Head to head · Window cleaning robots
Dreame C1 vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
Dreame C1 or Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300? Verdict Scores 73 and 71, where each leads on published specs and which to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The Dreame C1 has the higher Verdict Score, 73 to 71.
The Dreame C1 has the edge in coverage, navigation, value, ease of use and reliability. The Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300 has the edge in cleaning, safety and adhesion.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Dreame C1 is ahead on 2 rows: smallest pane (30 × 40 cm against 60 × 60 cm) and noise (63 dB against 70 dB). In turn, the Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300 is ahead on 2 rows: water tank (215 ml against 80 ml) and suction (8,000 Pa against 5,500 Pa).
The Dreame C1 suits tall panes and stairwell glass where the route and the reach matter. The Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300 suits large panes and shop fronts, where the tank and the squeegee pay off.
Where the Dreame C1 is ahead
- Coverage97 · 76
- Navigation100 · 40
- Ease of Use56 · 54
- Reliability61 · 44
- Value65 · 58
- Smallest pane30 × 40 cm · 60 × 60 cm
- Noise63 dB · 70 dB
Where the Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300 is ahead
- Cleaning87 · 67
- Adhesion100 · 68
- Safety69 · 61
- Water tank215 ml · 80 ml
- Suction8,000 Pa · 5,500 Pa
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Dreame C1 | Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ||
73/100 ≈ $430Price in the manufacturer's shop | 71/100 Not published | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 73/100 | 71/100 |
| Cleaning | 67 | 87 |
| Adhesion | 68 | 100 |
| Coverage | 97 | 76 |
| Safety | 61 | 69 |
| Navigation | 100 | 40 |
| Ease of Use | 56 | 54 |
| Reliability | 61 | 44 |
| Value | 65 | 58 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Spray system | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | 80 ml | 215 ml |
| Glass per fill | Not published | 35 m² |
| Cleaning speed | 14 cm/s | Not published |
| Cleaning modes | 5 | 5 |
| Corner cleaning | Yes | Yes |
| Cleaning cycle per fill | 60 min | Not published |
| Stated area coverage | > 90% | Not published |
| Corner brushes in the box | 8 | Not published |
| Squeegee | Not published | FlexSqueegee, adaptive, after the spray and the wipe |
| Spray nozzles | Not published | 4, two each side, atomised |
| Modes | Not published | Fast, deep, edge, spot and manual |
| Adhesion | ||
| Suction | 5,500 Pa | 8,000 Pa |
| Pressure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Sustained vacuum | 3,300 Pa | Not published |
| Fit | ||
| Largest pane | 250 × 400 cm | Not published |
| Smallest pane | 30 × 40 cm | 60 × 60 cm |
| Edge detection | Yes | Yes |
| Other surfaces | Yes | Yes |
| Edge sensing response | 0.02 s | Not published |
| Minimum glass thickness | Not published | 3 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Power-cut backup | Not published | 25 min |
| Safety rope | Yes | Combined with the power cable, no length or rating printed |
| Rope rating | 140 kg | Not published |
| Fault self-check | No | No |
| Backup battery | Not published | 650 mAh, 25 to 30 minutes of holding |
| Navigation | ||
| Path planning | Yes | Yes |
| Resumes after interruption | Yes | No |
| Returns to start | Yes | No |
| Steers round obstacles | Yes | No |
| Control | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice prompts | No | No |
| Cable reach | 5.5 m | Not published |
| Cordless | No | No |
| Mains lead | 1.8 m | Not published |
| Cordless option | C1 Station S kit with a battery station, sold separately | Not published |
| Firmware updates | Not published | Over the air, from the app |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | Not published | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.6 kg | Not published |
| L × W × H | 270 × 270 × 81 mm | 270 × 270 × 69 mm |
| Noise | 63 dB | 70 dB |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | Not published | 12 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Battery warranty | Not published | 6 months |
Also worth a look
- Ecovacs79
WINBOT mini 2
The slim Winbot for narrow panes from 25 × 25 cm: 8,000 Pa, felt brushes at all four corners, ultrasonic mist from a 50 ml tank for 30 m², WIN-SLAM 4.0 and 30 minutes of grip after a power cut.
- MOVA79
N1
MOVA's light 8,000 Pa window robot: sprays from a 120 ml tank for 32 m², plans a Z or N route, talks you through the job in 15 languages and holds on for 30 minutes after a power cut.
- Ecovacs78
WINBOT W3 OMNI
Ecovacs' 2026 flagship: 10,000 Pa, a TruEdge corner scrubber, six nozzles on an 80 ml tank for 50 m², 16 cm/s, and a 10 kg station that washes the pads itself and runs 130 minutes off the mains.
Other comparisons
- Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs Dreame C1
- MOVA N1 vs Dreame C1
- Ecovacs WINBOT W3 OMNI vs Dreame C1
- Dreame C1 Station S vs Dreame C1
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Dreame C1
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Dreame C1
- MOVA T1 Station vs Dreame C1
- Dreame C1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
- MOVA N1 vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
- Ecovacs WINBOT W3 OMNI vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
- Dreame C1 Station S vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
- MOVA T1 Station vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
