ROBOVERDICT

Head to head · Robot vacuums

Dreame L50 Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete

Dreame L50 Ultra or MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete? Verdict Scores 85 and 84. The L50 Ultra: dustbin 395 vs 210 ml. Which to choose, from published specs.

Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated

Verdict

The Dreame L50 Ultra has the higher Verdict Score, 85 to 84.

The Dreame L50 Ultra has the edge in cleaning and obstacle avoidance. The MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete has the edge in navigation, mopping and value.

In the manufacturers' published figures the Dreame L50 Ultra is ahead on one row: dustbin (395 ml against 210 ml). In turn, the MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete is ahead on 3 rows: suction (28,000 Pa against 19,500 Pa), threshold climb (48 mm against 42 mm) and mop wash temperature (80 °C against 75 °C).

The Dreame L50 Ultra suits homes with high sills or a step between rooms. The MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete suits flats with sills and hard floors on a mid budget.

Dreame
L50 Ultra$760
MOVA
Z60 Ultra Roller Complete≈ $710

Where the Dreame L50 Ultra is ahead

  • Cleaning92 · 77
  • Obstacle Avoidance100 · 95
  • Dustbin395 ml · 210 ml

Where the MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete is ahead

  • Navigation92 · 80
  • Mopping95 · 92
  • Value51 · 48
  • Suction28,000 Pa · 19,500 Pa
  • Threshold climb48 mm · 42 mm
  • Mop wash temperature80 °C · 75 °C

Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.

Full specification, side by side

Compare
Dreame
L50 Ultra
MOVA
Z60 Ultra Roller Complete
Dreame L50 Ultra
Dreame press image
MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete
MOVA press image
$760Price in the manufacturer's shop
≈ $710Price in the manufacturer's shop
Highest Verdict Score
Check price on Amazon.comCheck price on Amazon.com

Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.

At a glance
Leads on
  • Cleaning
  • Obstacle Avoidance
  • Navigation
  • Mopping
  • Value
Pros
  • Legs for a 4.2 cm sill or a 6 cm double step
  • RGB camera with structured light, 180+ object types and pet recognition
  • The dock washes at up to 75 °C, re-mops by the colour of the wash water, dries, refills and holds dust for 100 days
  • Roller at 4,100 Pa that extends to the wall, lifts 14 mm and hides under a guard
  • Legs for 4.8 cm sills and 8 cm double steps, sensor down to 96 mm
  • 80 °C wash, hot-air drying, refill, two detergents, 100 days of dust
Cons
  • 97 mm tall with a fixed LiDAR, against the L50 Pro Ultra's 89.5 mm
  • No noise figure, charging time or robot tank size published
  • Sold out on Dreame's Polish shop and not listed on the German one
  • No runtime, weight or noise published
  • No carpet suction boost claimed
  • 80 °C wash, not the Z70's 100 °C
Best for
  • Homes with high sills or a step between rooms
  • Pet owners who want the robot to see the animal and keep clear of it
  • Flats with sills and hard floors on a mid budget
  • First-time buyers who want a roller mop and a full dock
Score breakdown
Verdict Score85/10084/100
Cleaning
92
77
Navigation
80
92
Mopping
92
95
Obstacle Avoidance
100
95
Automation
90
90
Ease of Use
94
94
Reliability
73
73
Value
48
51
Specifications

In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked.

Cleaning
Suction19,500 Pa28,000 Pa
Brush systemTangle-resistantTangle-resistant
Side brushes11
Carpet boostYesNo
Dustbin395 ml210 ml
Side brushExtends and liftsNot published
Hair length handled without tanglingUp to 30 cmNot published
Navigation
MappingLiDARRetracting LiDAR
Obstacle avoidanceCamera + depth sensorCamera + depth sensor
Saved floor plansNot publishedNot published
Threshold climb42 mm48 mm
Height with the sensor raisedNot published119.6 mm
Mopping
Mop typeTwin spinning padsWashed roller
Mop liftDetaches for carpet14 mm
Extending mopYesYes
Water tankNot publishedNot published
Mop rollerNot publishedHydroForce roller at 4,100 Pa with a refresh roller and 12 nozzles
Carpet guardNot publishedAutoShield barrier over the lifted roller; the whole body lifts to cross rugs
Dock
Self-emptyingYesYes
Mop washingYesYes
Mop wash temperature75 °C80 °C
Mop dryingYesYes
Water refillYesYes
Plumbed drainNoNo
Dust bag interval100 days100 days
Wash temperature settingsFour, up to 75 °CNot published
Dirt detectionA colour sensor reads the wash water, sets one of 32 wash volumes and sends the robot back to re-mopNot published
Water tanks4.5 l clean, 4.0 l dirty4 l clean, 3.5 l dirty
Dust bag3.2 l3.2 l
Dock size and weight457 × 340 × 589 mm, 9.2 kgNot published
Detergent dispensingNot publishedDuoSolution, two compartments
Dock sizeNot published433 × 420 × 470 mm
Software
No-go zonesYesYes
Pet waste recognitionYesNo
Power
Battery6,400 mAh6,400 mAh
Runtime3 h 20 minNot published
Charging timeNot publishedNot published
Area per charge186 m², quiet modeNot published
Connectivity
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothNoNo
4G / LTENoNo
Voice controlYesYes
Physical
Weight4.44 kgNot published
L × W × H352 × 348 × 97 mm350 × 350 × 96 mm
NoiseNot publishedNot published
Support
Warranty36 months36 months
ReleasedNot publishedNot published
Chassis
Double-step threshold60 mm over two steps more than 40 mm apart (ProLeap legs)8 cm
Obstacles
Recognised object types180+Not published
Recognised obstacles and stainsNot published200+

Also worth a look

  • Dreame

    Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete

    Dreame's roller-mop flagship: 30,000 Pa, a 270 mm roller at 9 to 11 N that slides to the wall and lifts 14 mm, legs for a 4.2 cm sill or 8 cm double step, two AI cameras and a 100 °C wash.

  • Dreame

    X50 Master

    The X50 Ultra robot on a plumbed 249 mm dock: 20,000 Pa, legs for a 4.2 cm sill, a LiDAR that retracts to 89 mm, an 80 °C wash, 220 minutes a charge and a 3-year warranty.

  • Roborock

    Saros 20

    Roborock's flagship: 36,000 Pa, twin spinning mops the dock washes at 100 °C, and a solid-state 3D sensor instead of a LiDAR turret.

Other comparisons

Side by side →