pa, ultrasonic misting from a 60 ml tank for 25 m², three modes, 1.3 kg and 30 minutes of grip after a power cut.
Other comparisons
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI
- Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W3 OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI
- Dreame C1 Station S vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs MOVA T1 Station
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Dreame C1
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300