Head to head · Window cleaning robots
MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
MOVA N1 or Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO? Verdict Scores 79 and 70. The N1: water tank 120 vs 60 ml; the WINBOT W2 PRO: glass per fill 40 vs 32 m².
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

MOVA press image

Ecovacs press image
Verdict
The MOVA N1 has the higher Verdict Score, 79 to 70.
The MOVA N1 has the edge in cleaning, safety, coverage, adhesion, value and ease of use. The Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO has the edge in navigation and reliability.
In the manufacturers' published figures the MOVA N1 is ahead on 2 rows: water tank (120 ml against 60 ml) and suction (8,000 Pa against 5,300 Pa). In turn, the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO is ahead on 3 rows: glass per fill (40 m² against 32 m²), smallest pane (30 × 40 cm against 30 × 45 cm) and noise (63 dB against 72 dB).
The MOVA N1 suits upstairs and exterior glass where the power-cut backup matters. The Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO suits ground-floor and interior glass close to a socket.
Where the MOVA N1 is ahead
- Cleaning67 · 59
- Adhesion100 · 66
- Coverage75 · 73
- Safety96 · 76
- Ease of Use66 · 61
- Value100 · 57
- Water tank120 ml · 60 ml
- Suction8,000 Pa · 5,300 Pa
Where the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO is ahead
- Navigation100 · 60
- Reliability62 · 61
- Glass per fill40 m² · 32 m²
- Smallest pane30 × 40 cm · 30 × 45 cm
- Noise63 dB · 72 dB
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | MOVA MOVA N1 | Ecovacs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
79/100 ≈ $190Price in the manufacturer's shop | 70/100 ≈ $380Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 79/100 | 70/100 |
| Cleaning | 67 | 59 |
| Adhesion | 100 | 66 |
| Coverage | 75 | 73 |
| Safety | 96 | 76 |
| Navigation | 60 | 100 |
| Ease of Use | 66 | 61 |
| Reliability | 61 | 62 |
| Value | 100 | 57 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Spray system | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | 120 ml | 60 ml |
| Glass per fill | 32 m² | 40 m² |
| Cleaning speed | Not published | Not published |
| Cleaning modes | 6 | 7 |
| Corner cleaning | No | No |
| Stated area coverage | > 90% | Not published |
| Cloth | Washable microfibre, 2 in the box | Double-sided microfibre, 2 in the box |
| Time per square metre | Not published | About 1 min 45 s, fast mode |
| Spray nozzles | Not published | 6 |
| Adhesion | ||
| Suction | 8,000 Pa | 5,300 Pa |
| Pressure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Pressure compensation response | 0.02 s | Not published |
| Suction while moving | Not published | 2,800 Pa |
| Fit | ||
| Largest pane | 200 × 300 cm | Not published |
| Smallest pane | 30 × 45 cm | 30 × 40 cm |
| Edge detection | Yes | Yes |
| Other surfaces | Yes | No |
| Frame detected from | Not published | 2 mm |
| Obstacle detected from | Not published | 4 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Power-cut backup | 30 min | 30 min |
| Safety rope | Yes | 6 m |
| Rope rating | Not published | Not published |
| Fault self-check | Yes | No |
| Stated protection layers | 12 | 10 |
| Backup battery | Not published | 3,000 mAh |
| Navigation | ||
| Path planning | Yes | Yes |
| Resumes after interruption | No | Yes |
| Returns to start | No | Yes |
| Steers round obstacles | Yes | Yes |
| Control | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice prompts | Yes | Yes |
| Cable reach | Not published | 5.5 m |
| Cordless | No | No |
| Voice prompt languages | 15 | Not published |
| Mains lead | Not published | 1.2 m |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | Not published | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.3 kg | 1.8 kg |
| L × W × H | 215 × 215 × 59 mm | 271 × 271 × 78 mm |
| Noise | 72 dB | 63 dB |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | Not published | 24 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Warranty (Polish shop) | Up to 3 years | Not published |
Also worth a look
- Ecovacs78
Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2
The slim Winbot for narrow panes from 25 × 25 cm: 8,000 Pa, felt brushes at all four corners, ultrasonic mist from a 50 ml tank for 30 m², WIN-SLAM 4.0 and 30 minutes of grip after a power cut.
- Dreame75
Dreame C1 Station S
Dreame's C1 with an 8,000 Pa motor and a portable battery station: corner brushes, 14 cm/s with resume and return to start, a 140 kg-rated cable, 63 dB, panes to 2.5 × 4 m, on glass, marble or tiles.
- Ecovacs75
Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI
The Winbot with a corner scrubber: 8,000 Pa, a TruEdge brush that drops into the corners at 200 rpm, an 80 ml tank for 50 m² and a 5.2 kg battery station for 110 minutes off the mains.
Other comparisons
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W3 OMNI
- MOVA N1 vs Dreame C1 Station S
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI
- MOVA N1 vs MOVA T1 Station
- MOVA N1 vs Dreame C1
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300 vs MOVA N1
- Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT W3 OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Dreame C1 Station S vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- MOVA T1 Station vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Dreame C1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT MINI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300