Head to head · Robot vacuums
Narwal Freo Z10 Pro vs MOVA P50 Pro Ultra
Same score, same full dock: the Narwal publishes carpet boost and a 120-day bag, the MOVA an AI camera, mops left at the dock and a three-year warranty.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Published
Verdict
Both score 82/100. The difference is what each is built for.
Both score 82 on our engine, and both give you the whole dock for the money: bin emptying, mop washing and drying, water refill. Both navigate by LiDAR and carry dual spinning mops that extend to the skirting. Suction is a wash, 18,500 Pa against 19,000. The difference is in how each handles carpet and obstacles.
The MOVA P50 Pro Ultra leaves its mops at the dock before a carpet run and recognises obstacles with a camera, which lifts its obstacle-avoidance subscore to 70 against the Narwal's 58; it also publishes voice control and a three-year warranty. The Narwal Freo Z10 Pro lifts its mops 12 mm instead, detects obstacles with structured light only, and publishes a carpet boost mode and a 120-day dust bag against MOVA's 75 days.
For a home with cables, socks and a pet on the floor, the MOVA's camera is the concrete advantage. For a home that is mostly hard floor with little clutter, the Narwal's longer bag interval and carpet boost are the useful figures, and it lists a little lower. Neither publishes a threshold height or a runtime, so neither can be preferred on those.
Where the Narwal Freo Z10 Pro is ahead
- Cleaning93 · 83
- Navigation77 · 74
- Automation90 · 89
- Value90 · 85
- Dust bag interval120 days · 75 days
Where the MOVA P50 Pro Ultra is ahead
- Mopping92 · 86
- Obstacle Avoidance70 · 58
- Ease of Use95 · 83
- Reliability73 · 66
- Suction19,000 Pa · 18,500 Pa
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Narwal Freo Z10 Pro | MOVA P50 Pro Ultra |
|---|---|---|
 |  | |
82/100 ≈ $430Price in the manufacturer's shop | 82/100 ≈ $470Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Check price | Check price on Amazon.de | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 82/100 | 82/100 |
| Cleaning | 93 | 83 |
| Navigation | 77 | 74 |
| Mopping | 86 | 92 |
| Obstacle Avoidance | 58 | 70 |
| Automation | 90 | 89 |
| Ease of Use | 83 | 95 |
| Reliability | 66 | 73 |
| Value | 90 | 85 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Suction | 18,500 Pa | 19,000 Pa |
| Brush system | Tangle-resistant | Tangle-resistant |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet boost | Yes | No |
| Dustbin | Not published | Not published |
| Fan speed | 63,000 rpm | Not published |
| Particle removal | Over 99% in Narwal's lab test | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | LiDAR | LiDAR |
| Obstacle avoidance | Structured light | Single-camera AI |
| Saved floor plans | Not published | Not published |
| Threshold climb | Not published | Not published |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Twin spinning pads | Twin spinning pads |
| Mop lift | 12 mm | Detaches for carpet |
| Extending mop | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | Not published | Not published |
| Mop pressure | 12 N | Not published |
| Mop speed | 180 rpm | Not published |
| Mop pads | Reuleaux triangles with 10 mm overlap | Not published |
| Dirt sensor | DirtSense reads the dirt level and adjusts the wash | Not published |
| Mop reach | Not published | Swinging pad reaches 4 cm under furniture, 0 mm at the edge |
| Dock | ||
| Self-emptying | Yes | Yes |
| Mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Plumbed drain | No | No |
| Dust bag interval | 120 days | 75 days |
| Mop washing temperature | 45 to 75 °C, set by the dock's AI | 75 °C |
| Hot-air drying | 40 °C | Not published |
| Dust bag | 2.5 l | 3.2 l |
| Detergent | Dosed automatically by dirt level | Not published |
| Detergent dispensing | Not published | Automatic |
| Dock size and weight | Not published | 420 × 458 × 470 mm, 9 kg |
| Software | ||
| No-go zones | Yes | Yes |
| Pet waste recognition | No | No |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | Not published | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Noise in quiet mode | Under 56 dB | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Voice control | No | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | Not published | 4 kg |
| L × W × H | Not published | 350 × 350 × 104 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | Not published | 36 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Obstacles | ||
| Sensors | Two 3D structured-light sensors | Not published |
| Recognised object types | 100+ | Not published |
| Dirt detection | Not published | RGB camera spots flour or spilled milk and changes the strategy |
Also worth a look
- Dreame86
Aqua10 Roller
The roller mop and the climbing legs for €599: 30,000 Pa with a carpet boost, a roller at 9 to 11 N that lifts 14 mm under a sealing guard, a 4.2 cm sill or 6 cm double step, a fixed LiDAR at 120 mm, and a dock washing at 100 °C and drying at 65 °C.
- Roborock86
Saros 20
Roborock's flagship: 36,000 Pa, twin spinning mops the dock washes at 100 °C, and a solid-state 3D sensor instead of a LiDAR turret.
- Dreame85
Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete
Dreame's roller-mop flagship: 30,000 Pa, a 270 mm roller at 9 to 11 N that slides to the wall and lifts 14 mm, legs for a 4.2 cm sill or 8 cm double step, a retracting LiDAR for 97.5 mm, two AI cameras, and a dock washing at 100 °C and drying at 70 °C, for 2,999 zł or $999.99.