Head to head · Robot vacuums
Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra: Verdict Scores 86 and 85, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete has the higher Verdict Score, 86 to 85.
The Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete has the edge in navigation. The Dreame L60 Pro Ultra has the edge in obstacle avoidance and value.
No published figure puts the Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete ahead. No published figure puts the Dreame L60 Pro Ultra ahead.
At $1,700 against $1,400, the Dreame L60 Pro Ultra is the cheaper of the two. The Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete suits large American homes with thresholds, rugs and pets. The Dreame L60 Pro Ultra suits homes with high door thresholds and low furniture.
Where the Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete is ahead
- Navigation96 · 90
Where the Dreame L60 Pro Ultra is ahead
- Obstacle Avoidance95 · 90
- Value35 · 31
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete | Dreame L60 Pro Ultra |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
86/100 $1,700Price in the manufacturer's shop | 85/100 $1,400Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.de | Check price on Amazon.de | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 86/100 | 85/100 |
| Cleaning | 93 | 93 |
| Navigation | 96 | 90 |
| Mopping | 92 | 92 |
| Obstacle Avoidance | 90 | 95 |
| Automation | 90 | 90 |
| Ease of Use | 95 | 95 |
| Reliability | 73 | 73 |
| Value | 31 | 35 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Suction | 35,000 Pa | 35,000 Pa |
| Brush system | Tangle-resistant | Tangle-resistant |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet boost | Yes | Yes |
| Dustbin | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime, as tested | Not published | 220 minutes vacuuming and mopping in the quiet setting; 205 m² vacuuming |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Retracting LiDAR | Retracting LiDAR |
| Obstacle avoidance | Twin-camera AI | Camera + depth sensor |
| Saved floor plans | Not published | Not published |
| Threshold climb | 45 mm | Not published |
| Turret raised | 103 mm | 111 mm |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Twin spinning pads | Twin spinning pads |
| Mop lift | Detaches for carpet | Detaches for carpet |
| Extending mop | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | Not published | Not published |
| Mop pressure and speed | 15 N, 230 rpm, pads tilt ±5° | Not published |
| Hot-water mopping | 40 °C water on thermal pads | 40 °C water on thermal pads |
| Mop extension | 40 mm | Not published |
| Dock | ||
| Self-emptying | Yes | Yes |
| Mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Plumbed drain | No | No |
| Dust bag interval | 100 days | 100 days |
| Detergent | Two compartments, cleaning and deodorising solutions | Not published |
| Dust bag | Not published | 3.2 l |
| Software | ||
| No-go zones | Yes | Yes |
| Pet waste recognition | Yes | No |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | Not published | 3 h 40 min |
| Charging time | 1 h 20 min | Not published |
| Charge limit | Cut-off adjustable between 80 and 100% | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Voice control | Yes | Yes |
| Matter | Supported | By a coming update |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 4.7 kg | 4.5 kg |
| L × W × H | 350 × 350 × 80 mm | 350 × 350 × 89 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | 36 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Obstacles | ||
| Double-layer threshold | 88 mm | 88 mm with the ProLeap legs; no single-step figure is published |
| Recognised object types | 280+, down to 10 mm, with reinforcement-learning avoidance | 280+ |
| Fit | ||
| Dock size and weight | 390 × 423 × 499 mm, 10.6 kg | 340 × 456 × 590 mm, 9.3 kg |
Also worth a look
- Dreame86
Aqua10 Roller
Roller mop and legs without the retracting turret: 30,000 Pa with a carpet boost, a roller at 9 to 11 N that lifts 14 mm under a guard, a 4.2 cm sill or 6 cm double step, 120 mm tall, a 100 °C wash.
- Roborock86
Saros 20
Roborock's flagship: 36,000 Pa, twin spinning mops the dock washes at 100 °C, and a solid-state 3D sensor instead of a LiDAR turret.
- Dreame85
Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete
Dreame's roller-mop flagship: 30,000 Pa, a 270 mm roller at 9 to 11 N that slides to the wall and lifts 14 mm, legs for a 4.2 cm sill or 8 cm double step, two AI cameras and a 100 °C wash.
Other comparisons
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Roborock Saros 20 vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs Dreame L60 Pro Ultra
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs Dreame X60 Pro Ultra Complete

