Head to head · Robot vacuums
Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 2 vs Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 3
Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 2 or L10s Ultra Gen 3? The L10s Ultra Gen 3: suction 25,000 vs 10,000 Pa. Verdict Scores 75 and 76.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking.
Dreame press image
Dreame press image
Verdict
The Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 3 has the higher Verdict Score, 76 to 75.
The Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 2 has the edge in value. The Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 3 has the edge in cleaning, navigation, automation and ease of use.
In the manufacturers' published figures the Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 2 is ahead on 2 rows: dustbin (300 ml against 250 ml) and runtime (4 h against 3 h 51 min). In turn, the Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 3 is ahead on 2 rows: suction (25,000 Pa against 10,000 Pa) and dust bag interval (100 days against 75 days).
The Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 2 suits buyers in Poland who want a full dock more than strong suction. The Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 3 suits budget buyers who want the dock to do the chores.
Brand guides
Where the Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 2 is ahead
- Value97 · 66
- Dustbin300 ml · 250 ml
- Runtime4 h · 3 h 51 min
Where the Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 3 is ahead
- Cleaning71 · 66
- Navigation80 · 70
- Automation90 · 89
- Ease of Use97 · 94
- Suction25,000 Pa · 10,000 Pa
- Dust bag interval100 days · 75 days
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | Dreame Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 2 | Dreame Dreame L10s Ultra Gen 3 |
|---|---|---|
| | |
75/100 ≈ $330Price in the manufacturer's shop | 76/100 ≈ $490Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.com | Check price on Amazon.com | |
Shop links are affiliate links: a purchase through them may earn RoboVerdict a commission, which never changes a ranking. | ||
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 75/100 | 76/100 |
| Cleaning | 66 | 71 |
| Navigation | 70 | 80 |
| Mopping | 82 | 82 |
| Obstacle Avoidance | 58 | 58 |
| Automation | 89 | 90 |
| Ease of Use | 94 | 97 |
| Reliability | 64 | 64 |
| Value | 97 | 66 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Suction | 10,000 Pa | 25,000 Pa |
| Brush system | Rubber | Rubber |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet boost | Yes | No |
| Dustbin | 300 ml | 250 ml |
| Carpet detection | Ultrasonic; five carpet modes, a suction boost among them | Not published |
| TriCut brush | Sold separately | Not published |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | LiDAR | LiDAR |
| Obstacle avoidance | Structured light | Structured light |
| Saved floor plans | Not published | 4 |
| Threshold climb | 20 mm | Not published |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Twin spinning pads | Twin spinning pads |
| Mop lift | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Extending mop | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | Not published | Not published |
| Mop reach | Pads swing out to clean under furniture as low as 4 cm | Pad swings 4 cm; side brush extends |
| Wetness levels | 32 | 32 |
| Dock | ||
| Self-emptying | Yes | Yes |
| Mop washing | Automatic; no temperature stated | AceClean DryBoard with 20 nozzles; no temperature stated |
| Mop wash temperature | Not published | Not published |
| Mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Plumbed drain | No | No |
| Dust bag interval | 75 days | 100 days |
| Warm-air drying | At most 42 dB(A) | Not published |
| Clean water tank | 4.5 l | Not published |
| Dust bag | 3.2 l | 3.2 l |
| Dock size and weight | 457 × 340 × 590.5 mm, 8.5 kg | 457 × 340 × 590 mm, 8.86 kg |
| Water tanks | Not published | 4.5 l clean, 4.0 l dirty |
| Software | ||
| No-go zones | Yes | Yes |
| Pet waste recognition | No | No |
| Power | ||
| Battery | 5,200 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Runtime | 4 h | 3 h 51 min |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime setting | Standard suction on the Polish and German pages, quiet on the American one | Not published |
| Area per charge | Not published | 156 m², quiet vacuuming |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Voice control | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 4 kg | 3.89 kg |
| L × W × H | 350 × 350 × 97 mm | 350 × 350 × 97 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | Not published | Not published |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
Also worth a look
- Dreame87
Dreame X50 Master
The X50 Ultra robot on a plumbed 249 mm dock: 20,000 Pa, legs for a 4.2 cm sill, a LiDAR that retracts to 89 mm, an 80 °C wash, 220 minutes a charge and a 3-year warranty.
- Dreame76
Dreame D30 Ultra
A washing-and-emptying dock under a D-series robot: 25,000 Pa, a TriCut brush, pads that swing 4 cm and lift 10.5 mm, a laser obstacle sensor, four maps, 230 minutes a charge and 50 °C drying.
- Dreame76
Dreame X40 Ultra
The X40 on its tank dock: 12,000 Pa, a side brush and pads that both extend, pads that lift 10.5 mm and detach, an RGB camera, a 70 °C wash and 208 minutes a charge, but no size or weight.