Head to head · Robot vacuums
Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Roborock Saros 20
Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Roborock Saros 20: Verdict Scores 85 and 85, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
Both score 85/100. The difference is what each is built for.
The Dreame L60 Pro Ultra has the edge in automation, value and reliability. The Roborock Saros 20 has the edge in navigation.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Dreame L60 Pro Ultra is ahead on one row: warranty (36 months against 12 months). In turn, the Roborock Saros 20 is ahead on one row: suction (36,000 Pa against 35,000 Pa).
At $1,400 against $1,600, the Dreame L60 Pro Ultra is the cheaper of the two. The Dreame L60 Pro Ultra suits homes with high door thresholds and low furniture. The Roborock Saros 20 suits homes with a mix of hard floors and carpet.
Where the Dreame L60 Pro Ultra is ahead
- Automation90 · 89
- Reliability73 · 64
- Value33 · 31
- Warranty36 months · 12 months
Where the Roborock Saros 20 is ahead
- Navigation94 · 90
- Suction36,000 Pa · 35,000 Pa
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Dreame L60 Pro Ultra | Roborock Saros 20 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
85/100 $1,400Price in the manufacturer's shop | 85/100 $1,600Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Check price on Amazon.de | Check price on Amazon.de | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 85/100 | 85/100 |
| Cleaning | 93 | 93 |
| Navigation | 90 | 94 |
| Mopping | 92 | 92 |
| Obstacle Avoidance | 95 | 95 |
| Automation | 90 | 89 |
| Ease of Use | 95 | 95 |
| Reliability | 73 | 64 |
| Value | 33 | 31 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Suction | 35,000 Pa | 36,000 Pa |
| Brush system | Tangle-resistant | Tangle-resistant |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet boost | Yes | Yes |
| Dustbin | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime, as tested | 220 minutes vacuuming and mopping in the quiet setting; 205 m² vacuuming | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Retracting LiDAR | Solid-state 3D ToF + camera |
| Obstacle avoidance | Camera + depth sensor | Camera + depth sensor |
| Saved floor plans | Not published | Not published |
| Threshold climb | Not published | 45 mm |
| Turret raised | 111 mm | Not published |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Twin spinning pads | Twin spinning pads |
| Mop lift | Detaches for carpet | Detaches for carpet |
| Extending mop | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | Not published | Not published |
| Hot-water mopping | 40 °C water on thermal pads | Not published |
| Dock | ||
| Self-emptying | Yes | Yes |
| Mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Plumbed drain | No | No |
| Dust bag interval | 100 days | Not published |
| Dust bag | 3.2 l | Not published |
| Mop washing temperature | Not published | 212 °F / 100 °C |
| Warm-air drying | Not published | 131 °F / 55 °C |
| Detergent dispensing | Not published | Automatic |
| Software | ||
| No-go zones | Yes | Yes |
| Pet waste recognition | No | No |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | 3 h 40 min | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | Yes |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Voice control | Yes | Yes |
| Matter | By a coming update | Not published |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 4.5 kg | Not published |
| L × W × H | 350 × 350 × 89 mm | Not published |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | 12 months |
| Released | Not published | 2025 |
| Obstacles | ||
| Double-layer threshold | 88 mm with the ProLeap legs; no single-step figure is published | Not published |
| Recognised object types | 280+ | 300+ |
| Fit | ||
| Dock size and weight | 340 × 456 × 590 mm, 9.3 kg | Not published |
| Chassis | ||
| Carpet pile cleared | Not published | 1.18 in / 30 mm |
Also worth a look
- Dreame87
Aqua10 Roller
Roller mop and legs without the retracting turret: 30,000 Pa with a carpet boost, a roller at 9 to 11 N that lifts 14 mm under a guard, a 4.2 cm sill or 6 cm double step, 120 mm tall, a 100 °C wash.
- MOVA86
Z60 Ultra Roller Complete
MOVA's roller mop with legs: 28,000 Pa, a roller at 4,100 Pa that extends to the wall and lifts 14 mm, 4.8 cm sills or 8 cm double steps, and a dock that washes at 80 °C, dries, refills and doses detergent.
- Roborock86
Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
A Saros-shaped Qrevo: 25,000 Pa, a fully retractable LiDAR in an 80 mm body, 12 N spinning mops left in the dock for carpet, a chassis that lifts 20 mm and takes 4 cm double steps, and a 100 °C wash.
Other comparisons
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Roborock Saros 20 Sonic
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Roborock Saros 20
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete vs Roborock Saros 20
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs Roborock Saros 20
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Roborock Saros 20
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone vs Roborock Saros 20
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame X60 Pro Master

