Head to head · Window cleaning robots
Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 or Ecovacs WINBOT MINI? Verdict Scores 78 and 70, where each leads on published specs and which to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 has the higher Verdict Score, 78 to 70.
The Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 has the edge in cleaning and adhesion. The Ecovacs WINBOT MINI has the edge in value and ease of use.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 is ahead on 2 rows: glass per fill (30 m² against 25 m²) and suction (8,000 Pa against 7,500 Pa). In turn, the Ecovacs WINBOT MINI is ahead on 2 rows: water tank (60 ml against 50 ml) and smallest pane (22 × 25 cm against 25 × 25 cm).
The Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 suits windows with glazing bars, bathroom glass and shower screens. The Ecovacs WINBOT MINI suits small and narrow panes: windows with glazing bars, bathroom glass, shower screens.
Where the Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 is ahead
- Cleaning66 · 38
- Adhesion100 · 64
- Glass per fill30 m² · 25 m²
- Suction8,000 Pa · 7,500 Pa
Where the Ecovacs WINBOT MINI is ahead
- Ease of Use70 · 56
- Value100 · 80
- Water tank60 ml · 50 ml
- Smallest pane22 × 25 cm · 25 × 25 cm
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 | Ecovacs WINBOT MINI |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
78/100 $240Price in the manufacturer's shop | 70/100 ≈ $210Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price | Check price | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 78/100 | 70/100 |
| Cleaning | 66 | 38 |
| Adhesion | 100 | 64 |
| Coverage | 76 | 76 |
| Safety | 76 | 76 |
| Navigation | 100 | 100 |
| Ease of Use | 56 | 70 |
| Reliability | 62 | 62 |
| Value | 80 | 100 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Spray system | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | 50 ml | 60 ml |
| Glass per fill | 30 m² | 25 m² |
| Cleaning speed | Not published | Not published |
| Cleaning modes | 7 | 3 |
| Corner cleaning | Yes | No |
| Spray | Ultrasonic mist, 10 µm droplets, four nozzles | Ultrasonic mist, 10 µm droplets, four nozzles |
| Corner brushes | Felt brushes at all four corners, up to 84 rpm, to 1 mm from the frame | Not published |
| Time per square metre | About 2 min 30 s, fast mode | About 3 minutes, fast mode |
| Stated area coverage | Up to 90% | Up to 99.5% with the bumpers removed |
| Pad pressure on the glass | 14 N | Not published |
| Adhesion | ||
| Suction | 8,000 Pa | 7,500 Pa |
| Pressure compensation | Yes | No |
| Suction while moving | 3,400 Pa | 3,200 Pa |
| Pressure compensation response | 0.04 s | Not published |
| Fit | ||
| Largest pane | Not published | Not published |
| Smallest pane | 25 × 25 cm | 22 × 25 cm |
| Edge detection | Yes | Yes |
| Other surfaces | No | No |
| Frame detected from | 1 mm | 3 mm |
| Obstacle detected from | 2 mm | 4 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Power-cut backup | 30 min | 30 min |
| Safety rope | 3.3 m | 3.3 m |
| Rope rating | Not published | Not published |
| Fault self-check | No | No |
| Backup battery | 3,000 mAh | 3,000 mAh |
| Rope tensile rating | 1,900 N on the German page, 1,600 N on the US page | Not published |
| Edge sensing response | 0.02 s | Not published |
| Stated protection layers | 10 | 9 |
| Navigation | ||
| Path planning | Yes | Yes |
| Resumes after interruption | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to start | Yes | Yes |
| Steers round obstacles | Yes | Yes |
| Control | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice prompts | No | Yes |
| Cable reach | 3.5 m | 3.5 m |
| Cordless | No | No |
| Mains lead | 1.2 m | 1.2 m |
| Colours | Not published | Grey or beige |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | Not published | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.3 kg | 1.3 kg |
| L × W × H | 215 × 215 × 55 mm | 215 × 215 × 55 mm |
| Noise | Not published | 63 dB |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 24 months | 24 months |
| Released | 2026 | Not published |
Also worth a look
- MOVA79
N1
MOVA's light 8,000 Pa window robot: sprays from a 120 ml tank for 32 m², plans a Z or N route, talks you through the job in 15 languages and holds on for 30 minutes after a power cut.
- Ecovacs78
WINBOT W3 OMNI
Ecovacs' 2026 flagship: 10,000 Pa, a TruEdge corner scrubber, six nozzles on an 80 ml tank for 50 m², 16 cm/s, and a 10 kg station that washes the pads itself and runs 130 minutes off the mains.
- Dreame77
C1 Station S
Dreame's C1 with an 8,000 Pa motor and a portable battery station: corner brushes, 14 cm/s with resume and return to start, a 140 kg-rated cable, 63 dB, panes to 2.5 × 4 m, on glass, marble or tiles.
Other comparisons
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2
- Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W3 OMNI
- Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs Dreame C1 Station S
- Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI
- Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI
- Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs MOVA T1 Station
- Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs Dreame C1
- Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W3 OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Dreame C1 Station S vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- MOVA T1 Station vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Dreame C1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Ecovacs WINBOT MINI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO

