Head to head · Robot vacuums
MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone vs MOVA V50 Ultra Complete
MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone vs MOVA V50 Ultra Complete: Verdict Scores 85 and 84, where each is ahead in the published figures, and which one to choose.
Manufacturers' published figures, scored by the same engine as the rankings. Nothing here is from a test we ran. · Updated
Verdict
The MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone has the higher Verdict Score, 85 to 84.
The MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone has the edge in mopping and value. The MOVA V50 Ultra Complete has the edge in cleaning and navigation.
In the manufacturers' published figures the MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone is ahead on one row: suction (26,000 Pa against 24,000 Pa). In turn, the MOVA V50 Ultra Complete is ahead on one row: dustbin (300 ml against 210 ml).
The MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone suits kitchens and hallways where a wide dock will not fit. The MOVA V50 Ultra Complete suits homes with pets, where the odour remover and the hair rating count.
Where the MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone is ahead
- Mopping95 · 92
- Value66 · 42
- Suction26,000 Pa · 24,000 Pa
Where the MOVA V50 Ultra Complete is ahead
- Cleaning80 · 77
- Navigation93 · 88
- Dustbin300 ml · 210 ml
Subscores are from our engine; the specification rows are the manufacturers' published figures, listed only where the better direction is beyond argument.
Full specification, side by side
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | |
85/100 ≈ $650Price in the manufacturer's shop | 84/100 ≈ $660Price in the manufacturer's shop | |
| Highest Verdict Score | ||
| Check price on Amazon.de | Check price on Amazon.de | |
| At a glance | ||
| Leads on |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for |
|
|
| Score breakdown | ||
| Verdict Score | 85/100 | 84/100 |
| Cleaning | 77 | 80 |
| Navigation | 88 | 93 |
| Mopping | 95 | 92 |
| Obstacle Avoidance | 95 | 95 |
| Automation | 90 | 90 |
| Ease of Use | 95 | 95 |
| Reliability | 73 | 73 |
| Value | 66 | 42 |
Specifications In green: the better figure where the direction is beyond argument, such as more lawn or less noise. Where it depends on your home, nothing is marked. | ||
| Cleaning | ||
| Suction | 26,000 Pa | 24,000 Pa |
| Brush system | Tangle-resistant | Tangle-resistant |
| Side brushes | 1 | 1 |
| Carpet boost | No | No |
| Dustbin | 210 ml | 300 ml |
| Navigation | ||
| Mapping | Retracting LiDAR | Retracting LiDAR |
| Obstacle avoidance | Camera + depth sensor | Camera + depth sensor |
| Saved floor plans | Not published | Not published |
| Threshold climb | Not published | 42 mm |
| Height with the sensor raised | 119.6 mm | 110.5 mm |
| Mopping | ||
| Mop type | Washed roller | Twin spinning pads |
| Mop lift | 14 mm | Detaches for carpet |
| Extending mop | Yes | Yes |
| Water tank | Not published | Not published |
| Mop roller | 25.6 cm roller at 4,100 Pa, extends 4.3 cm, 12 nozzles | Not published |
| Dock | ||
| Self-emptying | Yes | Yes |
| Mop washing | Yes | Hot water, 50 °C by the footnote |
| Mop drying | Yes | Yes |
| Water refill | Yes | Yes |
| Plumbed drain | No | No |
| Dust bag interval | 100 days | 100 days |
| Dock size | 420 × 278 × 470 mm, 278 mm wide | 458 × 420 × 470 mm |
| Water tanks | 4 l clean, 3.5 l dirty | 4 l clean, 3.5 l dirty |
| Dust bag | 3.2 l | 3.2 l |
| Detergent dispensing | 600 ml module | DuoSolution: a floor cleaner and a pet-odour remover |
| Warm-air drying | Not published | 60 °C in one hour; OmniDry also dries the bin and the bag |
| Software | ||
| No-go zones | Yes | Yes |
| Pet waste recognition | No | No |
| Power | ||
| Battery | Not published | Not published |
| Runtime | Not published | Not published |
| Charging time | Not published | Not published |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | No | No |
| 4G / LTE | No | No |
| Voice control | Yes | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | Not published | Not published |
| L × W × H | 350 × 350 × 96 mm | 350 × 350 × 90 mm |
| Noise | Not published | Not published |
| Support | ||
| Warranty | 36 months | 36 months |
| Released | Not published | Not published |
| Obstacles | ||
| Recognised obstacle types | 200+ | Not published |
| Recognised obstacles | Not published | 200+ |
| Chassis | ||
| Double-step threshold | Not published | 6 cm |
| Brush lift | Not published | DuoBrush 5 mm, side brush 10 mm |
Also worth a look
- Dreame86
Aqua10 Roller
Roller mop and legs without the retracting turret: 30,000 Pa with a carpet boost, a roller at 9 to 11 N that lifts 14 mm under a guard, a 4.2 cm sill or 6 cm double step, 120 mm tall, a 100 °C wash.
- Roborock86
Qrevo Curv 2 Pro
A Saros-shaped Qrevo: 25,000 Pa, a fully retractable LiDAR in an 80 mm body, 12 N spinning mops left in the dock for carpet, a chassis that lifts 20 mm and takes 4 cm double steps, and a 100 °C wash.
- Dreame85
Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete
Dreame's roller-mop flagship: 30,000 Pa, a 270 mm roller at 9 to 11 N that slides to the wall and lifts 14 mm, legs for a 4.2 cm sill or 8 cm double step, two AI cameras and a 100 °C wash.
Other comparisons
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete vs MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone vs Roborock Saros 20
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Standalone vs Dreame X60 Pro Master
- Dreame Aqua10 Roller vs MOVA V50 Ultra Complete
- Roborock Qrevo Curv 2 Pro vs MOVA V50 Ultra Complete
- Dreame Aqua10 Ultra Roller Complete vs MOVA V50 Ultra Complete
- Dreame L60 Pro Ultra vs MOVA V50 Ultra Complete
- Dreame X60 Max Ultra Complete vs MOVA V50 Ultra Complete
- MOVA Z60 Ultra Roller Complete vs MOVA V50 Ultra Complete
- Roborock Saros 20 vs MOVA V50 Ultra Complete
- Dreame X60 Pro Master vs MOVA V50 Ultra Complete

