Head to head · Robot vacuums
Roborock Saros 20 vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
Roborock Saros 20 vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro: Verdict Scores 86 and 85, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The Roborock Saros 20 has the higher Verdict Score, 86 to 85.
The Roborock Saros 20 has the edge in navigation, automation and ease of use. The Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro has the edge in value and reliability.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Roborock Saros 20 is ahead on one row: suction (36,000 Pa against 25,000 Pa). No published figure puts the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro ahead.
The Roborock Saros 20 suits homes with a mix of hard floors and carpet. The Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro suits homes with rugs, sills and chair legs that stop lesser robots.
Where the Roborock Saros 20 is ahead
- Navigation94 · 93
- Automation89 · 74
- Ease of Use95 · 86
- Suction36,000 Pa · 25,000 Pa
Where the Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro is ahead
- Reliability73 · 64
- Value52 · 34
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Roborock Saros 20 | Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
86/100 $1,600Price in the manufacturer's shop | 85/100 ≈ $1,180Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.de | Check price on Amazon.de | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 86/100 | 85/100 |
| Cleaning | 93 | 93 |
| Navigation | 94 | 93 |
| Mopping | 92 | 92 |
| Obstacle Avoidance | 95 | 95 |
| Automation | 89 | 74 |
| Ease of Use | 95 | 86 |
| Reliability | 64 | 73 |
| Value | 34 | 52 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Suction | 36,000 Pa | 25,000 Pa |
| Brush system | Tangle-resistant | Tangle-resistant |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet boost | Yes | Yes |
| Dustbin | Not published | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Solid-state 3D ToF + camera | Retracting LiDAR |
| Obstacle avoidance | Camera + depth sensor | Camera + depth sensor |
| Saved floor plans | Not published | 3 |
| Threshold climb | 45 mm | Not published |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Twin spinning pads | Twin spinning pads |
| Mop lift | Detaches for carpet | Detaches for carpet |
| Extending mop | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | Not published | Not published |
| Mop pressure | Not published | 12 N |
| Dock | ||
| Self-emptying | Yes | Yes |
| Mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Water refill | Yes | No |
| Plumbed drain | No | No |
| Dust bag interval | Not published | Not published |
| Mop washing temperature | 212 °F / 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Warm-air drying | 131 °F / 55 °C | 55 °C |
| Detergent dispensing | Automatic | Not published |
| Dock size | Not published | 450 × 450 × 450 mm |
| Software | ||
| No-go zones | Yes | Yes |
| Pet waste recognition | No | No |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | Not published | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Voice control | Yes | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | Not published | Not published |
| L × W × H | Not published | 350 × 352 × 80 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 12 months | Not published |
| Released | 2025 | Not published |
| Chassis | ||
| Carpet pile cleared | 1.18 in / 30 mm | Not published |
| AdaptiLift chassis | Not published | Lifts 20 mm for carpet up to 3 cm; frees itself from U-shaped chair legs |
| Double-step threshold | Not published | 4 cm |
| Obstacles | ||
| Recognised object types | 300+ | 200+ |
| Sensors | Not published | Structured light, RGB camera, VertiBeam side laser |
Also worth a look
- Dreame86
Aqua10 Roller
Roller mop and legs without the retracting turret: 30,000 Pa with a carpet boost, a roller at 9 to 11 N that lifts 14 mm under a guard, a 4.2 cm sill or 6 cm double step, 120 mm tall, a 100 °C wash.
- Dreame86
X60 Max Ultra Complete
Dreame's American flagship: 35,000 Pa, 4.5 cm sills and 8.8 cm double steps, a LiDAR that drops to 79.5 mm, pads that extend, detach and run 40 °C water, an 80-minute charge and a 100 °C wash.
- Dreame85
Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete
Dreame's roller-mop flagship: 30,000 Pa, a 270 mm roller at 9 to 11 N that slides to the wall and lifts 14 mm, legs for a 4.2 cm sill or 8 cm double step, two AI cameras and a 100 °C wash.
Other comparisons
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Roborock Saros 20 Sonic
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Roborock Saros 20
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Roborock Saros 20 vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete
- Roborock Saros 20 vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame X50 Ultra
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete

