Head to head · Window cleaning robots
Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI
Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI: Verdict Scores 73 and 72, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI has the higher Verdict Score, 73 to 72.
The Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI has the edge in adhesion and value. The Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI has the edge in cleaning and ease of use.
No published figure puts the Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI ahead. In the manufacturers' published figures the Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI is ahead on 4 rows, among them water tank (120 ml against 80 ml), glass per fill (75 m² against 50 m²) and suction (10,000 Pa against 8,000 Pa).
The Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI suits framed windows where the corners show. The Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI suits large glazed areas and patio doors done on one fill.
Where the Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI is ahead
- Adhesion100 · 70
- Value32 · 26
Where the Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI is ahead
- Cleaning85 · 70
- Ease of Use63 · 62
- Water tank120 ml · 80 ml
- Glass per fill75 m² · 50 m²
- Suction10,000 Pa · 8,000 Pa
- Noise66 dB · 68 dB
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI | Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
73/100 ≈ $580Price in the manufacturer's shop | 72/100 ≈ $650Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price | Check price | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 73/100 | 72/100 |
| Cleaning | 70 | 85 |
| Adhesion | 100 | 70 |
| Coverage | 63 | 63 |
| Safety | 76 | 76 |
| Navigation | 100 | 100 |
| Ease of Use | 62 | 63 |
| Reliability | 62 | 62 |
| Value | 32 | 26 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Spray system | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | 80 ml | 120 ml |
| Glass per fill | 50 m² | 75 m² |
| Cleaning speed | Not published | Not published |
| Cleaning modes | Not published | 8 |
| Corner cleaning | Yes | Yes |
| Corner scrubber | TruEdge, lowered at the frame, up to 200 rpm | Not published |
| Edge mode reach | Quad-Edge mode to 1.1 cm | Not published |
| Time per square metre | About 1 min 45 s, fast mode | About 1 min 30 s, fast mode |
| Area on one station charge | About 65 m² fast mode, 26 m² deep mode | About 72 m² fast mode, 26 m² deep mode |
| Edge cleaning | Not published | TruEdge 2.0, radial edge-locking, flush to the frame |
| Spray | Not published | High-pressure pump, six nozzles, 90% water coverage |
| Path memory | Not published | Yes |
| Adhesion | ||
| Suction | 8,000 Pa | 10,000 Pa |
| Pressure compensation | Yes | No |
| Suction while moving | 3,000 Pa | 3,300 Pa |
| Fit | ||
| Largest pane | Not published | Not published |
| Smallest pane | 30 × 40 cm | 30 × 40 cm |
| Edge detection | Yes | Yes |
| Other surfaces | No | No |
| Frame detected from | 2 mm | Not published |
| Maximum pane tilt | 45° | 45° |
| Obstacle detected from | Not published | 2 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Power-cut backup | 30 min | 30 min |
| Safety rope | Yes | Yes |
| Rope rating | Not published | Not published |
| Fault self-check | No | No |
| Station | 5.2 kg, suction cup over 800 N, auto-winding cable | 5 kg, suction cup over 800 N, auto-winding cable |
| Edge sensing response | 0.2 s | Not published |
| Stated protection layers | 12 | 12 |
| Navigation | ||
| Path planning | Yes | Yes |
| Resumes after interruption | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to start | Yes | Yes |
| Steers round obstacles | Yes | Yes |
| Control | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice prompts | Yes | Yes |
| Cable reach | 5.5 m | 5.5 m |
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Noise reduction | Not published | Four-stage |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | 1 h 50 min | 1 h 50 min |
| Charging time | 3 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.95 kg | 2.1 kg |
| L × W × H | 270 × 270 × 76 mm | 272 × 272 × 76 mm |
| Noise | 68 dB | 66 dB |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 24 months | 24 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
Also worth a look
- MOVA79
N1
MOVA's light 8,000 Pa window robot: sprays from a 120 ml tank for 32 m², plans a Z or N route, talks you through the job in 15 languages and holds on for 30 minutes after a power cut.
- Dreame71
C1
Quiet 5,500 Pa window robot with corner brushes, a 14 cm/s planned route that resumes and returns to its start, a 140 kg-rated tether and a battery-station kit sold separately.
- Ecovacs68
WINBOT MINI
A 215 mm window robot for small and narrow panes from 22 × 25 cm: 7,500 Pa, ultrasonic misting from a 60 ml tank for 25 m², three modes, 1.3 kg and 30 minutes of grip after a power cut.
Other comparisons
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Dreame C1
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Dreame C1
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI

