Head to head · Robot vacuums
MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro: Verdict Scores 85 and 85, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
Both score 85/100. The difference is what each is built for.
The MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone has the edge in mopping, automation, value and ease of use. The Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro has the edge in cleaning and navigation.
In the manufacturers' published figures the MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone is ahead on one row: suction (26,000 Pa against 25,000 Pa). No published figure puts the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro ahead.
The MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone suits kitchens and hallways where a wide dock will not fit. The Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro suits homes with rugs, sills and chair legs that stop lesser robots.
Where the MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone is ahead
- Mopping95 · 92
- Automation90 · 74
- Ease of Use95 · 86
- Value65 · 52
- Suction26,000 Pa · 25,000 Pa
Where the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro is ahead
- Cleaning93 · 77
- Navigation93 · 88
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
85/100 ≈ $650Price in the manufacturer's shop | 85/100 ≈ $1,180Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Check price on Amazon.de | Check price on Amazon.de | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 85/100 | 85/100 |
| Cleaning | 77 | 93 |
| Navigation | 88 | 93 |
| Mopping | 95 | 92 |
| Obstacle Avoidance | 95 | 95 |
| Automation | 90 | 74 |
| Ease of Use | 95 | 86 |
| Reliability | 73 | 73 |
| Value | 65 | 52 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Suction | 26,000 Pa | 25,000 Pa |
| Brush system | Tangle-resistant | Tangle-resistant |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet boost | No | Yes |
| Dustbin | 210 ml | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Retracting LiDAR | Retracting LiDAR |
| Obstacle avoidance | Camera + depth sensor | Camera + depth sensor |
| Saved floor plans | Not published | 3 |
| Threshold climb | Not published | Not published |
| Height with the sensor raised | 119.6 mm | Not published |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Washed roller | Twin spinning pads |
| Mop lift | 14 mm | Detaches for carpet |
| Extending mop | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | Not published | Not published |
| Mop roller | 25.6 cm roller at 4,100 Pa, extends 4.3 cm, 12 nozzles | Not published |
| Mop pressure | Not published | 12 N |
| Dock | ||
| Self-emptying | Yes | Yes |
| Mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Water refill | Yes | No |
| Plumbed drain | No | No |
| Dust bag interval | 100 days | Not published |
| Dock size | 420 × 278 × 470 mm, 278 mm wide | 450 × 450 × 450 mm |
| Water tanks | 4 l clean, 3.5 l dirty | Not published |
| Dust bag | 3.2 l | Not published |
| Detergent dispensing | 600 ml module | Not published |
| Mop washing temperature | Not published | 100 °C |
| Warm-air drying | Not published | 55 °C |
| Software | ||
| No-go zones | Yes | Yes |
| Pet waste recognition | No | No |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | Not published | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Voice control | Yes | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | Not published | Not published |
| L × W × H | 350 × 350 × 96 mm | 350 × 352 × 80 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | Not published |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Obstacles | ||
| Recognised obstacle types | 200+ | Not published |
| Recognised object types | Not published | 200+ |
| Sensors | Not published | Structured light, RGB camera, VertiBeam side laser |
| Chassis | ||
| AdaptiLift chassis | Not published | Lifts 20 mm for carpet up to 3 cm; frees itself from U-shaped chair legs |
| Double-step threshold | Not published | 4 cm |
Also worth a look
- Dreame86
Aqua10 Roller
Roller mop and legs without the retracting turret: 30,000 Pa with a carpet boost, a roller at 9 to 11 N that lifts 14 mm under a guard, a 4.2 cm sill or 6 cm double step, 120 mm tall, a 100 °C wash.
- Dreame86
X60 Max Ultra Complete
Dreame's American flagship: 35,000 Pa, 4.5 cm sills and 8.8 cm double steps, a LiDAR that drops to 79.5 mm, pads that extend, detach and run 40 °C water, an 80-minute charge and a 100 °C wash.
- Roborock86
Saros 20
Roborock's flagship: 36,000 Pa, twin spinning mops the dock washes at 100 °C, and a solid-state 3D sensor instead of a LiDAR turret.
Other comparisons
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Roborock Saros 20 vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame X50 Ultra
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete

