Head to head · Window cleaning robots
MOVA N1 vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
MOVA N1 or Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300? Verdict Scores 79 and 71, where each leads on published specs and which to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The MOVA N1 has the higher Verdict Score, 79 to 71.
The MOVA N1 has the edge in safety, navigation, value, ease of use and reliability. The Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300 has the edge in cleaning and coverage.
In the manufacturers' published figures the MOVA N1 is ahead on 2 rows: smallest pane (30 × 45 cm against 60 × 60 cm) and power-cut backup (30 min against 25 min). In turn, the Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300 is ahead on 3 rows: water tank (215 ml against 120 ml), glass per fill (35 m² against 32 m²) and noise (70 dB against 72 dB).
The MOVA N1 suits upstairs and exterior glass where the power-cut backup matters. The Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300 suits large panes and shop fronts, where the tank and the squeegee pay off.
Where the MOVA N1 is ahead
- Safety96 · 69
- Navigation60 · 40
- Ease of Use67 · 54
- Reliability61 · 44
- Value100 · 58
- Smallest pane30 × 45 cm · 60 × 60 cm
- Power-cut backup30 min · 25 min
Where the Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300 is ahead
- Cleaning87 · 66
- Coverage76 · 75
- Water tank215 ml · 120 ml
- Glass per fill35 m² · 32 m²
- Noise70 dB · 72 dB
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | MOVA N1 | Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300 |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ||
79/100 ≈ $190Price in the manufacturer's shop | 71/100 Not published | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 79/100 | 71/100 |
| Cleaning | 66 | 87 |
| Adhesion | 100 | 100 |
| Coverage | 75 | 76 |
| Safety | 96 | 69 |
| Navigation | 60 | 40 |
| Ease of Use | 67 | 54 |
| Reliability | 61 | 44 |
| Value | 100 | 58 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Spray system | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | 120 ml | 215 ml |
| Glass per fill | 32 m² | 35 m² |
| Cleaning speed | Not published | Not published |
| Cleaning modes | 6 | 5 |
| Corner cleaning | No | Yes |
| Stated area coverage | > 90% | Not published |
| Cloth | Washable microfibre, 2 in the box | Not published |
| Squeegee | Not published | FlexSqueegee, adaptive, after the spray and the wipe |
| Spray nozzles | Not published | 4, two each side, atomised |
| Modes | Not published | Fast, deep, edge, spot and manual |
| Adhesion | ||
| Suction | 8,000 Pa | 8,000 Pa |
| Pressure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Pressure compensation response | 0.02 s | Not published |
| Fit | ||
| Largest pane | 200 × 300 cm | Not published |
| Smallest pane | 30 × 45 cm | 60 × 60 cm |
| Edge detection | Yes | Yes |
| Other surfaces | Yes | Yes |
| Minimum glass thickness | Not published | 3 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Power-cut backup | 30 min | 25 min |
| Safety rope | Yes | Combined with the power cable, no length or rating printed |
| Rope rating | Not published | Not published |
| Fault self-check | Yes | No |
| Stated protection layers | 12 | Not published |
| Backup battery | Not published | 650 mAh, 25 to 30 minutes of holding |
| Navigation | ||
| Path planning | Yes | Yes |
| Resumes after interruption | No | No |
| Returns to start | No | No |
| Steers round obstacles | Yes | No |
| Control | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice prompts | Yes | No |
| Cable reach | Not published | Not published |
| Cordless | No | No |
| Voice prompt languages | 15 | Not published |
| Firmware updates | Not published | Over the air, from the app |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | Not published | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.3 kg | Not published |
| L × W × H | 215 × 215 × 59 mm | 270 × 270 × 69 mm |
| Noise | 72 dB | 70 dB |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | Not published | 12 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Warranty (Polish shop) | Up to 3 years | Not published |
| Battery warranty | Not published | 6 months |
Also worth a look
- Ecovacs79
WINBOT mini 2
The slim Winbot for narrow panes from 25 × 25 cm: 8,000 Pa, felt brushes at all four corners, ultrasonic mist from a 50 ml tank for 30 m², WIN-SLAM 4.0 and 30 minutes of grip after a power cut.
- Ecovacs78
WINBOT W3 OMNI
Ecovacs' 2026 flagship: 10,000 Pa, a TruEdge corner scrubber, six nozzles on an 80 ml tank for 50 m², 16 cm/s, and a 10 kg station that washes the pads itself and runs 130 minutes off the mains.
- Dreame77
C1 Station S
Dreame's C1 with an 8,000 Pa motor and a portable battery station: corner brushes, 14 cm/s with resume and return to start, a 140 kg-rated cable, 63 dB, panes to 2.5 × 4 m, on glass, marble or tiles.
Other comparisons
- Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs MOVA N1
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W3 OMNI
- MOVA N1 vs Dreame C1 Station S
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI
- MOVA N1 vs MOVA T1 Station
- MOVA N1 vs Dreame C1
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- Ecovacs WINBOT mini 2 vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
- Ecovacs WINBOT W3 OMNI vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
- Dreame C1 Station S vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
- MOVA T1 Station vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
- Dreame C1 vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO vs Mamibot iGLASSBOT W300
