Head to head · Window cleaning robots
Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI: Verdict Scores 73 and 68, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI has the higher Verdict Score, 73 to 68.
The Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI has the edge in cleaning and adhesion. The Ecovacs WINBOT MINI has the edge in coverage, value and ease of use.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI is ahead on 4 rows, among them water tank (80 ml against 60 ml), glass per fill (50 m² against 25 m²) and suction (8,000 Pa against 7,500 Pa). In turn, the Ecovacs WINBOT MINI is ahead on 2 rows: smallest pane (22 × 25 cm against 30 × 40 cm) and noise (63 dB against 68 dB).
The Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI suits framed windows where the corners show. The Ecovacs WINBOT MINI suits small and narrow panes: windows with glazing bars, bathroom glass, shower screens.
Where the Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI is ahead
- Cleaning70 · 37
- Adhesion100 · 64
- Water tank80 ml · 60 ml
- Glass per fill50 m² · 25 m²
- Suction8,000 Pa · 7,500 Pa
- Cable reach5.5 m · 3.5 m
Where the Ecovacs WINBOT MINI is ahead
- Coverage66 · 63
- Ease of Use70 · 62
- Value92 · 32
- Smallest pane22 × 25 cm · 30 × 40 cm
- Noise63 dB · 68 dB
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI | Ecovacs WINBOT MINI |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
73/100 ≈ $580Price in the manufacturer's shop | 68/100 ≈ $220Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price | Check price | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 73/100 | 68/100 |
| Cleaning | 70 | 37 |
| Adhesion | 100 | 64 |
| Coverage | 63 | 66 |
| Safety | 76 | 76 |
| Navigation | 100 | 100 |
| Ease of Use | 62 | 70 |
| Reliability | 62 | 62 |
| Value | 32 | 92 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Spray system | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | 80 ml | 60 ml |
| Glass per fill | 50 m² | 25 m² |
| Cleaning speed | Not published | Not published |
| Cleaning modes | Not published | 3 |
| Corner cleaning | Yes | No |
| Corner scrubber | TruEdge, lowered at the frame, up to 200 rpm | Not published |
| Edge mode reach | Quad-Edge mode to 1.1 cm | Not published |
| Time per square metre | About 1 min 45 s, fast mode | About 3 minutes, fast mode |
| Area on one station charge | About 65 m² fast mode, 26 m² deep mode | Not published |
| Spray | Not published | Ultrasonic mist, 10 µm droplets, four nozzles |
| Stated area coverage | Not published | Up to 99.5% with the bumpers removed |
| Adhesion | ||
| Suction | 8,000 Pa | 7,500 Pa |
| Pressure compensation | Yes | No |
| Suction while moving | 3,000 Pa | 3,200 Pa |
| Fit | ||
| Largest pane | Not published | Not published |
| Smallest pane | 30 × 40 cm | 22 × 25 cm |
| Edge detection | Yes | Yes |
| Other surfaces | No | No |
| Frame detected from | 2 mm | 3 mm |
| Maximum pane tilt | 45° | Not published |
| Obstacle detected from | Not published | 4 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Power-cut backup | 30 min | 30 min |
| Safety rope | Yes | 3.3 m |
| Rope rating | Not published | Not published |
| Fault self-check | No | No |
| Station | 5.2 kg, suction cup over 800 N, auto-winding cable | Not published |
| Edge sensing response | 0.2 s | Not published |
| Stated protection layers | 12 | 9 |
| Backup battery | Not published | 3,000 mAh |
| Navigation | ||
| Path planning | Yes | Yes |
| Resumes after interruption | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to start | Yes | Yes |
| Steers round obstacles | Yes | Yes |
| Control | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice prompts | Yes | Yes |
| Cable reach | 5.5 m | 3.5 m |
| Cordless | Yes | No |
| Mains lead | Not published | 1.2 m |
| Colours | Not published | Grey or beige |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | 1 h 50 min | Not published |
| Charging time | 3 h | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.95 kg | 1.3 kg |
| L × W × H | 270 × 270 × 76 mm | 215 × 215 × 55 mm |
| Noise | 68 dB | 63 dB |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 24 months | 24 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
Also worth a look
- MOVA79
N1
MOVA's light 8,000 Pa window robot: sprays from a 120 ml tank for 32 m², plans a Z or N route, talks you through the job in 15 languages and holds on for 30 minutes after a power cut.
- Ecovacs72
WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI
The strongest Winbot: 10,000 Pa, TruEdge 2.0 cleaning flush to the frame, a 120 ml tank for 75 m² a fill, four-stage noise reduction to 66 dB and a battery station for 110 minutes off the mains.
- Dreame71
C1
Quiet 5,500 Pa window robot with corner brushes, a 14 cm/s planned route that resumes and returns to its start, a 140 kg-rated tether and a battery-station kit sold separately.
Other comparisons
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Dreame C1
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Dreame C1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Ecovacs WINBOT MINI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT MINI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI

