Head to head · Window cleaning robots
Dreame C1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI
The maker's shops no longer list the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI; we last saw it there on September 10, 2026. Read its review →
Dreame C1 or Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI? Verdict Scores 72 and 68. The C1: water tank 80 vs 60 ml. The WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI leads on safety.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

Dreame press image

Ecovacs press image
Verdict
The Dreame C1 has the higher Verdict Score, 72 to 68.
The Dreame C1 has the edge in cleaning, coverage and value. The Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI has the edge in safety, ease of use and reliability.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Dreame C1 is ahead on one row: water tank (80 ml against 60 ml). No published figure puts the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI ahead.
The Dreame C1 suits tall panes and stairwell glass where the route and the reach matter. The Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI suits balconies, stairwells and rooms without a socket.
Brand guides
Where the Dreame C1 is ahead
- Cleaning68 · 59
- Coverage97 · 73
- Value49 · 25
- Water tank80 ml · 60 ml
Where the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI is ahead
- Safety76 · 61
- Ease of Use76 · 56
- Reliability62 · 61
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Dreame Dreame C1 | Ecovacs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
72/100 ≈ $430Price in the manufacturer's shop | 68/100 ≈ $650Price last seen | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 72/100 | 68/100 |
| Cleaning | 68 | 59 |
| Adhesion | 68 | 68 |
| Coverage | 97 | 73 |
| Safety | 61 | 76 |
| Navigation | 100 | 100 |
| Ease of Use | 56 | 76 |
| Reliability | 61 | 62 |
| Value | 49 | 25 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Spray system | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | 80 ml | 60 ml |
| Glass per fill | Not published | 40 m² |
| Cleaning speed | 14 cm/s | Not published |
| Cleaning modes | 5 | 7 |
| Corner cleaning | Yes | No |
| Cleaning cycle per fill | 60 min | Not published |
| Stated area coverage | > 90% | Not published |
| Corner brushes in the box | 8 | Not published |
| Time per square metre | Not published | About 1 min 45 s, fast mode |
| Area on one station charge | Not published | About 55 m² fast mode, 22 m² deep mode |
| Spray nozzles | Not published | 6 |
| Adhesion | ||
| Suction | 5,500 Pa | 5,500 Pa |
| Pressure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Sustained vacuum | 3,300 Pa | Not published |
| Suction while moving | Not published | 2,800 Pa |
| Fit | ||
| Largest pane | 250 × 400 cm | Not published |
| Smallest pane | 30 × 40 cm | 30 × 40 cm |
| Edge detection | Yes | Yes |
| Other surfaces | Yes | No |
| Edge sensing response | 0.02 s | Not published |
| Frame detected from | Not published | 2 mm |
| Obstacle detected from | Not published | 4 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Power-cut backup | Not published | 30 min |
| Safety rope | Yes | Yes |
| Rope rating | 140 kg | Not published |
| Fault self-check | No | No |
| Station | Not published | 5.5 kg, suction cup over 800 N, auto-winding cable |
| Stated protection layers | Not published | 12 |
| Navigation | ||
| Path planning | Yes | Yes |
| Resumes after interruption | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to start | Yes | Yes |
| Steers round obstacles | Yes | Yes |
| Control | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice prompts | No | Yes |
| Cable reach | 5.5 m | 5.5 m |
| Cordless | No | Yes |
| Mains lead | 1.8 m | Not published |
| Cordless option | C1 Station S kit with a battery station, sold separately | Not published |
| Voice prompt languages | Not published | 11+ |
| Mains lead to the station | Not published | 1.8 m |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | 4,500 mAh |
| Runtime | Not published | 1 h 50 min |
| Charging time | Not published | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 1.6 kg |
| L × W × H | 270 × 270 × 81 mm | 271 × 271 × 77 mm |
| Noise | 63 dB | 63 dB |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | Not published | 24 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
Also worth a look
- MOVA79
MOVA N1
MOVA's light 8,000 Pa window robot: sprays from a 120 ml tank for 32 m², plans a Z or N route, talks you through the job in 15 languages and holds on for 30 minutes after a power cut.
- Ecovacs70
Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
Ecovacs' corded entry-level Winbot: 5,300 Pa, six spray nozzles on a 60 ml tank for 40 m², seven modes on a planned WIN-SLAM route, an edge mode and 30 minutes of grip after a power cut.
- Mamibot70
Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
Mamibot's flagship with a squeegee: 8,000 Pa, a 215 ml tank for 35 m², four-side edge sensors, five modes, a 650 mAh backup for 25 minutes and a combined cable and rope, for glass, tiles or marble.
Other comparisons
- MOVA N1 vs Dreame C1
- Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs Dreame C1
- Ecovacs WINBOT W3 OMNI vs Dreame C1
- Dreame C1 Station S vs Dreame C1
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Dreame C1
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Dreame C1
- MOVA T1 Station vs Dreame C1
- Dreame C1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Dreame C1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Dreame C1 vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300