Head to head · Window cleaning robots
Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI
Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI: Verdict Scores 72 and 66, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI has the higher Verdict Score, 72 to 66.
The Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI has the edge in cleaning, adhesion and value. The Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI has the edge in ease of use.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI is ahead on 3 rows: water tank (120 ml against 60 ml), glass per fill (75 m² against 40 m²) and suction (10,000 Pa against 5,500 Pa). In turn, the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI is ahead on one row: noise (63 dB against 66 dB).
The Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI suits large glazed areas and patio doors done on one fill. The Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI suits balconies, stairwells and rooms without a socket.
Where the Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI is ahead
- Cleaning85 · 57
- Adhesion70 · 68
- Value26 · 25
- Water tank120 ml · 60 ml
- Glass per fill75 m² · 40 m²
- Suction10,000 Pa · 5,500 Pa
Where the Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI is ahead
- Ease of Use76 · 63
- Noise63 dB · 66 dB
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI | Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
72/100 ≈ $650Price in the manufacturer's shop | 66/100 ≈ $650Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price | Check price | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 72/100 | 66/100 |
| Cleaning | 85 | 57 |
| Adhesion | 70 | 68 |
| Coverage | 63 | 63 |
| Safety | 76 | 76 |
| Navigation | 100 | 100 |
| Ease of Use | 63 | 76 |
| Reliability | 62 | 62 |
| Value | 26 | 25 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Spray system | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | 120 ml | 60 ml |
| Glass per fill | 75 m² | 40 m² |
| Cleaning speed | Not published | Not published |
| Cleaning modes | 8 | 7 |
| Corner cleaning | Yes | No |
| Edge cleaning | TruEdge 2.0, radial edge-locking, flush to the frame | Not published |
| Spray | High-pressure pump, six nozzles, 90% water coverage | Not published |
| Time per square metre | About 1 min 30 s, fast mode | About 1 min 45 s, fast mode |
| Area on one station charge | About 72 m² fast mode, 26 m² deep mode | About 55 m² fast mode, 22 m² deep mode |
| Path memory | Yes | Not published |
| Spray nozzles | Not published | 6 |
| Adhesion | ||
| Suction | 10,000 Pa | 5,500 Pa |
| Pressure compensation | No | Yes |
| Suction while moving | 3,300 Pa | 2,800 Pa |
| Fit | ||
| Largest pane | Not published | Not published |
| Smallest pane | 30 × 40 cm | 30 × 40 cm |
| Edge detection | Yes | Yes |
| Other surfaces | No | No |
| Obstacle detected from | 2 mm | 4 mm |
| Maximum pane tilt | 45° | Not published |
| Frame detected from | Not published | 2 mm |
| Safety | ||
| Power-cut backup | 30 min | 30 min |
| Safety rope | Yes | Yes |
| Rope rating | Not published | Not published |
| Fault self-check | No | No |
| Station | 5 kg, suction cup over 800 N, auto-winding cable | 5.5 kg, suction cup over 800 N, auto-winding cable |
| Stated protection layers | 12 | 12 |
| Navigation | ||
| Path planning | Yes | Yes |
| Resumes after interruption | Yes | Yes |
| Returns to start | Yes | Yes |
| Steers round obstacles | Yes | Yes |
| Control | ||
| Remote control | Yes | Yes |
| Voice prompts | Yes | Yes |
| Cable reach | 5.5 m | 5.5 m |
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Noise reduction | Four-stage | Not published |
| Voice prompt languages | Not published | 11+ |
| Mains lead to the station | Not published | 1.8 m |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | 1 h 50 min | 1 h 50 min |
| Charging time | 3 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 2.1 kg | 1.6 kg |
| L × W × H | 272 × 272 × 76 mm | 271 × 271 × 77 mm |
| Noise | 66 dB | 63 dB |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 24 months | 24 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
Also worth a look
- MOVA79
N1
MOVA's light 8,000 Pa window robot: sprays from a 120 ml tank for 32 m², plans a Z or N route, talks you through the job in 15 languages and holds on for 30 minutes after a power cut.
- Ecovacs73
WINBOT W2S OMNI
The Winbot with a corner scrubber: 8,000 Pa, a TruEdge brush that drops into the corners at 200 rpm, an 80 ml tank for 50 m² and a 5.2 kg battery station for 110 minutes off the mains.
- Dreame71
C1
Quiet 5,500 Pa window robot with corner brushes, a 14 cm/s planned route that resumes and returns to its start, a 140 kg-rated tether and a battery-station kit sold separately.
Other comparisons
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Dreame C1
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S PRO OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO
- MOVA N1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2S OMNI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI
- Dreame C1 vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI
- Ecovacs WINBOT MINI vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI
- Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO vs Ecovacs WINBOT W2 PRO OMNI

