Head to head · Window cleaning robots
Ecovacs WINBOT MINI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI
The maker's shops no longer list the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI; we last saw it there on September 10, 2026. Read its review →
Ecovacs WINBOT MINI or W2 PRO OMNI? The WINBOT MINI: smallest pane 22 × 25 vs 30 × 40 cm. Verdict Scores 71 and 68. The W2 PRO OMNI leads on cleaning.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

Ecovacs press image

Ecovacs press image
Verdict
The Ecovacs WINBOT MINI has the higher Verdict Score, 71 to 68.
The Ecovacs WINBOT MINI has the edge in coverage and value. The Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI has the edge in cleaning, adhesion and ease of use.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Ecovacs WINBOT MINI is ahead on 2 rows: suction (7,500 Pa against 5,500 Pa) and smallest pane (22 × 25 cm against 30 × 40 cm). In turn, the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI is ahead on 2 rows: glass per fill (40 m² against 25 m²) and cable reach (5.5 m against 3.5 m).
The Ecovacs WINBOT MINI suits small and narrow panes: windows with glazing bars, bathroom glass, shower screens. The Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI suits balconies, stairwells and rooms without a socket.
Brand guides
Where the Ecovacs WINBOT MINI is ahead
- Coverage76 · 73
- Value100 · 25
- Suction7,500 Pa · 5,500 Pa
- Smallest pane22 × 25 cm · 30 × 40 cm
Where the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI is ahead
- Cleaning59 · 39
- Adhesion68 · 64
- Ease of Use76 · 70
- Glass per fill40 m² · 25 m²
- Cable reach5.5 m · 3.5 m
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Ecovacs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI | Ecovacs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
71/100 ≈ $220Price in the manufacturer's shop | 68/100 ≈ $650Price last seen | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price | Check price | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 71/100 | 68/100 |
| Cleaning | 39 | 59 |
| Adhesion | 64 | 68 |
| Coverage | 76 | 73 |
| Safety | 76 | 76 |
| Navigation | 100 | 100 |
| Ease of Use | 70 | 76 |
| Reliability | 62 | 62 |
| Value | 100 | 25 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Spray system | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | 60 ml | 60 ml |
| Glass per fill | 25 m² | 40 m² |
| Cleaning speed | Not published | Not published |
| Cleaning modes | 3 | 7 |
| Corner cleaning | No | No |
| Spray | Ultrasonic mist, 10 µm droplets, four nozzles | Not published |
| Time per square metre | About 3 minutes, fast mode | About 1 min 45 s, fast mode |
| Stated area coverage | Up to 99.5% with the bumpers removed | Not published |
| Area on one station charge | Not published | About 55 m² fast mode, 22 m² deep mode |
| Spray nozzles | Not published | 6 |
| Adhesion | ||
| Suction | 7,500 Pa | 5,500 Pa |
| Pressure compensation | No | Yes |
| Suction while moving | 3,200 Pa | 2,800 Pa |
| Fit | ||
| Largest pane | Not published | Not published |
| Smallest pane | 22 × 25 cm | 30 × 40 cm |
| Edge detection | Yes | Yes |
| Other surfaces | No | No |
| Frame detected from | 3 mm | 2 mm |
| Obstacle detected from | 4 mm | 4 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Power-cut backup | 30 min | 30 min |
| Safety rope | 3.3 m | Yes |
| Rope rating | Not published | Not published |
| Fault self-check | No | No |
| Backup battery | 3,000 mAh | Not published |
| Stated protection layers | 9 | 12 |
| Station | Not published | 5.5 kg, suction cup over 800 N, auto-winding cable |
| Navigation | ||
| Path planning | Yes | Yes |
| Resumes after interruption | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to start | Yes | Yes |
| Steers round obstacles | Yes | Yes |
| Control | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice prompts | Yes | Yes |
| Cable reach | 3.5 m | 5.5 m |
| Cordless | No | Yes |
| Mains lead | 1.2 m | Not published |
| Colours | Grey or beige | Not published |
| Voice prompt languages | Not published | 11+ |
| Mains lead to the station | Not published | 1.8 m |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | 4,500 mAh |
| Runtime | Not published | 1 h 50 min |
| Charging time | Not published | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.3 kg | 1.6 kg |
| L × W × H | 215 × 215 × 55 mm | 271 × 271 × 77 mm |
| Noise | 63 dB | 63 dB |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 24 months | 24 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
Also worth a look
- MOVA79
MOVA N1
MOVA's light 8,000 Pa window robot: sprays from a 120 ml tank for 32 m², plans a Z or N route, talks you through the job in 15 languages and holds on for 30 minutes after a power cut.
- Ecovacs70
Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
Ecovacs' corded entry-level Winbot: 5,300 Pa, six spray nozzles on a 60 ml tank for 40 m², seven modes on a planned WIN-SLAM route, an edge mode and 30 minutes of grip after a power cut.
- Mamibot70
Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
Mamibot's flagship with a squeegee: 8,000 Pa, a 215 ml tank for 35 m², four-side edge sensors, five modes, a 650 mAh backup for 25 minutes and a combined cable and rope, for glass, tiles or marble.
Other comparisons
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W3 OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Dreame C1 Station S vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- MOVA T1 Station vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Dreame C1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Ecovacs WINBOT MINI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO