Head to head · Robot vacuums

Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Roborock Qrevo Edge 2 Flow

Verdict Scores 87 and 88. The Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete: dust bag interval 100 vs 65 days; the Qrevo Edge 2 Flow: suction 35,000 vs 30,000 Pa.

Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated

Verdict

The Roborock Qrevo Edge 2 Flow has the higher Verdict Score, 88 to 87.

The Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete has the edge in navigation and automation. The Roborock Qrevo Edge 2 Flow has the edge in mopping, obstacle avoidance, value and reliability.

In the manufacturers' published figures the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete is ahead on one row: dust bag interval (100 days against 65 days). In turn, the Roborock Qrevo Edge 2 Flow is ahead on one row: suction (35,000 Pa against 30,000 Pa).

Both suit kitchens and hard floors with dried-on spills.

This comparison is computed from our specification database and is not edited individually. Method: specification analysis of the makers' published figures, explained on our scoring and editorial policy pages.

RoborockNew model
Roborock Qrevo Edge 2 Flow≈ $650

Where the Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete is ahead

  • Navigation92 · 88
  • Automation90 · 88
  • Dust bag interval100 days · 65 days

Where the Roborock Qrevo Edge 2 Flow is ahead

  • Mopping97 · 95
  • Obstacle Avoidance100 · 95
  • Reliability73 · 64
  • Value57 · 52
  • Suction35,000 Pa · 30,000 Pa

Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.

Where to buy

Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

Full specification, side by side

Compare
Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete
Dreame press image
Roborock Qrevo Edge 2 Flow
Roborock press image
$1,000Price in the manufacturer's shop
≈ $650Price in the manufacturer's shop
Highest Verdict Score

Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

Check price on Amazon.comSearch on Amazon.com
At a glance
Leads on
  • Navigation
  • Automation
  • Mopping
  • Obstacle Avoidance
  • Reliability
  • Value
Pros
  • Roller mop at 9 to 11 N that slides to the wall and lifts 14 mm, with a carpet boost
  • Legs for 4.2 cm sills and 8 cm double steps, LiDAR down to 97.5 mm
  • Two AI cameras with structured light, 240+ object types
  • 270 mm pressurised self-cleaning roller that meters water to the floor
  • 35,000 Pa with a carpet boost, the strongest Qrevo
  • Roller lifts 15 mm and a flap seals it off on carpet
Cons
  • No battery, runtime, bin, tank or noise figure published
  • Roller width differs between headline and footnote
  • 5.8 kg, the heaviest of Dreame's robot vacuums here
  • The shop page's header copy belongs to another model
  • No runtime, noise, bin or tank published
  • 90 mm tall, a centimetre above the Edge 2
Best for
  • Kitchens and hard floors with dried-on spills
  • Homes with sills and rugs, where the legs and the lift both matter
  • Kitchens and hard floors with dried-on spills
  • Homes mixing rugs and hard floors, where the carpet flap matters
Score breakdown
Verdict Score87/10088/100
Cleaning
93
93
Navigation
92
88
Mopping
95
97
Obstacle Avoidance
95
100
Automation
90
88
Ease of Use
94
94
Reliability
64
73
Value
52
57
Specifications

In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked.

Cleaning
Suction30,000 Pa35,000 Pa
Brush systemTangle-resistantTangle-resistant
Side brushes11
Carpet boostYesYes
DustbinNot publishedNot published
Navigation
MappingRetracting LiDARRetracting LiDAR
Obstacle avoidanceCamera + depth sensorCamera + depth sensor
Saved floor plansNot publishedNot published
Threshold climb42 mmNot published
Height with the turret raised120 mmNot published
Mopping
Mop typeWashed rollerWashed roller
Mop lift14 mm15 mm
Extending mopYesYes
Water tankNot publishedNot published
Mop rollerAquaRoll roller, 270 mm by the headline and 258 mm by the footnote, 9 to 11 N270 mm high-density roller, SpiraFlow 2.0 pressurised self-cleaning
Edge reachThe roller slides 40 mm sideways to the wallNot published
Roller reach at the edgeNot published44 mm
Carpet shieldNot publishedRoller lifts 15 mm and a flap closes over it
Dock
Self-emptyingYesYes
Mop washingYesYes
Mop wash temperature100 °CNot published
Mop dryingYesYes
Water refillYesYes
Plumbed drainNoNo
Dust bag interval100 days65 days
Warm-air drying70 °C63 °C
Detergent dispensingAutomatic, two compartmentsNot published
Dock size and weight420 × 440 × 505 mm, 11.1 kgNot published
Dock sizeNot published402 × 470 × 451 mm
Total weight with dockNot published13.5 kg
Software
No-go zonesYesYes
Pet recognitionNoYes
Power
BatteryNot published5,200 mAh
RuntimeNot publishedNot published
Charging timeNot publishedNot published
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothNoNo
4G / LTENoNo
Voice controlYesYes
Physical
Weight5.8 kg5 kg
L × W × H350 × 350 × 98 mm352 × 353 × 90 mm
NoiseNot publishedNot published
Support
WarrantyNot publishedNot published
ReleasedNot publishedNot published
Chassis
Double-step threshold8 cmNot published
Brush liftMain brush 5 mm, side brush 10 mmNot published
Obstacles
Recognised object types240+Not published

Also worth a look

  • Dreame

    Dreame X50 Master

    The X50 Ultra robot on a plumbed 249 mm dock: 20,000 Pa, legs for a 4.2 cm sill, a LiDAR that retracts to 89 mm, an 80 °C wash, 220 minutes a charge and a 3-year warranty.

  • Dreame

    Dreame L60 Pro Ultra

    The L60 with legs: 35,000 Pa, ProLeap legs for 8.8 cm double-layer thresholds, a LiDAR that retracts to 89 mm, 280 object types, mops with 40 °C water, and a 6,400 mAh battery for 220 minutes.

  • Dreame

    Dreame X50 Ultra

    The 2025 flagship that introduced Dreame's legs: 20,000 Pa, a 4.2 cm sill or 6 cm double step, 89 mm with the turret down, pads that extend and detach, an 80 °C wash and 220 minutes per charge.

Other comparisons

Side by side →