Head to head · Window cleaning robots
Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI
The maker's shops no longer list the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI; we last saw it there on September 10, 2026. Read its review →
Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO or W2 PRO OMNI? Verdict Scores 70 and 68. The W2 PRO OMNI leads on adhesion and ease of use. Which to choose, from published specs.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

Ecovacs press image

Ecovacs press image
Verdict
The Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO has the higher Verdict Score, 70 to 68.
The Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO has the edge in value. The Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI has the edge in adhesion and ease of use.
No published figure puts the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO ahead. In the manufacturers' published figures the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI is ahead on one row: suction (5,500 Pa against 5,300 Pa).
The Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO suits ground-floor and interior glass close to a socket. The Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI suits balconies, stairwells and rooms without a socket.
Brand guides
Where the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO is ahead
- Value57 · 25
Where the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI is ahead
- Adhesion68 · 66
- Ease of Use76 · 61
- Suction5,500 Pa · 5,300 Pa
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Ecovacs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO | Ecovacs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
70/100 ≈ $380Price in the manufacturer's shop | 68/100 ≈ $650Price last seen | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price | Check price | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 70/100 | 68/100 |
| Cleaning | 59 | 59 |
| Adhesion | 66 | 68 |
| Coverage | 73 | 73 |
| Safety | 76 | 76 |
| Navigation | 100 | 100 |
| Ease of Use | 61 | 76 |
| Reliability | 62 | 62 |
| Value | 57 | 25 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Spray system | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | 60 ml | 60 ml |
| Glass per fill | 40 m² | 40 m² |
| Cleaning speed | Not published | Not published |
| Cleaning modes | 7 | 7 |
| Corner cleaning | No | No |
| Time per square metre | About 1 min 45 s, fast mode | About 1 min 45 s, fast mode |
| Spray nozzles | 6 | 6 |
| Cloth | Double-sided microfibre, 2 in the box | Not published |
| Area on one station charge | Not published | About 55 m² fast mode, 22 m² deep mode |
| Adhesion | ||
| Suction | 5,300 Pa | 5,500 Pa |
| Pressure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Suction while moving | 2,800 Pa | 2,800 Pa |
| Fit | ||
| Largest pane | Not published | Not published |
| Smallest pane | 30 × 40 cm | 30 × 40 cm |
| Edge detection | Yes | Yes |
| Other surfaces | No | No |
| Frame detected from | 2 mm | 2 mm |
| Obstacle detected from | 4 mm | 4 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Power-cut backup | 30 min | 30 min |
| Safety rope | 6 m | Yes |
| Rope rating | Not published | Not published |
| Fault self-check | No | No |
| Backup battery | 3,000 mAh | Not published |
| Stated protection layers | 10 | 12 |
| Station | Not published | 5.5 kg, suction cup over 800 N, auto-winding cable |
| Navigation | ||
| Path planning | Yes | Yes |
| Resumes after interruption | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to start | Yes | Yes |
| Steers round obstacles | Yes | Yes |
| Control | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice prompts | Yes | Yes |
| Cable reach | 5.5 m | 5.5 m |
| Cordless | No | Yes |
| Mains lead | 1.2 m | Not published |
| Voice prompt languages | Not published | 11+ |
| Mains lead to the station | Not published | 1.8 m |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | 4,500 mAh |
| Runtime | Not published | 1 h 50 min |
| Charging time | Not published | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.8 kg | 1.6 kg |
| L × W × H | 271 × 271 × 78 mm | 271 × 271 × 77 mm |
| Noise | 63 dB | 63 dB |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 24 months | 24 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
Also worth a look
- MOVA79
MOVA N1
MOVA's light 8,000 Pa window robot: sprays from a 120 ml tank for 32 m², plans a Z or N route, talks you through the job in 15 languages and holds on for 30 minutes after a power cut.
- Mamibot70
Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
Mamibot's flagship with a squeegee: 8,000 Pa, a 215 ml tank for 35 m², four-side edge sensors, five modes, a 650 mAh backup for 25 minutes and a combined cable and rope, for glass, tiles or marble.
- Ecovacs71
Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
A 215 mm window robot for small and narrow panes from 22 × 25 cm: 7,500 Pa, ultrasonic misting from a 60 ml tank for 25 m², three modes, 1.3 kg and 30 minutes of grip after a power cut.
Other comparisons
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT W3 OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Dreame C1 Station S vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- MOVA T1 Station vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Dreame C1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT MINI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300